Difference between revisions of "Committee for Economic Development"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Excerpt from G. William Domhoff, (1967) Who Rules America, Spectrum Books, pp. 74-5)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Concerned primarily with issues of an economic nature, the Committee for Economic Development, which was founded in 1942 by [[Paul G. Hoffman]] of Studebaker and the [[Ford Foundation]], is made up of representatives of the nation’s leading corporations. As of 1957, 47 of its trustees were also members of the [[Council on Foreign Relations]]. Among its chairmen have been [[Marion B. Folsom]] of [[Eastman Kodak]]; [[Meyer Kestnbaum]] of Hart, Schaffner & Marx; [[J. D. Zellerbach]] of the [[Crown-Zellerbach Corporation]]; and [[Donald K. David]] of the [[Harvard Business School]], [[Ford Foundation]], and Atlantic & Pacific Company (A & P). The CED has two major functions, suggesting new economic policies and promoting and improving economic education. For example, a 27-member CED commission made a study which was one of the bases for the Kennedy Administration’s tax cut. Among that commission’s members were 13 members of the CFR. As of 1957, CED’s training program in economics for prospective teachers was being used in 20 colleges, and 20 school systems around the country were trying out a program to introduce economics into the curriculum as early as the first grade. Over 19,000 teachers have participated in the CED’s summer workshops on the teaching of economics. In 1961 the committee’s information division distributed 3,716,676 books and pamphlets.’
 
Concerned primarily with issues of an economic nature, the Committee for Economic Development, which was founded in 1942 by [[Paul G. Hoffman]] of Studebaker and the [[Ford Foundation]], is made up of representatives of the nation’s leading corporations. As of 1957, 47 of its trustees were also members of the [[Council on Foreign Relations]]. Among its chairmen have been [[Marion B. Folsom]] of [[Eastman Kodak]]; [[Meyer Kestnbaum]] of Hart, Schaffner & Marx; [[J. D. Zellerbach]] of the [[Crown-Zellerbach Corporation]]; and [[Donald K. David]] of the [[Harvard Business School]], [[Ford Foundation]], and Atlantic & Pacific Company (A & P). The CED has two major functions, suggesting new economic policies and promoting and improving economic education. For example, a 27-member CED commission made a study which was one of the bases for the Kennedy Administration’s tax cut. Among that commission’s members were 13 members of the CFR. As of 1957, CED’s training program in economics for prospective teachers was being used in 20 colleges, and 20 school systems around the country were trying out a program to introduce economics into the curriculum as early as the first grade. Over 19,000 teachers have participated in the CED’s summer workshops on the teaching of economics. In 1961 the committee’s information division distributed 3,716,676 books and pamphlets.’
 +
 +
==Excerpt from G. William Domhoff, (1979) The Powers that be, Vintage. pp. 67-9==
 +
 +
The Committee for Economic Development (CED) was founded in the early 1940’s to help plan for the postwar world. The corporate leaders who were the driving force in CED had two major concerns at that time: 1) there might be another major depression after the war; 2) if businesspeople did not present plans for the postwar era, other sectors of society might present plans that were not acceptable to businesspeople.10 The CED expressly. was trying to avoid any identification with special-interest pleading:
 +
 +
The Committee would avoid “promoting the special interests of busi¬ness itself as such� and would likewise refrain from speaking for any other special interests. . . . The CED was to be a businessman’s organization that would speak in the national interest.11
 +
 +
The CED consisted of 200 corporate leaders in its early years. Later it was to include a handful of university presidents among its members. In addition, leading economists have served as research advisors to the CED; many have gone on to serve in advisory roles in both Republican and Democratic administra¬tions, and particularly on the Council of Economic Advisers. Although there is an overlap in membership with the Council on Foreign Relations, the committee has a different mix of members. Unlike the council, it has few bankers, and no corporate lawyers, journalists and academic experts. This gives the organization a more conventional and less liberal cast.
 +
Like the council, the CED works through study groups which are aided by academic experts. The study groups have considered every conceivable general issue from farm policy to government reorganization to the social responsibility of corporations, but the greater emphasis is on economic issues of both a domestic and international nature. The most ambitious of committee projects usually have been financed by the Ford Foundation.
 +
 +
Unlike the larger CFR, which would find it cumbersome to reach an “official� position on any given issue, the results of com¬mittee study groups are released as official policy statements of the organization. The statements are published in pamphlet form and disseminated widely in business, government and media circles. There is reason to believe that many of these reports have had considerable influence, for there is a striking similarity be¬tween CED statements and policies that were enacted shortly thereafter.12
 +
The fact that committee trustees are tapped for government service also lends credence to the idea that the organization has a policy impact. Of the 150 men who were CED trustees between1942 and 1957, 38 served in government posts in both Republican and Democratic administrations.13  In 1971 five committee trustees
 +
 +
7.“Programs and Purposes: Studies on Foreign Policy 1970-1971� (Coun¬cil on Foreign Relations, 1971).
 +
8. Kraft, op. cit., p. 67.
 +
9. Shoup and Minter, op. cit., p. 242.
 +
10. David Eakins, “The Development of Corporate Liberal Policy Research in the United States, 1885-1965,� unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Wisconsin, 1966, p. 340.
 +
11. Ibid., p. 346.
 +
12. ibid., chapters 7 and 8; Karl Schriftgiesser, Business and Public Policy (Prentice-Hall, 1967).
 +
13. Karl Schriftgiesser, Business Comes of Age (Harper & Row, 1960 ), p. 162.
 +
were in the Nixon administration. In the Carter administration, CED trustees served as Secretary of the Treasury and Secretary of the Navy, and the former chairperson of the CED Research Advisory Board was the head of the Council of Economic Advisers.

Revision as of 16:10, 2 December 2005

Excerpt from G. William Domhoff, (1967) Who Rules America, Spectrum Books, pp. 74-5

Concerned primarily with issues of an economic nature, the Committee for Economic Development, which was founded in 1942 by Paul G. Hoffman of Studebaker and the Ford Foundation, is made up of representatives of the nation’s leading corporations. As of 1957, 47 of its trustees were also members of the Council on Foreign Relations. Among its chairmen have been Marion B. Folsom of Eastman Kodak; Meyer Kestnbaum of Hart, Schaffner & Marx; J. D. Zellerbach of the Crown-Zellerbach Corporation; and Donald K. David of the Harvard Business School, Ford Foundation, and Atlantic & Pacific Company (A & P). The CED has two major functions, suggesting new economic policies and promoting and improving economic education. For example, a 27-member CED commission made a study which was one of the bases for the Kennedy Administration’s tax cut. Among that commission’s members were 13 members of the CFR. As of 1957, CED’s training program in economics for prospective teachers was being used in 20 colleges, and 20 school systems around the country were trying out a program to introduce economics into the curriculum as early as the first grade. Over 19,000 teachers have participated in the CED’s summer workshops on the teaching of economics. In 1961 the committee’s information division distributed 3,716,676 books and pamphlets.’

Excerpt from G. William Domhoff, (1979) The Powers that be, Vintage. pp. 67-9

The Committee for Economic Development (CED) was founded in the early 1940’s to help plan for the postwar world. The corporate leaders who were the driving force in CED had two major concerns at that time: 1) there might be another major depression after the war; 2) if businesspeople did not present plans for the postwar era, other sectors of society might present plans that were not acceptable to businesspeople.10 The CED expressly. was trying to avoid any identification with special-interest pleading:

The Committee would avoid “promoting the special interests of busi¬ness itself as such� and would likewise refrain from speaking for any other special interests. . . . The CED was to be a businessman’s organization that would speak in the national interest.11

The CED consisted of 200 corporate leaders in its early years. Later it was to include a handful of university presidents among its members. In addition, leading economists have served as research advisors to the CED; many have gone on to serve in advisory roles in both Republican and Democratic administra¬tions, and particularly on the Council of Economic Advisers. Although there is an overlap in membership with the Council on Foreign Relations, the committee has a different mix of members. Unlike the council, it has few bankers, and no corporate lawyers, journalists and academic experts. This gives the organization a more conventional and less liberal cast. Like the council, the CED works through study groups which are aided by academic experts. The study groups have considered every conceivable general issue from farm policy to government reorganization to the social responsibility of corporations, but the greater emphasis is on economic issues of both a domestic and international nature. The most ambitious of committee projects usually have been financed by the Ford Foundation.

Unlike the larger CFR, which would find it cumbersome to reach an “official� position on any given issue, the results of com¬mittee study groups are released as official policy statements of the organization. The statements are published in pamphlet form and disseminated widely in business, government and media circles. There is reason to believe that many of these reports have had considerable influence, for there is a striking similarity be¬tween CED statements and policies that were enacted shortly thereafter.12 The fact that committee trustees are tapped for government service also lends credence to the idea that the organization has a policy impact. Of the 150 men who were CED trustees between1942 and 1957, 38 served in government posts in both Republican and Democratic administrations.13 In 1971 five committee trustees

7.“Programs and Purposes: Studies on Foreign Policy 1970-1971� (Coun¬cil on Foreign Relations, 1971). 8. Kraft, op. cit., p. 67. 9. Shoup and Minter, op. cit., p. 242. 10. David Eakins, “The Development of Corporate Liberal Policy Research in the United States, 1885-1965,� unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Wisconsin, 1966, p. 340. 11. Ibid., p. 346. 12. ibid., chapters 7 and 8; Karl Schriftgiesser, Business and Public Policy (Prentice-Hall, 1967). 13. Karl Schriftgiesser, Business Comes of Age (Harper & Row, 1960 ), p. 162. were in the Nixon administration. In the Carter administration, CED trustees served as Secretary of the Treasury and Secretary of the Navy, and the former chairperson of the CED Research Advisory Board was the head of the Council of Economic Advisers.