Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tommy"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Tommy, that's better. Still a little light on evidence and a few remaining assertive words which could be softened?? 'Shadowy networks' can you remove that phrase and substantiate the links? What other groups is it linked to? What arethe connections of the principals. Where is the [[Stockholm Network]] in all this? Let the evidence do the talking... | Tommy, that's better. Still a little light on evidence and a few remaining assertive words which could be softened?? 'Shadowy networks' can you remove that phrase and substantiate the links? What other groups is it linked to? What arethe connections of the principals. Where is the [[Stockholm Network]] in all this? Let the evidence do the talking... | ||
--[[User:David|David]] 13:28, 6 October 2007 (BST) | --[[User:David|David]] 13:28, 6 October 2007 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 'depleted' advisory board suggests it was bigger in the past? is this true? or do you mean 'small' advisory board? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also re-read the last sentence: doesn't read well. Remove last of? | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:David|David]] 14:52, 7 October 2007 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 13:52, 7 October 2007
Have a look at the pages on Scottish and Universal Investments and those linked to them. I think a wee bit of adding to the complex of Fraser related businesses would be useful.
What do you think?
--David 14:11, 9 Nov 2006 (GMT)
Can you explain the 'all over theworld' ref and who awarded him the resources or prize to do it and where he did it...? --David 16:06, 15 Nov 2006 (GMT)
Tommy, that's better. Still a little light on evidence and a few remaining assertive words which could be softened?? 'Shadowy networks' can you remove that phrase and substantiate the links? What other groups is it linked to? What arethe connections of the principals. Where is the Stockholm Network in all this? Let the evidence do the talking... --David 13:28, 6 October 2007 (BST)
'depleted' advisory board suggests it was bigger in the past? is this true? or do you mean 'small' advisory board?
Also re-read the last sentence: doesn't read well. Remove last of?
--David 14:52, 7 October 2007 (BST)
