Difference between revisions of "World Sugar Research Organisation"
(→Spinwatch resources) |
(→Spinwatch resources) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/3/3e/WSRO5.pdf WSRO document 5] Fax from John Lupien, FAO, to Suzanne Harris, ILSI 6 November 1996. | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/3/3e/WSRO5.pdf WSRO document 5] Fax from John Lupien, FAO, to Suzanne Harris, ILSI 6 November 1996. | ||
*[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/9/9c/WSRO6.pdf WSRO document 6] Email from Guy Nantel, to Suzie Harris, ILSI, cc John Lupien, FAO, 12 March 1997. | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/9/9c/WSRO6.pdf WSRO document 6] Email from Guy Nantel, to Suzie Harris, ILSI, cc John Lupien, FAO, 12 March 1997. | ||
| − | *[ WSRO document 7] | + | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/2/26/WSRO7.pdf WSRO document 7] |
| − | *[ WSRO document 8] | + | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/c/c3/WSRO8.pdf WSRO document 8] |
| − | *[ WSRO document 9] | + | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/0/0c/WSRO9.pdf WSRO document 9] |
| − | *[ WSRO document 10] | + | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/b/b0/WSRO10.pdf WSRO document 10] |
| − | *[WSRO document 11] | + | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/b/b8/WSRO11.pdf WSRO document 11] |
| − | *[ WSRO document 12] | + | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/f/f2/WSRO12.pdf WSRO document 12] |
| − | *[ WSRO document 13] | + | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/4/46/WSRO13.pdf WSRO document 13] |
| − | *[ WSRO document 14] | + | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/7/77/WSRO14.pdf WSRO document 14] |
| − | *[ WSRO document 15] | + | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/9/9e/WSRO15.pdf WSRO document 15] |
| − | *[ WSRO document 16] | + | *[http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/6/65/WSRO16.pdf WSRO document 16] |
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
Revision as of 16:15, 1 March 2006
The campaign by the World Sugar Research Organisation to manipulate science and to fix the results of WHO/FAO expert reports (as revealed by panorama last week). This is done in conjuction with an obscure organisation not well known called the International Life Sciences Institute. With members from literally hundreds of food industry TNCs this is a key food industry lobby group. It was set up by and is funded by coca cola and pursues their interests on a global stage. This is in addition to the 500 odd agencies in pr and associated fields which Coke employs world wide.
Website: http://www.wsro.org/
Spinwatch resources
- WSRO document 1 Fax from Alex Malaspina, ILSI to John Lupien, FAO, 21 June 1996.
- WSRO document 2 Fax from Riaz Khan, WSRO, to John Lupien, FAO, 18 July 1996.
- WSRO document 3 Fax from Riaz Khan, WSRO to Mr Bic, FAO 18 September 1996.
- WSRO document 4 Fax from Suzie Harris, ILSI to John Lupien, FAO, 5 November 1996.
- WSRO document 5 Fax from John Lupien, FAO, to Suzanne Harris, ILSI 6 November 1996.
- WSRO document 6 Email from Guy Nantel, to Suzie Harris, ILSI, cc John Lupien, FAO, 12 March 1997.
- WSRO document 7
- WSRO document 8
- WSRO document 9
- WSRO document 10
- WSRO document 11
- WSRO document 12
- WSRO document 13
- WSRO document 14
- WSRO document 15
- WSRO document 16
Resources
- BBC, 'UN probes sugar industry claims' Friday, 8 October, 2004, 23:02 GMT 00:02 UK [1]
- BBC Panorama, 'The trouble with sugar' Monday, 4 October 2004, 11:40 GMT 12:40 UK [2]
- Transcript of panorama programme here: [3]
- Watch Panorama episode [4]
- Sarah Boseley 'WHO "infiltrated by food industry"' The Guardian Thursday January 9, 2003
- Sarah Boseley 'Sugar industry threatens to scupper WHO' The Guardian Monday April 21, 2003
- Sarah Boseley 'WHO 'buried' report to please food industry' The Guardian Wednesday November 3, 2004
- John Yudkin 'Attack is the best defence' Chapter 21 in Pure White and Deadly Penguin, 1988.
