Difference between revisions of "Mark Lynas"
(→Notes) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| − | Mark Lynas and [[Oliver Tickell]] are two journalists who helped drafting a climate change scenario study of the [[Stockholm Network]].<ref> | + | Mark Lynas and [[Oliver Tickell]] are two journalists who helped drafting a climate change scenario study of the [[Stockholm Network]].<ref>http://www.stockholm-network.org, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> Other authors include big oil management people ([[BP]] and [[Shell]]) apart from a few academics. The study claims a distance from climate sceptical research promoted by "U.S. think tanks" according to media reports on the scenario study, although the Stockholm Network itself has previously promoted climate scepticism itself.<ref>http://www.corporateeurope.org/ThinkTankSurvey2006.html, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> The scenario study argues in favor of a radical departure from the political course taken so far (Kyoto) allegedly because the instruments are less effective than an alternative promoted in a "step change" scenario advocating taxation at the origin of the carbon chain. No information on distributional consequences are given, unfortunately. It is unclear who would carry the burden if this allegedly economic growth supporting alternative would be pursued, and the whole strategy may be primarily meant to help undermining the Kyoto diplomacy. Mark Lynas in any case has also written in favor of nuclear energy.<ref>http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> |
==Biographical Information== | ==Biographical Information== | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
[[Category:Climate Change|Lynas, Mark]] | [[Category:Climate Change|Lynas, Mark]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 14:57, 13 March 2009
Contents
Background
Mark Lynas and Oliver Tickell are two journalists who helped drafting a climate change scenario study of the Stockholm Network.[1] Other authors include big oil management people (BP and Shell) apart from a few academics. The study claims a distance from climate sceptical research promoted by "U.S. think tanks" according to media reports on the scenario study, although the Stockholm Network itself has previously promoted climate scepticism itself.[2] The scenario study argues in favor of a radical departure from the political course taken so far (Kyoto) allegedly because the instruments are less effective than an alternative promoted in a "step change" scenario advocating taxation at the origin of the carbon chain. No information on distributional consequences are given, unfortunately. It is unclear who would carry the burden if this allegedly economic growth supporting alternative would be pursued, and the whole strategy may be primarily meant to help undermining the Kyoto diplomacy. Mark Lynas in any case has also written in favor of nuclear energy.[3]
Biographical Information
History
Current activities
Views
Affiliations
People
Funding
Clients
Publications, Contact, Resources and Notes
http://www.marklynas.org/ http://www.stockholm-network.org/Conferences-and-Programmes/Energy-and-Environment/carbonscenarios
Publications
Contact
- Address:
- Phone:
- Email:
- Website:
Resources
Notes
- ↑ http://www.stockholm-network.org, accessed March 13, 2009
- ↑ http://www.corporateeurope.org/ThinkTankSurvey2006.html, accessed March 13, 2009
- ↑ http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors, accessed March 13, 2009
