Difference between revisions of "Globalisation:International Policy Network: Funding and connections"
Fergus Jones (talk | contribs) |
Fergus Jones (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
IPN state “it is supported entirely by charitable donations from individuals, foundations and businesses. It receives no money from any government or political parties, and it does no contract work.” They also state that they abide by a strict “code of independence ” which ensures that they are not influenced by any external bodies. However the following evidence opens a debate on the previous statement. <ref>About IPN,[http://www.policynetwork.net/about-ipn]IPN 21 date acsessed 21/10/2010</ref> | IPN state “it is supported entirely by charitable donations from individuals, foundations and businesses. It receives no money from any government or political parties, and it does no contract work.” They also state that they abide by a strict “code of independence ” which ensures that they are not influenced by any external bodies. However the following evidence opens a debate on the previous statement. <ref>About IPN,[http://www.policynetwork.net/about-ipn]IPN 21 date acsessed 21/10/2010</ref> | ||
IPN receives mass sums of money every year from industries that have major interests in the outcomes of the organisations research. It has been stated and argued that IPN received funding from the likes of Pfizer (the world’s largest pharmaceutical company, who may be interested in the outcomes of IPN’s research into health) and other large industrial companies such as big tobacco (again who may be interested in outcomes of IPN’s research into health) This has lead to much criticism from parties such as the media and politicians. For example, Norman Baker MP said: "We may be able to deduce from the comments of Julian Morris that there is an ulterior motive behind his denial of climate change." <ref>Norman Baker MP,”[http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2005-02-08a.1353.1#g1355.1]” Climate Change And The Environment 5/2/2005, date acsessed 23/11/2010 </ref> This statement does have evidence to support it, and will be shown through the main example of who funds IPN –ExxonMobil, one of the world’s largest and most profitable oil and gas organisations. | IPN receives mass sums of money every year from industries that have major interests in the outcomes of the organisations research. It has been stated and argued that IPN received funding from the likes of Pfizer (the world’s largest pharmaceutical company, who may be interested in the outcomes of IPN’s research into health) and other large industrial companies such as big tobacco (again who may be interested in outcomes of IPN’s research into health) This has lead to much criticism from parties such as the media and politicians. For example, Norman Baker MP said: "We may be able to deduce from the comments of Julian Morris that there is an ulterior motive behind his denial of climate change." <ref>Norman Baker MP,”[http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2005-02-08a.1353.1#g1355.1]” Climate Change And The Environment 5/2/2005, date acsessed 23/11/2010 </ref> This statement does have evidence to support it, and will be shown through the main example of who funds IPN –ExxonMobil, one of the world’s largest and most profitable oil and gas organisations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ExxonMobil | ||
| + | ExxonMobil state that they support research that promotes discussions on issues that are directly relevant to the organisation, in 2005 they made world wide contributions of $6.4million for public information and funding, $139,000 of that sum was contributed towards IPN for research on climate change. <ref> ExxonMobil, “[http://research.greenpeaceusa.org/?a=dowload&d=4380 Exxon Mobil Corporation 2004 Worldwide Contributions and Community Investments Public Information and Policy Research ]”, pdf at page 5, accessed 13.11.10 </ref> | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 18 November 2010
Funding IPN state “it is supported entirely by charitable donations from individuals, foundations and businesses. It receives no money from any government or political parties, and it does no contract work.” They also state that they abide by a strict “code of independence ” which ensures that they are not influenced by any external bodies. However the following evidence opens a debate on the previous statement. [1] IPN receives mass sums of money every year from industries that have major interests in the outcomes of the organisations research. It has been stated and argued that IPN received funding from the likes of Pfizer (the world’s largest pharmaceutical company, who may be interested in the outcomes of IPN’s research into health) and other large industrial companies such as big tobacco (again who may be interested in outcomes of IPN’s research into health) This has lead to much criticism from parties such as the media and politicians. For example, Norman Baker MP said: "We may be able to deduce from the comments of Julian Morris that there is an ulterior motive behind his denial of climate change." [2] This statement does have evidence to support it, and will be shown through the main example of who funds IPN –ExxonMobil, one of the world’s largest and most profitable oil and gas organisations.
ExxonMobil ExxonMobil state that they support research that promotes discussions on issues that are directly relevant to the organisation, in 2005 they made world wide contributions of $6.4million for public information and funding, $139,000 of that sum was contributed towards IPN for research on climate change. [3]
Notes
- ↑ About IPN,[1]IPN 21 date acsessed 21/10/2010
- ↑ Norman Baker MP,”[2]” Climate Change And The Environment 5/2/2005, date acsessed 23/11/2010
- ↑ ExxonMobil, “Exxon Mobil Corporation 2004 Worldwide Contributions and Community Investments Public Information and Policy Research ”, pdf at page 5, accessed 13.11.10
