Difference between revisions of "Sharon Bowles"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(new entry: Sharon Bowles. cat: MEP, cat: Europe)
 
(article body and resources)
Line 1: Line 1:
Sharon Bowles (born 12 June 1953, Oxford) is a Liberal Democrat MEP from the UK. Having trained as a patent agent (1978-1981), she has been practising as a Patent and Trade Mark Attorney since 1981.<ref>[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members/expert/alphaOrder/view.do?language=EN&id=33570 European Parliament Website - MEP Directory: Sharon Bowles] accessed 06 November 2008.</ref> She established her own firm, Bowles Horton, with her husband, Andrew Horton, also a European Patent Attorney.<ref>[http://www.libdemmeps.eu/new/index.php?page=sharon-bowles Liberal Democrat Members of the European Parliament - SharonBowles] accessed 06 November 2008.</ref> Her professional interests have mainly been concerned with electronics, integrated circuit design and semiconductor fabrication.<ref>[http://www.bmj.bund.de/media/archive/1905.pdf German Ministry of Justice - Resume: Sharow Bowles] accessed 06 November 2008.</ref>
+
Sharon Bowles (born 12 June 1953, Oxford) is a Liberal Democrat MEP from the UK. Having trained as a patent agent (1978-1981), she has been practising as a Patent and Trade Mark Attorney since 1981.<ref>[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members/expert/alphaOrder/view.do?language=EN&id=33570 European Parliament Website - MEP Directory: Sharon Bowles], accessed 06 November 2008.</ref> She established her own firm, Bowles Horton, with her husband, Andrew Horton, also a European Patent Attorney.<ref>[http://www.libdemmeps.eu/new/index.php?page=sharon-bowles Liberal Democrat Members of the European Parliament - SharonBowles], accessed 06 November 2008.</ref> Her professional interests have mainly been concerned with electronics, integrated circuit design and semiconductor fabrication.<ref>[http://www.bmj.bund.de/media/archive/1905.pdf German Ministry of Justice - Resume: Sharow Bowles], accessed 06 November 2008.</ref>
  
She was elected to the European Parliament in May 2005 as an MEP for South East England. She is also a member of [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/homeCom.do;jsessionid=B6A7A8E8CCC36A6F4B68FB2D4DC224CD.node1?language=EN&body=ECON Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe] and a substitute member of the [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/homeCom.do;jsessionid=B6A7A8E8CCC36A6F4B68FB2D4DC224CD.node1?language=EN&body=JURI Committee on Legal Affairs].<ref>[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members/expert/alphaOrder/view.do?language=EN&id=33570 European Parliament Website - MEP Directory: Sharon Bowles] accessed 06 November 2008.</ref>
+
She was elected to the European Parliament in May 2005 as an MEP for South East England. She is also a member of [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/homeCom.do;jsessionid=B6A7A8E8CCC36A6F4B68FB2D4DC224CD.node1?language=EN&body=ECON Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe] and a substitute member of the [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/homeCom.do;jsessionid=B6A7A8E8CCC36A6F4B68FB2D4DC224CD.node1?language=EN&body=JURI Committee on Legal Affairs].<ref>[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members/expert/alphaOrder/view.do?language=EN&id=33570 European Parliament Website - MEP Directory: Sharon Bowles], accessed 06 November 2008.</ref>
  
  
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
==Conflicts of Interest==
 
==Conflicts of Interest==
 +
 +
Bowles Horton has mainly been concerned with electronics, integrated circuit design and semiconductor fabrication,<ref>[http://www.bmj.bund.de/media/archive/1905.pdf German Ministry of Justice - Resume: Sharow Bowles], accessed 06 November 2008.</ref> and “has a client list which includes some of the major leaders in R&D in various electronics fields throughout the world.”[http://www.bowleshorton.com/index.html Bowles Horton website], accessed 06 November 2008.</ref>
 +
 +
Bowles argues “I don’t think there is any conflict of interest with me being an MEP and a patent lawyer, as I am not practicing. Technically I do maintain my ability to practice because of my partner in the business, my husband, and there might be some occasion where it is necessary to sign a form. I am certainly far too busy as an MEP, but I can’t divest myself from a financial interest via my spouse.”<ref>Sharon Bowles, ''Interview with Andy Rowell''], May 2008, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
 +
Although Bowles suggests that her financial interest is via her spouse, she declares on her official register of interests that she is paid for her post as partner of the company.
 +
 +
Political opponents ask if it is possible for Bowles to “see the other side of the debate” given that she is so in favour of patents.<ref>Leading MEP on patent policy, ''Interview with Author'', November 2007, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> One example they point to is the debate over software patents as mentioned in the above section.
 +
 +
Following the defeat of the software patents directive in 2005, the European Commission in early 2006 launched a new consultation on the patent system in Europe.<ref>[http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indprop/docs/patent/consult_en.pdf European Commission, ''Questionnaire On the patent system in Europe'', Internal Market and Services DG, Brussels, January 09, 2006], accessed 06 November 2008.</ref> Later that year Bowles was one of two MEPs – the other being Klaus-Heiner Lehne – at the forefront of pushing the new Commission proposal called the European Patent Litigation Agreement.<ref>[http://eupat.ffii.org/06/epla/ FFII, EPLA 2006], accessed 06 November 2008.</ref>
 +
 +
In October 2006 Bowles and Lehne were among seven MEPs to put forward a motion for a resolution to the Parliament urging the European Commission to explore “all possible ways of improving the patent and patent litigation systems in the EU”.<ref>[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+MOTION+B6-2006-0522+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN Motion For A Resolution to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
 +
pursuant to Rule 103(2) of the Rules of Procedure, by – Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Giuseppe Gargani and Nicole Fontaine,  on behalf of the PPE-DE Group; Maria Berger and Michel Rocard, on behalf of the PSE Group; Sharon Bowles and Toine Manders, on behalf of the ALDE Group on future patent policy in Europe, October 4, 2006], accessed 06 November 2008.</ref> In March 2007, Bowles and Lehne travelled to the European Patent Conference at which Bowles was a speaker. On her blog, Bowles wrote: “The panel session goes well. I get the feeling that I am the most in tune with those attending. Several of the patent attorneys... come to me afterwards and say that I had done well and made things very clear. I am gratified for I can think of nothing worse than my former colleagues thinking I was doing a bad job!”<ref>[http://sharonbowles.blogspot.com/2007/03/patent-conference.html Sharon Bowles website], accessed 06 November 2008.</ref>
 +
 +
Bowles defends her work on the software patents directive by saying “ It was more a question of technical expertise. People used to say ‘she would say that wouldn’t she’. [The directive] was more concerned about [the patent] industry in general. It’s like saying judges like crime. It is ridiculous.” She argues “the patent work I do as an MEP is looking at how we get a common European system that is cheaper for businesses to operate under. That is of interest to everybody. I don’t just think you should have patents.”<ref>Sharon Bowles, ''Interview with Andy Rowell'', May 2008, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
 +
 +
Finally Bowles likens her critics to the “forces of evil who are girding their loins because they think something might be happening and they want to take me out of the equation.”<ref>Sharon Bowles, ''Interview with Andy Rowell'', May 2008, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
  
  
 
==Resources==  
 
==Resources==  
 +
 +
*[http://www.bowleshorton.com/index.html Bowles Horton website], accessed 06 November 2008.
 +
*[http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indprop/docs/patent/consult_en.pdf European Commission, ''Questionnaire On the patent system in Europe'', Internal Market and Services DG, Brussels, January 09, 2006], accessed 06 November 2008.
 +
*[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members/expert/alphaOrder/view.do?language=EN&id=33570 European Parliament Website - MEP Directory: Sharon Bowles], accessed 06 November 2008.
 +
*[http://eupat.ffii.org/06/epla/ FFII, EPLA 2006], accessed 06 November 2008.
 +
*[http://www.bmj.bund.de/media/archive/1905.pdf German Ministry of Justice - Resume: Sharow Bowles], accessed 06 November 2008.
 +
*Leading MEP on patent policy, ''Interview with Author'', November 2007, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
 +
*[http://www.libdemmeps.eu/new/index.php?page=sharon-bowles Liberal Democrat Members of the European Parliament - SharonBowles], accessed 06 November 2008.
 +
*[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+MOTION+B6-2006-0522+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN Motion For A Resolution to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission pursuant to Rule 103(2) of the Rules of Procedure, by – Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Giuseppe Gargani and Nicole Fontaine,  on behalf of the PPE-DE Group; Maria Berger and Michel Rocard, on behalf of the PSE Group; Sharon Bowles and Toine Manders, on behalf of the ALDE Group on future patent policy in Europe, October 4, 2006], accessed 06 November 2008.
 +
*[http://sharonbowles.blogspot.com/2007/03/patent-conference.html Sharon Bowles website], accessed 06 November 2008.
 +
*[http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
 +
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 17:10, 6 November 2008

Sharon Bowles (born 12 June 1953, Oxford) is a Liberal Democrat MEP from the UK. Having trained as a patent agent (1978-1981), she has been practising as a Patent and Trade Mark Attorney since 1981.[1] She established her own firm, Bowles Horton, with her husband, Andrew Horton, also a European Patent Attorney.[2] Her professional interests have mainly been concerned with electronics, integrated circuit design and semiconductor fabrication.[3]

She was elected to the European Parliament in May 2005 as an MEP for South East England. She is also a member of Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe and a substitute member of the Committee on Legal Affairs.[4]


Background

Register of Interests

Conflicts of Interest

Bowles Horton has mainly been concerned with electronics, integrated circuit design and semiconductor fabrication,[5] and “has a client list which includes some of the major leaders in R&D in various electronics fields throughout the world.”Bowles Horton website, accessed 06 November 2008.</ref>

Bowles argues “I don’t think there is any conflict of interest with me being an MEP and a patent lawyer, as I am not practicing. Technically I do maintain my ability to practice because of my partner in the business, my husband, and there might be some occasion where it is necessary to sign a form. I am certainly far too busy as an MEP, but I can’t divest myself from a financial interest via my spouse.”[6] Although Bowles suggests that her financial interest is via her spouse, she declares on her official register of interests that she is paid for her post as partner of the company.

Political opponents ask if it is possible for Bowles to “see the other side of the debate” given that she is so in favour of patents.[7] One example they point to is the debate over software patents as mentioned in the above section.

Following the defeat of the software patents directive in 2005, the European Commission in early 2006 launched a new consultation on the patent system in Europe.[8] Later that year Bowles was one of two MEPs – the other being Klaus-Heiner Lehne – at the forefront of pushing the new Commission proposal called the European Patent Litigation Agreement.[9]

In October 2006 Bowles and Lehne were among seven MEPs to put forward a motion for a resolution to the Parliament urging the European Commission to explore “all possible ways of improving the patent and patent litigation systems in the EU”.[10] In March 2007, Bowles and Lehne travelled to the European Patent Conference at which Bowles was a speaker. On her blog, Bowles wrote: “The panel session goes well. I get the feeling that I am the most in tune with those attending. Several of the patent attorneys... come to me afterwards and say that I had done well and made things very clear. I am gratified for I can think of nothing worse than my former colleagues thinking I was doing a bad job!”[11]

Bowles defends her work on the software patents directive by saying “ It was more a question of technical expertise. People used to say ‘she would say that wouldn’t she’. [The directive] was more concerned about [the patent] industry in general. It’s like saying judges like crime. It is ridiculous.” She argues “the patent work I do as an MEP is looking at how we get a common European system that is cheaper for businesses to operate under. That is of interest to everybody. I don’t just think you should have patents.”[12]

Finally Bowles likens her critics to the “forces of evil who are girding their loins because they think something might be happening and they want to take me out of the equation.”[13]


Resources


References

  1. European Parliament Website - MEP Directory: Sharon Bowles, accessed 06 November 2008.
  2. Liberal Democrat Members of the European Parliament - SharonBowles, accessed 06 November 2008.
  3. German Ministry of Justice - Resume: Sharow Bowles, accessed 06 November 2008.
  4. European Parliament Website - MEP Directory: Sharon Bowles, accessed 06 November 2008.
  5. German Ministry of Justice - Resume: Sharow Bowles, accessed 06 November 2008.
  6. Sharon Bowles, Interview with Andy Rowell], May 2008, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  7. Leading MEP on patent policy, Interview with Author, November 2007, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  8. European Commission, Questionnaire On the patent system in Europe, Internal Market and Services DG, Brussels, January 09, 2006, accessed 06 November 2008.
  9. FFII, EPLA 2006, accessed 06 November 2008.
  10. [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+MOTION+B6-2006-0522+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN Motion For A Resolution to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission pursuant to Rule 103(2) of the Rules of Procedure, by – Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Giuseppe Gargani and Nicole Fontaine, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group; Maria Berger and Michel Rocard, on behalf of the PSE Group; Sharon Bowles and Toine Manders, on behalf of the ALDE Group on future patent policy in Europe, October 4, 2006], accessed 06 November 2008.
  11. Sharon Bowles website, accessed 06 November 2008.
  12. Sharon Bowles, Interview with Andy Rowell, May 2008, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  13. Sharon Bowles, Interview with Andy Rowell, May 2008, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.