Difference between revisions of "Met Pro Rapid Response"
(stub) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Spooks Portal badge}} | {{Template:Spooks Portal badge}} | ||
| − | '''Met Pro Rapid Response''' is a security firm. In March 2011 it provided security for a budget cuts council meeting of [[Barnet Council]] and was later found to have covertly and illegally filmed residents, councillors and campaigners who attended. | + | '''Met Pro Rapid Response''' is a UK security firm. In March 2011 it provided security for a budget cuts council meeting of [[Barnet Council]] and was later found to have covertly and illegally filmed residents, councillors and campaigners who attended. |
==Activities== | ==Activities== | ||
| + | It emerged that Barnet Council had paid Met Pro Rapid Response over £1.2m over the past five years. The Council "had no records of the procurement process, it had no evidence of what tasks this company had performed for the council... no written evidence confirming that Met Pro’s staff were CRB checked, and that it lacked the proper SIA licenses to be practising security". | ||
| + | <ref>Adam Langleben, [http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/06/bloggers-expose-tory-barnet-easy-council-where-outsourcing-is-out-of-control/ How bloggers exposed Tory ‘EasyCouncil’ where outsourcing is out of control], June 20th 2011, accessed 22 June 2011 </ref> | ||
==Affiliations== | ==Affiliations== | ||
| Line 30: | Line 32: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | [[Category:Spooks | + | [[Category:Spooks]] |
Revision as of 17:22, 22 June 2011
|
This article is part of SpinWatch's Spooks Portal, tracking intelligence agencies and dirty tricks. |
Met Pro Rapid Response is a UK security firm. In March 2011 it provided security for a budget cuts council meeting of Barnet Council and was later found to have covertly and illegally filmed residents, councillors and campaigners who attended.
Contents
Activities
It emerged that Barnet Council had paid Met Pro Rapid Response over £1.2m over the past five years. The Council "had no records of the procurement process, it had no evidence of what tasks this company had performed for the council... no written evidence confirming that Met Pro’s staff were CRB checked, and that it lacked the proper SIA licenses to be practising security". [1]
Affiliations
People
Clients
Contact, Resources and Notes
Contact
- Address:
- Phone:
- Email:
- Website:
Resources
Notes
- ↑ Adam Langleben, How bloggers exposed Tory ‘EasyCouncil’ where outsourcing is out of control, June 20th 2011, accessed 22 June 2011
