Difference between revisions of "Erminegate"
(Created page with "In January 2009 the ''Sunday Times'' published details of an eight-month-long undercover investigation in which reporters posed as lobbyists representing a foreign retail company...") |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | In January 2009 the ''Sunday Times'' published details of an eight-month-long undercover investigation in which reporters posed as lobbyists representing a foreign retail company. The 'lobbyists' aimed to have their 'company' gain exemption from business rates through a series of meetings with peers. What became know as [[erminegate]], Ermine being a heraldic fur red robe sometimes seen in the Lords, raised fresh concerns over 'cash for influence'. | + | In January 2009 the ''Sunday Times'' published details of an eight-month-long undercover investigation in which reporters posed as lobbyists representing a foreign retail company. The 'lobbyists' aimed to have their 'company' gain exemption from business rates through a series of meetings with peers. What became know as [[erminegate]], Ermine being a heraldic fur red robe sometimes seen in the Lords, raised fresh concerns over 'cash for influence'.<ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/journalism/glossary/politics/erminegate.shtml 'Erminegate'], ''BBC''.</ref> |
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 11:34, 19 January 2012
In January 2009 the Sunday Times published details of an eight-month-long undercover investigation in which reporters posed as lobbyists representing a foreign retail company. The 'lobbyists' aimed to have their 'company' gain exemption from business rates through a series of meetings with peers. What became know as erminegate, Ermine being a heraldic fur red robe sometimes seen in the Lords, raised fresh concerns over 'cash for influence'.[1]
Notes
- ↑ 'Erminegate', BBC.