Difference between revisions of "User talk:Steven Harkins"
(→clarify BICOM?: new section) |
|||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
[[World Economic Forum]] | [[Trilateral Commission]] | [[Bilderberg Group]] (the Economist provided the secretariat in 2008) |[[LOTIS Committee]] | [[World Economic Forum]] | [[Trilateral Commission]] | [[Bilderberg Group]] (the Economist provided the secretariat in 2008) |[[LOTIS Committee]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == clarify BICOM? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | HI Steve (copying to David as not sure who can more easily fix this) | ||
| + | |||
| + | on this page http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Britain_Israel_Communications_and_Research_Centre | ||
| + | |||
| + | we have the following: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Tim Llewellyn, a former BBC correspondent and Middle East expert had this to say about BICOM: | ||
| + | ::"The answer remains, the Zionist lobby in all it devious forms. ... | ||
| + | |||
| + | the quote leads straight into an answer when we haven't been given the question. Doesn't hang together as is, so can we include the question? and I think Llewellyn may not be speaking for himself here but for Adams and Mayhew? It isn't totally clear from the source but it seems he is just presenting in the answer what these 2 say in their book (albeit that he agrees with them)? This should be made clear in our article. Also is the source that is referenced (footnote no 6) supposed to be a version with a load of html in it? can we get a better version? | ||
| + | |||
| + | thank you! | ||
| + | --[[User:Claire Robinson|Claire Robinson]] 22:15, 17 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:15, 17 December 2009
Contents
To Do
- add quote at end of para here: http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Erinys_International#Connections_with_Apartheid_South_Africa_and_white_supremacist_Rhodesia On the precise proportions of South Africans in Erinys from Roberts email.
- Activist NGO Reports on PMC's http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Category:Private_Military_Corporations
Done
- J Street
- Blue Star PR
- HonestReporting
- James Adams (UK journalist)
- iDefense
- Airscan
- Saladin Security
- Keenie Meenie Services
- Vernon Keenan
- Didi Nelson
- Robert Friedmann
- Storey’s Gate
- Sean Cleary - career, connections with Jonas Savimbi
- Centre for European Policy Studies
- SRU - to reflect that it is no longer owned by Brunswick
- Daniel Levy Pages
- Mia Bloom(Tom)
- Centre for Scottish Public Policy
- New School of Psychology (Names)
- IDC Herzliya (People)
- Peter York
- Hydra Associates
- Alan Dershowitz
- Eric Joyce
- Peter Eigen
- Networks Central Ltd
- Ross Martin
- Transparency International (Inc associated Pages)
- Laurence Cockcroft
- Barry Rubin, List of publications (Neocon)
Newspapers/Magazines/News Outlets to be created
Daily Sport | Sunday Sport | The Spectator | Fortune | Time | Newsweek | Financial Times | The Scotsman | The Herald | CNN | Daily Express | The Daily Mirror | The People | Daily Record | Sunday Post | Sunday Mail | Daily Mail and General Trust | ITN | The Barclay Brothers | Channel 4 | Channel 5 | The Independent | The Independent on Sunday | The Observer | The Guardian | Haartez | Ma’ariv
News Owners
Daily Mail and General Trust | Guardian Media Group | Hachette Filipacchi | Newsquest plc | Scottish Media Group
Media Links
World Economic Forum | Trilateral Commission | Bilderberg Group (the Economist provided the secretariat in 2008) |LOTIS Committee
clarify BICOM?
HI Steve (copying to David as not sure who can more easily fix this)
on this page http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Britain_Israel_Communications_and_Research_Centre
we have the following:
- Tim Llewellyn, a former BBC correspondent and Middle East expert had this to say about BICOM:
- "The answer remains, the Zionist lobby in all it devious forms. ...
the quote leads straight into an answer when we haven't been given the question. Doesn't hang together as is, so can we include the question? and I think Llewellyn may not be speaking for himself here but for Adams and Mayhew? It isn't totally clear from the source but it seems he is just presenting in the answer what these 2 say in their book (albeit that he agrees with them)? This should be made clear in our article. Also is the source that is referenced (footnote no 6) supposed to be a version with a load of html in it? can we get a better version?
thank you! --Claire Robinson 22:15, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
