Difference between revisions of "User talk:Roy Revie"
(→Islamic MU refs: new section) |
(→IMU: new section) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
many thanks | many thanks | ||
--[[User:Claire Robinson|Claire Robinson]] 19:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Claire Robinson|Claire Robinson]] 19:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == IMU == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also the problem with this page is the lexis refs used in the past. All of them need overhauled I am afraid.... | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:David|David]] 19:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:55, 11 February 2010
refs
Roy
note I have adjusted your refs on the Tatham page. the format should be that you put the url and then a space and then the title of the article or web page--all this should go in square brackets and then the title becomes the hotlink. simple...
eg <ref>[http:www.biggles.co.uk/about About Biggles Co.], Biggles Co. website, accessed 4 Feb 2010</ref>
thanks! --Claire Robinson 17:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
can you check you email?
--David 15:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Islamic MU refs
Roy really good stuff on Islamic Media Unit but can you avoid giving LexisNexis urls to articles as most people can't access them? instead look for a non-Lexis source thru google. I just looked for a telegraph article on google for which you have a Lexis url reference and it is indeed online elsewhere. David can tell you more about this if you are in contact with him.
many thanks --Claire Robinson 19:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
IMU
Also the problem with this page is the lexis refs used in the past. All of them need overhauled I am afraid....
--David 19:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
