Difference between revisions of "Globalisation:First Defence Documents"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
unprecedented since the East of Suez controversy in the 1960s, and has led to a
 
unprecedented since the East of Suez controversy in the 1960s, and has led to a
 
degree of public criticism by the former First Sea Lord which it would be perilous to
 
degree of public criticism by the former First Sea Lord which it would be perilous to
ignore.
+
ignore.<ref>[http://www.firstdefence.org/documents First Defence Documents]First Defence Website,accessed 16th November 2010 </ref>
 
 
 
 
The full content of the document can be accessed at [[First Defence]]
 
 
 
  
 +
The full content of the document can be accessed at the [[First Defence]] website.
  
 +
==Nuclear  Disarmament versus peace in the 21st Century==
 +
By Dr. Julian Lewis
  
 +
Dr Julian Lewis, Parliamentary Chairman of First Defence, is the Shadow Defence
 +
Minister dealing with nuclear deterrence and Royal Navy issues. He has served
 +
on the Defence Select Committee and was Shadow Minister for the Cabinet
 +
Office in the run-up to the 2005 General Election. He has been Conservative MP
 +
for New Forest East since 1997, and was a Deputy Director of the Conservative
 +
Research Department from 1990 to 1996. In the 1980s, he was a leading
 +
campaigner against the CND and in favour of the decisions to acquire Trident and
 +
deploy NATO cruise missiles. A second edition of his book, Changing Direction:
 +
British Military Planning for Post-war Strategic Defence, 1942-47, was published
 +
by Frank Cass in 2003.<ref>[http://www.firstdefence.info/documents/Nuclear%20Disarmament%20versus%20Peace.pdf Nuclear Disarmament]First Defence Website, accessed 17th November 2010</ref>
  
 +
The full article can be found here at [[http://www.firstdefence.info/our-reports/76-nuclear-disarmament]]
  
 +
==External Vigilance:The Defence of a Free Society==
 +
By Mark Frisk MP
  
 +
In this paper Mark Prisk MP offers some practical ideas which government should adopt. He reinforces the notion that we
 +
should not only be vigilant about our security, but that by responding to the new kind of terror we do not succumb to the desired end-game of our enemy; the very end of our open and democratic society.<ref>[http://www.firstdefence.info/documents/vigilance.pdf External Vigilance]The Defence of a Free Society, accessed 17th November 2010</ref>
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
  
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
<ref>'[http://www.firstdefence.org/documents]', ''First Defence website'', accessed 16th November 2010 </ref>
 

Latest revision as of 01:58, 19 November 2010

'The State of The Navy' By Dr. Julian Lewis

Summary of the Argument

Eight years after emerging apparently victorious from the 1998 Strategic Defence Review, the Royal Navy is bloodied, battered and on the ropes. An initial sacrifice of three frigates and two submarines has turned into the devastating loss of 14 major frontline vessels – with a prospect of even more being run down or mothballed. There is a serious prospect of 19 destroyers and frigates having to do the work of 30. These reckless reductions have been based on the strategic falsehood – the ‘Hoon Excuse’ – that numbers no longer matter in an era of more capable ships. The reluctant acquiescence of the Admirals has been bought by the promise – as yet unfulfilled – that two Future Aircraft Carriers will be ordered. In the meantime, their target in-service dates of 2012 and 2015 have been abandoned in all but name. Having admitted that the Armed Forces are involved in more complex and more numerous operations than were anticipated in the Strategic Defence Review, the Government have betrayed the Royal Navy by inflicting massive damage to the front line instead of augmenting it. The next step in this betrayal is a threat to close one of the United Kingdom’s only three Naval Bases. The Type 45 destroyer-building programme has been slashed from 12 to eight; only six of these have been ordered; and none is to be fitted with the Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles requested by the Naval Staff. The final size of the future submarine fleet is uncertain, but seems likely to consist of only eight, or for a period just seven, boats – apart from those carrying the nuclear deterrent. This whole sorry saga has provoked a level of concern at the top of the Service unprecedented since the East of Suez controversy in the 1960s, and has led to a degree of public criticism by the former First Sea Lord which it would be perilous to ignore.[1]

The full content of the document can be accessed at the First Defence website.

Nuclear Disarmament versus peace in the 21st Century

By Dr. Julian Lewis

Dr Julian Lewis, Parliamentary Chairman of First Defence, is the Shadow Defence Minister dealing with nuclear deterrence and Royal Navy issues. He has served on the Defence Select Committee and was Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office in the run-up to the 2005 General Election. He has been Conservative MP for New Forest East since 1997, and was a Deputy Director of the Conservative Research Department from 1990 to 1996. In the 1980s, he was a leading campaigner against the CND and in favour of the decisions to acquire Trident and deploy NATO cruise missiles. A second edition of his book, Changing Direction: British Military Planning for Post-war Strategic Defence, 1942-47, was published by Frank Cass in 2003.[2]

The full article can be found here at [[1]]

External Vigilance:The Defence of a Free Society

By Mark Frisk MP

In this paper Mark Prisk MP offers some practical ideas which government should adopt. He reinforces the notion that we should not only be vigilant about our security, but that by responding to the new kind of terror we do not succumb to the desired end-game of our enemy; the very end of our open and democratic society.[3]

Notes

  1. First Defence DocumentsFirst Defence Website,accessed 16th November 2010
  2. Nuclear DisarmamentFirst Defence Website, accessed 17th November 2010
  3. External VigilanceThe Defence of a Free Society, accessed 17th November 2010