Difference between revisions of "Investigative Research"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Further Reading)
(→‎Further Reading)
Line 122: Line 122:
 
*Peter Phillips, August 14, 2003 'Inside Bohemian Grove US Elites Celebrate Patriarchy, Racism and Class Privilege', ''CounterPunch'' http://www.counterpunch.org/phillips08142003.html  
 
*Peter Phillips, August 14, 2003 'Inside Bohemian Grove US Elites Celebrate Patriarchy, Racism and Class Privilege', ''CounterPunch'' http://www.counterpunch.org/phillips08142003.html  
 
*Phillips, P, ''A Relative Advantage: Sociology of the San Francisco Bohemian Club A Doctoral Dissertation'' (1994) http://libweb.sonoma.edu/regional/faculty/phillips/bohemianindex.html  
 
*Phillips, P, ''A Relative Advantage: Sociology of the San Francisco Bohemian Club A Doctoral Dissertation'' (1994) http://libweb.sonoma.edu/regional/faculty/phillips/bohemianindex.html  
 +
*Savage, A., & Hyde, R. (2014). Using freedom of information requests to facilitate research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(3), 303-317.
 
*Scott, J. (1990) ''A matter of record'', Cambridge: Polity.
 
*Scott, J. (1990) ''A matter of record'', Cambridge: Polity.
 
*Simpson, C ‘Scholars Perfect Psychological Warfare Techniques’ Excerpt from ''Science of Coercion: Communication Research and Psychological Warfare, 1945-1960'' by Christopher Simpson (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 48-51: http://www.cia-on-campus.org/social/simpson.html  
 
*Simpson, C ‘Scholars Perfect Psychological Warfare Techniques’ Excerpt from ''Science of Coercion: Communication Research and Psychological Warfare, 1945-1960'' by Christopher Simpson (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 48-51: http://www.cia-on-campus.org/social/simpson.html  
 
*John Sugden and Alan Tomlinson '[http://irs.sagepub.com/content/34/4/385.short Digging the dirt and staying clean: Retrieving the Investigative Tradition]' for a Critical Sociology of Sport', ''International Review for the Sociology of Sport'' December 1999 vol. 34 no. 4 385-397.
 
*John Sugden and Alan Tomlinson '[http://irs.sagepub.com/content/34/4/385.short Digging the dirt and staying clean: Retrieving the Investigative Tradition]' for a Critical Sociology of Sport', ''International Review for the Sociology of Sport'' December 1999 vol. 34 no. 4 385-397.
 +
*Walby, K. & Larsen, M., 2011. [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kevin_Walby/publication/258182123_Access_to_Information_and_Freedom_of_Information_Requests_Neglected_Means_of_Data_Production_in_the_Social_Sciences/links/02e7e52b9d907e50ef000000.pdf Access to Information and Freedom of Information Requests: Neglected Means of Data Production in the Social Sciences]. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(1), pp.31–42.
 +
Kevin Walby, Alex Luscombe (2016) [http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1468794116679726?journalCode=qrja Criteria for quality in qualitative research and use of freedom of information requests in the social sciences], ''Qualitative Research'',  First Published December 9, 2016.
 
*Walraff, G. (1978) ''Walraff: the Undesirable Journalist'', London: Pluto.
 
*Walraff, G. (1978) ''Walraff: the Undesirable Journalist'', London: Pluto.
 
*Williams, K. (1989). Researching the powerful: problems and possibilities of social research. ''Contemporary Crises'', 13(3), 252-274.
 
*Williams, K. (1989). Researching the powerful: problems and possibilities of social research. ''Contemporary Crises'', 13(3), 252-274.

Revision as of 05:08, 18 September 2017

Investigative research is a name given to a collection of research techniques and methods used by researchers (including journalists, social scientists and others). It is intended to unearth secret, hidden or obscure information that can build a more comprehensive picture of the issue under investigation.


Orientation

Jack Douglas advocated ‘investigative’ social research in his 1976 book. He sums up the approach as follows: ‘conflict is the reality of life, suspicion is the guiding principle’.[1] Lee criticises this by noting the potential for the scepticism necessary to ‘harden into cynicism and a contempt for those studied’.[2]

Access

Access to information is a major problem for all researchers, but is felt particularly by investigative researchers who are more likely to come up against refusals and to challenge them. Powerful organisations often attempt to limit access by a variety of techniques. These do not always involve threats of violence as in this example:

If you try and inspect them, I will personally break your legs (Chairman of the company publishing Burke’s Peerage to journalists investigating lack of company documentation submitted to Companies House)[3]

The Royal Ulster Constabulary was a notoriously closed organisation for researchers and its policy on research issued after the 1994 IRA ceasefire made its instrumental view

We welcome requests... to conduct research which may prove to be of benefit to the force.[4]

However, powerful organisations may allow social researchers access for a variety of reasons. Kevin Williams writes:

In spite of the difficulties - and these are many and real - the powerful can be more open and co-operative than many social scientists believe. They are often prepared to discuss matters and in many cases welcome the chance to place their views on the record. their motives are mixed. they can emanate from a desire to correct what they see as misconceptions of their role and work. ... Talking to a researcher appears to be one of the few channels of communication they have with the public. The powerful also talk to the researcher to counter challenges from other interests within their institution. Powerful institutions are not monolithic. a large number of interests exist inside institutions... which are in a state of flux and change. Such a situation can work in the researcher’s favour. [5]

Covert methods

Gunter Walraff is a German investigative journalist who specialises in going undercover to reveal abuses of power. His work is excoriated by corporate lobby groups such as the West German Employers association:

When [Walraff] describes an industry on the basis of his ‘research’, his writing is characterised by a consistent scale of social values which could by fashioned only by a conscious ideologist of class struggle. Each of Walraff’s publications reaches us as a hatefilled social-political campaign aimed at strengthening the machinations of class struggle. His purpose is to arouse among workers by hand and brain a class-consciousness which they will ultimately use to destroy the social system. his methods of investigation and documentation must be categorically condemned; the logical consequence of his point of view is that the end justifies any means and that all sense of responsibility is lost.[6]

Resources

Guidance on specific investigative techniques

Guidance on sources of information and tools

Press and Media databases

Email services

Mailinator. Allows you to generate a free one-time only, incoming-only email address http://www.mailinator.com/

Archives (Scotland)

Glasgow University http://www.archives.gla.ac.uk/about/default.html HBoS http://www.hbosplc.com/abouthbos/history/group_archives.asp RBS http://www.rbs.com/about02.asp?id=ABOUT_US/OUR_HERITAGE/OUR_ARCHIVES National Archives of Scotland http://www.nas.gov.uk/about/default.asp Scottish Executive Consultations http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Consultations/Current Scottish Executive Publications http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/Recent Glasgow City Council Archives http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/en/Residents/Libraries/Collections/Localhistory/CityCouncilArchives/

Resources on lobbying/corporate power

Freedom of Information

For more see the page on Freedom of Information

Government Offices, Official Sources

Departmental pages

Web research

Corporate information

Further Reading

Kevin Walby, Alex Luscombe (2016) Criteria for quality in qualitative research and use of freedom of information requests in the social sciences, Qualitative Research, First Published December 9, 2016.

  • Walraff, G. (1978) Walraff: the Undesirable Journalist, London: Pluto.
  • Williams, K. (1989). Researching the powerful: problems and possibilities of social research. Contemporary Crises, 13(3), 252-274.

See Also

Notes

  1. ↑ cited in Lee, 1993: 147.
  2. ↑ 1993: 148.
  3. ↑ cited in Scott, 1990:164
  4. ↑ Superintendent B. D. Wilson, Force Research Branch, RUC, 1997, cited n Miller, D. (1998) 'Colonialism and Academic Representations of the Trouble', in Miller, D. (Ed.) Rethinking Northern Ireland, London: Longman
  5. ↑ Williams, K. (1989). Researching the powerful: problems and possibilities of social research. Contemporary Crises, 13(3): 255.
  6. ↑ W. German employers association statement on work of Gunter Walraff, cited in Walraff, G. (1978) Walraff: the Undesirable Journalist, London: Pluto.: p. 1
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=Investigative_Research&oldid=247864"