Difference between revisions of "National Security Strategy September 2002"
(→Preemption) |
m |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The National Security Strategy of September 2002 was the formal promulgation of the Bush Doctrine which the president had earlier introduced in his 1 June 2002 speech at West Point. Many of | + | The National Security Strategy of September 2002 was the formal promulgation of the Bush Doctrine which the president had earlier introduced in his 1 June 2002 speech at West Point. Many of its ideas stem from the Defence Policy Guidance of 1992, and the [[Project for the New American Century]]'s 'Rebuilding America's Defences'. |
| − | ==Preemption== | + | ==Key Tenets== |
| − | In his January 29, 2002 State of the Union address, George W. Bush had first introduced the doctrine of preemption: 'I will not wait on events as dangers gather. I will not stand by as peril draws closer.' He reiterated the point in his 1 June speech at West Point, in which he stressed that 'new threats also require new thinking.’ He then added an oblique call for preemption: ‘If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long.’ NSS 2002 made preemption official US policy. | + | The key tenets of NSS 2002 are unilateralism, preemption, missilde defence, and combating terrorism by focusing on states. All of them originated with [[neoconservatives]]. |
| + | ===Preemption=== | ||
| + | In his January 29, 2002 State of the Union address, George W. Bush had first introduced the doctrine of preemption: 'I will not wait on events as dangers gather. I will not stand by as peril draws closer.'<ref>George W. Bush, [http://stateoftheunionaddress.org/2002-george-w-bush State of the Union Address], The White House, 29 January 2002</ref> He reiterated the point in his 1 June speech at West Point, in which he stressed that 'new threats also require new thinking.’ He then added an oblique call for preemption: ‘If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long.’<ref name="wp">George W. Bush, [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/06/print/20020601-3.html President Bush Delivers Graduation Speech at West Point], The White House, 1 June 2002</ref> NSS 2002 made preemption official US policy. | ||
==Content Analysis== | ==Content Analysis== | ||
In the document the word 'terrorist' appears 47 times, 'freedom' 46 times, 'liberty' 11 times, 'WMD' 9 times, and 'free market' 8 times. | In the document the word 'terrorist' appears 47 times, 'freedom' 46 times, 'liberty' 11 times, 'WMD' 9 times, and 'free market' 8 times. | ||
===Historical Antecedents=== | ===Historical Antecedents=== | ||
| − | The document is an inventory of neoconservative ideas | + | The document is an inventory of neoconservative ideas from the past two decades. Most of its key tenets have unmistakable antecedents in neoconservative writings. |
:‘The great struggles of the twentieth century between liberty and totalitarianism ended with a decisive victory for the forces of freedom—and a single sustainable model for national success: freedom, democracy, and free enterprise.’ ('''Origins:''' Francis Fukuyama's 'The End of History') | :‘The great struggles of the twentieth century between liberty and totalitarianism ended with a decisive victory for the forces of freedom—and a single sustainable model for national success: freedom, democracy, and free enterprise.’ ('''Origins:''' Francis Fukuyama's 'The End of History') | ||
| − | :'And America will hold to account nations that are compromised by terror, including those who harbor terrorists' (''' | + | :'And America will hold to account nations that are compromised by terror, including those who harbor terrorists' ('''Origins:''' This line was inserted into Bush's 11 September 2001 speech by David Frum at Richard Perle's suggestion) |
:'We will build defenses against ballistic missiles and other means of delivery.' ('''Origins:''' Albert Wohlstetter) | :'We will build defenses against ballistic missiles and other means of delivery.' ('''Origins:''' Albert Wohlstetter) | ||
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
*[http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/nsc/nss/2002/ The National Security Strategy], The White House, September 2002 | *[http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/nsc/nss/2002/ The National Security Strategy], The White House, September 2002 | ||
| + | *Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, ''America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order'' (Cambridge University Press 2004), pp.141-156 | ||
[[category:Iraq War 2003]] | [[category:Iraq War 2003]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:50, 6 July 2010
The National Security Strategy of September 2002 was the formal promulgation of the Bush Doctrine which the president had earlier introduced in his 1 June 2002 speech at West Point. Many of its ideas stem from the Defence Policy Guidance of 1992, and the Project for the New American Century's 'Rebuilding America's Defences'.
Key Tenets
The key tenets of NSS 2002 are unilateralism, preemption, missilde defence, and combating terrorism by focusing on states. All of them originated with neoconservatives.
Preemption
In his January 29, 2002 State of the Union address, George W. Bush had first introduced the doctrine of preemption: 'I will not wait on events as dangers gather. I will not stand by as peril draws closer.'[1] He reiterated the point in his 1 June speech at West Point, in which he stressed that 'new threats also require new thinking.’ He then added an oblique call for preemption: ‘If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long.’[2] NSS 2002 made preemption official US policy.
Content Analysis
In the document the word 'terrorist' appears 47 times, 'freedom' 46 times, 'liberty' 11 times, 'WMD' 9 times, and 'free market' 8 times.
Historical Antecedents
The document is an inventory of neoconservative ideas from the past two decades. Most of its key tenets have unmistakable antecedents in neoconservative writings.
- ‘The great struggles of the twentieth century between liberty and totalitarianism ended with a decisive victory for the forces of freedom—and a single sustainable model for national success: freedom, democracy, and free enterprise.’ (Origins: Francis Fukuyama's 'The End of History')
- 'And America will hold to account nations that are compromised by terror, including those who harbor terrorists' (Origins: This line was inserted into Bush's 11 September 2001 speech by David Frum at Richard Perle's suggestion)
- 'We will build defenses against ballistic missiles and other means of delivery.' (Origins: Albert Wohlstetter)
Resources
- The National Security Strategy, The White House, September 2002
- Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge University Press 2004), pp.141-156
