Difference between revisions of "Epistemic community"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reading)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Epistemic Community]] is a concept developed in political science.
 
[[Epistemic Community]] is a concept developed in political science.
  
 +
 +
The concept is particularly associated with [[Peter M Haas]], though confusingly, it is also used by [[Ernst Haas]] the Robson Professor of government at [[UC Berkeley]].  In fact as Ernst Haas has put it: 'Actually, my son invented the term'.<ref>[http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/people/Haas/haas-con3.html Ernst Haas Interview: Conversations with History]; Institute of International Studies, UC Berkeley
 +
Science and Progress in International Relations: Conversation with Ernst B. Haas, Robson Research Professor of Government; 10/30/00 by Harry Kreisler. Page 3 of 5: Theories and Ideas</ref>
 
==Criticisms==
 
==Criticisms==
  

Revision as of 09:16, 26 November 2009

Epistemic Community is a concept developed in political science.


The concept is particularly associated with Peter M Haas, though confusingly, it is also used by Ernst Haas the Robson Professor of government at UC Berkeley. In fact as Ernst Haas has put it: 'Actually, my son invented the term'.[1]

Criticisms

The notion of knowledge, though, is merely confined to scientific knowledge, which is perceived as rational, valid and therefore true. Moreover, as James Sebenius (1992: 324) notes in his critique on the epistemic communities approach, that knowledge and power are “treated as […] analytically separable, rather than inherently bound together”. The questions of why a certain epistemic community (and not another one) manages to gain influence in their respective nation-states and why a specific set of expert knowledge (and not another one) becomes influential in a policy field remains unclear. Focusing on scientific knowledge as the only authoritative knowledge not only obscures the existence of interpretative struggles but also the role of other forms of knowledge that might facilitate completely different policy solutions.[2]

Reading

  • Adler, Emanuel. “The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control.” International Organization. Vol. 46, No. 1. The MIT Press Winter, 1992. pp. 101-145.
  • Adler, Emanuel and Peter M. Haas. “Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program.” International Organization. Vol. 46. No. 1. Winter. MIT Press, 1992. P. 367-390.
  • Haas, E.B. (1990) When Knowledge is Power (Berkeley: University of California Press)
  • Haas, Peter M. “Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution.” International Organization. Vol. 43. No. 3. The MIT Press Summer, 1989. pp. 377-403.
  • Haas, Peter M. (1990) Saving the Mediterranean - the politics of international environmental co-operation (New York: Columbia University Press)
  • Haas, Peter M. (1992a) ‘Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy co-ordination’ in International Organization 46 (1): 1-36
  • Haas, Peter M. (1992b) ‘Obtaining International environmental protection through epistemic consensus’ in Rowlands I.H. and M. Greene (eds) Global Environmental change and international relations (Basingstoke: Macmillan)
  • Haas, Peter M. (1992c) ‘Banning Chloroflurorcarbons: Epistemic Community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone’ in International Organization 46 (1): 187-224.
  • Haas, Peter M., R.O. Keohane and M.A. Levy (eds) (1993) Institutions for the Earth (London: The MIT Press)
  • Haas, Peter M. (ed) (1997) Knowledge, Power and International Policy Co-ordination (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press)
  • Haas, Peter M. (1999) ‘Social Constructivism and the Evolution of Multilateral Governance’ in Hart, J. and Prakash, A. (eds) Globalization and Governance (London: Routledge)
  • Haas, Peter. M. and Haas, E. B. (1995) ‘Learning to Learn: improving international governance’ in Global Governance 1 (3): 255-284.
  • Kolodziej, Edward A. “Epistemic Communities Searching for Regional Cooperation.” Mershon International Studies Review. Vol. 41. No. 1 Blackwell Publishing May, 1997. pp. 93-98.
  • Sebenius, James K. “Challenging Conventional Explanations of International Cooperation: Negotiation Analysis and the Case of Epistemic Communities.” International Organization. Vol. 46, No. 1. The MIT Press Winter, 1992. pp. 323-365.
  • Thomas, Craig W. “Public Management as Interagency Cooperation: Testing Epistemic Community Theory at the Domestic Level.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. J-PART. Vol. 7. No. 2. Oxford University Press, Apr. 1997. p. 221-246.

Notes

  1. Ernst Haas Interview: Conversations with History; Institute of International Studies, UC Berkeley Science and Progress in International Relations: Conversation with Ernst B. Haas, Robson Research Professor of Government; 10/30/00 by Harry Kreisler. Page 3 of 5: Theories and Ideas
  2. Gülay Çağlar, Gender and Global Economic Governance: The Constitutive Role of Knowledge, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 50th ANNUAL CONVENTION "EXPLORING THE PAST, ANTICIPATING THE FUTURE", New York Marriott Marquis, NEW YORK CITY, NY, USA, Feb 15, 2009. 2009-11-04 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p312295_index.html>