Difference between revisions of "Carl Ungerer"
(New page: ==On Critical Terrorism Studies== <blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">In this Alice in Wonderland world of peer-referenced j...) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==On Critical Terrorism Studies== | ==On Critical Terrorism Studies== | ||
| − | <blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">In this Alice in Wonderland world of peer-referenced journals read only by participants in this mutually reinforcing discourse, the focus of study is not Islamist ideology and its propensity to violence, but our own long-repressed responsibility for the cause of Islamist rage. Given the nature of preferment and funding in Australian academe, the imams of critical terror studies will continue to maintain this delusion for the foreseeable future. <ref>David Martin Jones and Carl Ungerer, '[Delusion reigns in terror studies]', ''The Australian'', 15 September 2006</ref></blockquote> | + | <blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">In this Alice in Wonderland world of peer-referenced journals read only by participants in this mutually reinforcing discourse, the focus of study is not Islamist ideology and its propensity to violence, but our own long-repressed responsibility for the cause of Islamist rage. Given the nature of preferment and funding in Australian academe, the imams of critical terror studies will continue to maintain this delusion for the foreseeable future. <ref>David Martin Jones and Carl Ungerer, '[http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20413449-7583,00.html Delusion reigns in terror studies]', ''The Australian'', 15 September 2006</ref></blockquote> |
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 08:47, 3 June 2009
On Critical Terrorism Studies
In this Alice in Wonderland world of peer-referenced journals read only by participants in this mutually reinforcing discourse, the focus of study is not Islamist ideology and its propensity to violence, but our own long-repressed responsibility for the cause of Islamist rage. Given the nature of preferment and funding in Australian academe, the imams of critical terror studies will continue to maintain this delusion for the foreseeable future. [1]
Notes
- ↑ David Martin Jones and Carl Ungerer, 'Delusion reigns in terror studies', The Australian, 15 September 2006
