Difference between revisions of "Epistemic community"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Epistemic Community]] is a concept developed in political science. | [[Epistemic Community]] is a concept developed in political science. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Criticisms== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :The notion of knowledge, though, is merely confined to scientific knowledge, which is perceived as rational, valid and therefore true. Moreover, as James Sebenius (1992: 324) notes in his critique on the epistemic communities approach, that knowledge and power are “treated as […] analytically separable, rather than inherently bound together”. The questions of why a certain epistemic community (and not another one) manages to gain influence in their respective nation-states and why a specific set of expert knowledge (and not another one) becomes influential in a policy field remains unclear. Focusing on scientific knowledge as the only authoritative knowledge not only obscures the existence of interpretative struggles but also the role of other forms of knowledge that might facilitate completely different policy solutions.<ref>Gülay Çağlar, [http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p312295_index.html Gender and Global Economic Governance: The Constitutive Role of Knowledge], Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 50th ANNUAL CONVENTION "EXPLORING THE PAST, ANTICIPATING THE FUTURE", New York Marriott Marquis, NEW YORK CITY, NY, USA, Feb 15, 2009. 2009-11-04 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p312295_index.html></ref> | ||
==Reading== | ==Reading== |
Revision as of 23:56, 25 November 2009
Epistemic Community is a concept developed in political science.
Criticisms
- The notion of knowledge, though, is merely confined to scientific knowledge, which is perceived as rational, valid and therefore true. Moreover, as James Sebenius (1992: 324) notes in his critique on the epistemic communities approach, that knowledge and power are “treated as […] analytically separable, rather than inherently bound together”. The questions of why a certain epistemic community (and not another one) manages to gain influence in their respective nation-states and why a specific set of expert knowledge (and not another one) becomes influential in a policy field remains unclear. Focusing on scientific knowledge as the only authoritative knowledge not only obscures the existence of interpretative struggles but also the role of other forms of knowledge that might facilitate completely different policy solutions.[1]
Reading
- Adler, Emanuel. “The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control.” International Organization. Vol. 46, No. 1. The MIT Press Winter, 1992. pp. 101-145.
- Adler, Emanuel and Peter M. Haas. “Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program.” International Organization. Vol. 46. No. 1. Winter. MIT Press, 1992. P. 367-390.
- Haas, Peter M. “Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization. Vol. 46. No. 1. Winter. MIT Press, 1992. p. 1-35.
- Haas, Peter M. “Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution.” International Organization. Vol. 43. No. 3. The MIT Press Summer, 1989. pp. 377-403.
- Kolodziej, Edward A. “Epistemic Communities Searching for Regional Cooperation.” Mershon International Studies Review. Vol. 41. No. 1 Blackwell Publishing May, 1997. pp. 93-98.
- Sebenius, James K. “Challenging Conventional Explanations of International Cooperation: Negotiation Analysis and the Case of Epistemic Communities.” International Organization. Vol. 46, No. 1. The MIT Press Winter, 1992. pp. 323-365.
- Thomas, Craig W. “Public Management as Interagency Cooperation: Testing Epistemic Community Theory at the Domestic Level.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. J-PART. Vol. 7. No. 2. Oxford University Press, Apr. 1997. p. 221-246.
Notes
- ↑ Gülay Çağlar, Gender and Global Economic Governance: The Constitutive Role of Knowledge, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 50th ANNUAL CONVENTION "EXPLORING THE PAST, ANTICIPATING THE FUTURE", New York Marriott Marquis, NEW YORK CITY, NY, USA, Feb 15, 2009. 2009-11-04 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p312295_index.html>