User talk:Tom Mills

Hi,

I wonder about the rationale for the conference atendees selection? If you look at Herman and o'Sullivan they have a list of terrorism institutes.: http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Category:The_%22Terrorism%22_Industry

They say that (in 1989) CSIS is one of the most influential terror think tanks. Also Rand Corporation is clearly key. do we have any way of assessing which are the most important organisations to include? Perhaps we should add RAnd and CSIS and maybe a couple of others? What do you think?

--David 11:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Ah I see. I think if you can put all that info on the page that would give a much better sense of what you did and why some orgs are not there. that makes the rationale much stronger.

Great! --David 11:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

got a book yesterday by this guy: http://www.uscanada.bham.ac.uk/staff/hewitt.htm

Is there any reason to include him in any list? --David 12:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

faulty HTML

Hi Tom

You just entered a table using: <td align=“center”>

DO NOT USE slanted quotation or apostrophy marks... use the simple >> " or ' << otherwise HTML section will be ignored.

--Paulo 14:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I am referring to the table found here:

Terrorexpertise:Experts from Major World Publications

you silly

I didnt suggest that you transform -->

I urged you to use straight quotation marks " instead of ” == the latter is wrong...

--Paulo 19:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi,

Terrorexpertise:Experts from Major World Publications this page appears to have the wrong content: on conferences and not publications? --David 08:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Have a look. It contains the conference data and not the lexis search... --David 09:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

or maybe just the wrong title?

--David 09:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)