Difference between revisions of "The Future Foundation"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(External links)
m (Clients: typo)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Template:NuclearSpin}}
 
The Future Foundation is a London based PR company and consultancy. It is owned by [[Experian]] a market research and data management group ultiately owned by [[GUS plc]].
 
The Future Foundation is a London based PR company and consultancy. It is owned by [[Experian]] a market research and data management group ultiately owned by [[GUS plc]].
  
 +
==Nuclear Work==
  
==Nuclear Work==
+
In 2003/04 the Future Foundation was paid £31,500 by [[Nirex]] to "help facilitate external events and to help draft corporate communications materials". <ref>David Wild, [http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/9/94/Jean.PDF  Freedom of Information Request, Letter to Jean McSorley, Senior Advisor to Greenpeace UK], 15 July, 2005.</ref> This continued the work the Foundation had undertaken for Nirex over the last few years. This includes:  
In 2003/04 the Future Foundation was paid £31,500 by [[Nirex]] to "help facilitate external events and to help draft corporate communications materials".{{ref|FOI}} This continued the work the Foundation had undertaken for Nirex over the last few years. This includes:  
 
 
:Public Attitudes to the Future Management of Radioactive Waste in the UK, A report for Nirex by The Future Foundation, February 2002
 
:Public Attitudes to the Future Management of Radioactive Waste in the UK, A report for Nirex by The Future Foundation, February 2002
  
 
:Establishing the value of wider public consultation. A Report by the Future Foundation for Nirex, November, 2000.
 
:Establishing the value of wider public consultation. A Report by the Future Foundation for Nirex, November, 2000.
 +
 +
Other work undertaken by the Future Foundation for Nirex was by [[Sue Tibballs]].
  
 
==The Neo-Cromwellians==
 
==The Neo-Cromwellians==
  
The Foundation is involved in a study titled the Assault on Pleasure written by James Murphy{{ref|Murphy}}. Chris Grimshaw of Corporate Watch reports:
+
The Foundation is involved in a study titled 'The Assault on Pleasure' written by [[James Murphy]]. <ref>James Murphy [http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/d/db/Assault.pdf The Assault on Pleasure: How the marketing/communications community should review and respond to modern attempts to regulate or restrict consumer enjoyment of brands and products], Future Foundation, 2005 [http://www.modelreasoning.com/assault.pdf]</ref> Chris Grimshaw of Corporate Watch reports:
  
 
:A new study by the Future Foundation portrays opponents of unregulated corporate excess as puritanical 'Neo-Cromwellians'.
 
:A new study by the Future Foundation portrays opponents of unregulated corporate excess as puritanical 'Neo-Cromwellians'.
Line 18: Line 21:
 
:According to FF's proposal for their 'Assault on Pleasure' project, manufacturers of luxury goods may need to rethink their marketing; if advertisers position their products as well-deserved treats, what happens when society decides that such treats are no longer socially acceptable? Furthermore they warn of new and repressive regulation. At least one of FF's clients aims to use the completed report due this spring, as a lobbying resource for use in Brussels.
 
:According to FF's proposal for their 'Assault on Pleasure' project, manufacturers of luxury goods may need to rethink their marketing; if advertisers position their products as well-deserved treats, what happens when society decides that such treats are no longer socially acceptable? Furthermore they warn of new and repressive regulation. At least one of FF's clients aims to use the completed report due this spring, as a lobbying resource for use in Brussels.
  
:The report, written by FF associate, [[James Murphy]], director of the consultancy, [[Model Reasoning]], is simply daft in places. It warns that humble pleasures, including the bacon sandwich and blogging, may find themselves subject to 'incipient regulation' within another five years. Amongst those things likely to be heavily regulated the FF identifies 'biscuits at meetings'.{{ref|Grimshaw}}
+
:The report, written by FF associate, [[James Murphy]], director of the consultancy, [[Model Reasoning]], is simply daft in places. It warns that humble pleasures, including the bacon sandwich and blogging, may find themselves subject to 'incipient regulation' within another five years. Amongst those things likely to be heavily regulated the FF identifies 'biscuits at meetings'.<ref>Chris Grimshaw, '[http://www.spinwatch.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=441 The Truth Turned Upside Down]' ''Spinwatch'', 16 February, 2006.</ref>
  
 
According to Kate Zimmerman:
 
According to Kate Zimmerman:
:The Foundation - which, among other things, advises the communications and marketing community on commercial strategy - recently conducted a study of 1,000 Britons, measuring their attitudes toward certain types of pleasures. The study discovered that there are now "substantial pockets" of people in British society who want to redefine what constitutes anti-social behaviour. In particular, they'd like to eliminate activities that most of us consider to be good, clean fun.{{ref|Zimmerman}}
+
:The Foundation - which, among other things, advises the communications and marketing community on commercial strategy - recently conducted a study of 1,000 Britons, measuring their attitudes toward certain types of pleasures. The study discovered that there are now "substantial pockets" of people in British society who want to redefine what constitutes anti-social behaviour. In particular, they'd like to eliminate activities that most of us consider to be good, clean fun. <ref>Kate Zimmerman '[http://www.nsnews.com/issues05/w081305/083105/opinion/082205op3.html Assaulting pleasure - just because they can]', ''North Shore News'', 14 August, 2005.</ref>
  
 
==Clients==
 
==Clients==
  
As disclosed on their [http://www.futurefoundation.net/whatwedo.php?disp=12 website]:
+
As disclosed on their website circa 2013: <ref>[http://www.futurefoundation.net/whatwedo.php?disp=12 Future Foundation website]</ref>
 +
*[[BP]]
 +
*[[Coca Cola]]
 +
*[[HSBC]]
 +
*[[Omnicom]]
 +
*[[Hilton Worldwide]]
 +
 
 +
As disclosed on their website circa 2005-06: <ref>[http://www.futurefoundation.net/whatwedo.php?disp=12 Future Foundation website]</ref>
 
 
 
 
 
* [[Visit Scotland]]
 
* [[Visit Scotland]]
Line 32: Line 42:
 
* [[Archant]]
 
* [[Archant]]
  
==References==
+
==Contact==
*{{note|FOI}} D. Wild (2005) Freedom of Information Request, Letter to Jean McSorley, Senior Advisor to Greenpeace UK, 15 July.
+
 
*{{note|Grimshaw}}Chris Grimshaw, '[http://www.spinwatch.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=441 The Truth Turned Upside Down]' ''Spinwatch'', 16 February 2006.
+
Website: http://www.futurefoundation.net/
*{{note|Murphy}} James Murphy [http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/d/db/Assault.pdf The Assault on Pleasure: How the marketing/communications community should review and respond to modern attempts to regulate or restrict consumer enjoyment of brands and products], Future Foundation, 2005 [http://www.modelreasoning.com/assault.pdf]
+
 
*{{note|Zimmerman}} Kate Zimmerman '[http://www.nsnews.com/issues05/w081305/083105/opinion/082205op3.html Assaulting pleasure - just because they can]', ''North Shore News'', 14 August 2005.
+
==Notes==
 +
<references/>
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
  
*Future Foundation [http://www.futurefoundation.net/ website]
+
*Model Reasoning, Press Release [http://www.modelreasoning.com/report11.html The Assault on Pleasure: First market research findings], May, 2005.
*Model Reasoning, Press Release [http://www.modelreasoning.com/report11.html The Assault on Pleasure: First market research findings. May 2005]
+
 
 +
[[Category:Nuclear PR, lobbying and consultancy firms]]
 +
[[Category:Nuclear Spin]]

Latest revision as of 13:27, 1 November 2013

Nuclear spin.png This article is part of the Nuclear Spin project of Spinwatch.

The Future Foundation is a London based PR company and consultancy. It is owned by Experian a market research and data management group ultiately owned by GUS plc.

Nuclear Work

In 2003/04 the Future Foundation was paid £31,500 by Nirex to "help facilitate external events and to help draft corporate communications materials". [1] This continued the work the Foundation had undertaken for Nirex over the last few years. This includes:

Public Attitudes to the Future Management of Radioactive Waste in the UK, A report for Nirex by The Future Foundation, February 2002
Establishing the value of wider public consultation. A Report by the Future Foundation for Nirex, November, 2000.

Other work undertaken by the Future Foundation for Nirex was by Sue Tibballs.

The Neo-Cromwellians

The Foundation is involved in a study titled 'The Assault on Pleasure' written by James Murphy. [2] Chris Grimshaw of Corporate Watch reports:

A new study by the Future Foundation portrays opponents of unregulated corporate excess as puritanical 'Neo-Cromwellians'.
Last summer the strategic consultancy, the Future Foundation (FF), claimed to have discovered a new social trend in Britain - a creeping menace they call the 'New Puritans' or 'Neo-Cromwellians'. This movement of moralising killjoys are apparently pushing an 'Assault on Pleasure' in general.
According to FF's proposal for their 'Assault on Pleasure' project, manufacturers of luxury goods may need to rethink their marketing; if advertisers position their products as well-deserved treats, what happens when society decides that such treats are no longer socially acceptable? Furthermore they warn of new and repressive regulation. At least one of FF's clients aims to use the completed report due this spring, as a lobbying resource for use in Brussels.
The report, written by FF associate, James Murphy, director of the consultancy, Model Reasoning, is simply daft in places. It warns that humble pleasures, including the bacon sandwich and blogging, may find themselves subject to 'incipient regulation' within another five years. Amongst those things likely to be heavily regulated the FF identifies 'biscuits at meetings'.[3]

According to Kate Zimmerman:

The Foundation - which, among other things, advises the communications and marketing community on commercial strategy - recently conducted a study of 1,000 Britons, measuring their attitudes toward certain types of pleasures. The study discovered that there are now "substantial pockets" of people in British society who want to redefine what constitutes anti-social behaviour. In particular, they'd like to eliminate activities that most of us consider to be good, clean fun. [4]

Clients

As disclosed on their website circa 2013: [5]

As disclosed on their website circa 2005-06: [6]

Contact

Website: http://www.futurefoundation.net/

Notes

External links