Difference between revisions of "User talk:Claire Harkins"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
--[[User:David|David]] 16:04, 5 Feb 2007 (GMT) | --[[User:David|David]] 16:04, 5 Feb 2007 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ahh, I see what has happened. You have done the following: | ||
| + | Scottish & Newcastle Web Site Jan 2007. [http://www.scottish-newcastle.com/snplc/about/company/facts/] | ||
| + | Scottish & Newcastle [http://www.scottish-newcastle.com/snplc/about/company/facts Company Facts] Accessed Jan 2007. | ||
| + | |||
| + | My mistake. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The full ref should look like this: | ||
| + | Scottish & Newcastle [http://www.scottish-newcastle.com/snplc/about/company/facts Company Facts] Accessed Jan 2007. | ||
| + | --[[User:David|David]] 16:06, 5 Feb 2007 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 16:06, 5 February 2007
Hi,
this is your talk page. people can eave you messages here and you will see that you have a message next time you log on. My talk page is here: http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/User_talk:David
Anyway, this message is to say that I have revised the first ref on the Scottish & Newcastle page so that it has your version and a revised version. If you can try and follow this style of referencing that would be great. ie every ref should take the form:
author [url(if online) title of article/page] date, volume, no, pages etc, accessed on ...date.
This is the same as in any academic essay etc.
--David 21:09, 2 Feb 2007 (GMT)
Good stuff on S&N. Can you try and sort the refs? If you close the lines breaks between refs they will automatcially number correctly.
--David 16:04, 5 Feb 2007 (GMT)
Ahh, I see what has happened. You have done the following: Scottish & Newcastle Web Site Jan 2007. [1] Scottish & Newcastle Company Facts Accessed Jan 2007.
My mistake.
The full ref should look like this: Scottish & Newcastle Company Facts Accessed Jan 2007. --David 16:06, 5 Feb 2007 (GMT)
