Difference between revisions of "User talk:Steven Harkins"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(The Times)
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
--[[User:David|David]] 21:14, 20 August 2008 (BST)
 
--[[User:David|David]] 21:14, 20 August 2008 (BST)
 +
 +
== The Times ==
 +
 +
Hi Steven
 +
 +
So glad you're taking on The Times and Murdoch in this great article.
 +
 +
Just a couple of points:
 +
 +
I seem to recall that opposition to Murdoch taking over The Times centered on some law that prevents monopolies emerging in the media? or does this law only apply in the US? Here, an MP tried to get the Competition Commission involved in the question. Would there have been a law involved, or was it something softer like some kind of precedent situation on ownership of the media?
 +
 +
Good starting points on this are articles at
 +
http://select.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/opinion/29krugman.html?_r=1
 +
and
 +
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/may/25/rupertmurdoch.bskyb
 +
 +
It's fine to quote articles like this to make the point for us. I think it's worth putting in a bit about this controversy.
 +
 +
Also, I know it is obvious to us Spin people why media monopolies are bad, but I think it should be spelled out in a sentence or two for the public who may not be so familiar with the argument. One of the articles above makes the point, with people thinking rubbish things about the war on terror etc because they heard it on one of Murdoch's channels.
 +
 +
Another point--please do give complete refs rather than just urls, as they tend to go out of date quickly and then the reader has no way of finding our sources. Have a look at
 +
 +
http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/SpinProfiles:A_Guide_to_Referencing
 +
 +
Section: How to format referencing
 +
 +
and do them like this. Can you redo the refs already in this article according to this format? If anything isn't clear in these "Help" pages pls let me know, as I want to make it easy to follow.
 +
 +
Many thanks!
 +
--[[User:Claire Robinson|Claire Robinson]] 11:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:31, 19 January 2009

Hi Steven,

good to meet you the other day. Here are some tips.

Best

--David 22:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC) Hi Steven,

Long time no see. Welcome back!

good work on Bacardi. Well done.

Looking forward to what you do next!

--David 21:14, 20 August 2008 (BST)

The Times

Hi Steven

So glad you're taking on The Times and Murdoch in this great article.

Just a couple of points:

I seem to recall that opposition to Murdoch taking over The Times centered on some law that prevents monopolies emerging in the media? or does this law only apply in the US? Here, an MP tried to get the Competition Commission involved in the question. Would there have been a law involved, or was it something softer like some kind of precedent situation on ownership of the media?

Good starting points on this are articles at http://select.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/opinion/29krugman.html?_r=1 and http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/may/25/rupertmurdoch.bskyb

It's fine to quote articles like this to make the point for us. I think it's worth putting in a bit about this controversy.

Also, I know it is obvious to us Spin people why media monopolies are bad, but I think it should be spelled out in a sentence or two for the public who may not be so familiar with the argument. One of the articles above makes the point, with people thinking rubbish things about the war on terror etc because they heard it on one of Murdoch's channels.

Another point--please do give complete refs rather than just urls, as they tend to go out of date quickly and then the reader has no way of finding our sources. Have a look at

http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/SpinProfiles:A_Guide_to_Referencing

Section: How to format referencing

and do them like this. Can you redo the refs already in this article according to this format? If anything isn't clear in these "Help" pages pls let me know, as I want to make it easy to follow.

Many thanks! --Claire Robinson 11:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)