Difference between revisions of "Natalie Tarry"
(old profile needs updating) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Natalie Tarry (formerly Arend) is | + | '''Natalie Tarry''' (formerly Arend) is deputy director of the [[Social Market Foundation]] (SMF), a Blairite-style think tank based in London. Before joining SMF she worked as a researcher for the [[New Local Government Network]] (NLGN). Tarry also worked at the [[European Parliament]] for a German MEP and for an Economic Research Institute in Frankfurt, Germany. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Tarry's focused research has been in the area of public/private partnerships. <ref> [http://www.nlgn.org.uk/public/section/articles/page/34/ A link to one of Tarry's articles] </ref> Another report by Tarry addresses understanding local public service productivity. <ref> [http://www.nlgn.org.uk/pdfs/upload/Made%20to%20Measure_Summary.pdf/ Report] </ref> | |
| − | In a 2005 Public Eye report, Tarry discusses how increasing public services choices brings both benefits and challenges. | + | |
| − | <http://www.accaglobal.com/archive/public_eye/51/2376726/> | + | In a 2005 ''Public Eye'' report, Tarry discusses how increasing public services choices brings both benefits and challenges. <ref> [http://www.accaglobal.com/archive/public_eye/51/2376726/ ''Public Eye'' report] (2005) </ref> |
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Latest revision as of 03:34, 3 October 2014
Natalie Tarry (formerly Arend) is deputy director of the Social Market Foundation (SMF), a Blairite-style think tank based in London. Before joining SMF she worked as a researcher for the New Local Government Network (NLGN). Tarry also worked at the European Parliament for a German MEP and for an Economic Research Institute in Frankfurt, Germany.
Tarry's focused research has been in the area of public/private partnerships. [1] Another report by Tarry addresses understanding local public service productivity. [2]
In a 2005 Public Eye report, Tarry discusses how increasing public services choices brings both benefits and challenges. [3]
