Difference between revisions of "N officers 2"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{UCPI_sidebar|Name=N Officers list|Description=A list of N & HN cyphers used to designate individual officers in the Inquiry and by Operation Herne (Part 2)}}
 
{{UCPI_sidebar|Name=N Officers list|Description=A list of N & HN cyphers used to designate individual officers in the Inquiry and by Operation Herne (Part 2)}}
  
Police officers cited in the [[Undercover Policing Inquiry]] (UCPI) are generally designated by a cypher / nominal starting with N or HN followed by a number. The practice of assigning these cyphers was begun in by the Metropolitan Police inquiry [[Operation Herne]] which investigated the activities of the [[Special Demonstration Squad]] undercovers. It was subsequently adopted by [[Mark Ellison]] for his [[Ellison Review|Review]] and the UCPI, both of which draw heavily on the material assembled by Operation Herne. The practice was also taken up by [[Operation Elter]], investigating the [[National Public Order Intelligence Unit]]. The system appears to have changed in 2017, when the 3 August 2017 rulings and direction of the new Inquiry Chair, [[John Mitting]], began using the 'HN' label, though the associated numbers appear to be unchanged.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17">[https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-press-notice-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Press Release: 'Minded to' note, ruling and directions in respect of anonymity applications relating to former officers of the Special Demonstration Squad], Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 3 August 2017 (accessed 3 August 2017).</ref>  
+
Police officers cited in the [[Undercover Policing Inquiry]] (UCPI) are generally designated by a cypher / nominal starting with N or HN followed by a number. The practice of assigning these cyphers was begun in by the Metropolitan Police inquiry [[Operation Herne]] which investigated the activities of the [[Special Demonstration Squad]] undercovers. It was subsequently adopted by [[Mark Ellison]] for his [[Ellison Review|Review]] and the UCPI, both of which draw heavily on the material assembled by Operation Herne. The system appears to have changed in 2017, when the 3 August 2017 rulings and direction of the new Inquiry Chair, [[John Mitting]], began using the 'HN' label, though the associated numbers appear to be unchanged.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17">[https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-press-notice-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Press Release: 'Minded to' note, ruling and directions in respect of anonymity applications relating to former officers of the Special Demonstration Squad], Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 3 August 2017 (accessed 3 August 2017).</ref>  
 
 
The N number system appears to be applied across the board for police officers regardless of force, position or involvement with undercover policing. A few have since been identified, but many remain anonymous and as such few details of them are known. Except where profiled elsewhere, this page collates what is known of them and links to relevant documents, including relevant procedural issues within the Undercover Policing Inquiry.
 
 
 
Due to the number of offices and associated details, they list has been split into several pages. This is page 2, and covers N officers with cypher number of 100 or higher.
 
 
 
For other officers, with cypher number up to 99, see [[N_officers_1|N officers 1]].
 
  
 
For a general introduction into the cypher system, see [[N_officers| N Officers (main page)]].
 
For a general introduction into the cypher system, see [[N_officers| N Officers (main page)]].
  
* ''Updated 19 November 2017''
+
* ''Updated 10 December 2017''
  
==N series officers part 2 (>100)==
+
==N series officers part 2 (100-199)==
  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="vertical-align:top;"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="vertical-align:top;"
Line 29: Line 23:
 
| ''[[Carlo Neri (alias)]]''
 
| ''[[Carlo Neri (alias)]]''
 
| UCPI minded to restrict real name.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
| UCPI minded to restrict real name.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
| SDS UCO. Deployed against two groups March 2000 to Summer 2006. Both he and partners concerned about violence being used by (ex)members of the groups he targeted and of media intrusion, and the efforts of those with IT skills to ascertain his real name and whereabouts. "These concerns are not irrational and have some basis in fact". According to Prof Fox, (report of 8 March 2017), HN104 suffers from significant mental health conditions. Mitting opposing publishing of real name as interference under Article 8(2), and not necessary for those who claim sexual relationships with him in order to give evidence in acts committed by his cover name. "On the basis of what is known, interference in Article 8(2) rights is not justified." Can give evidence from behind a screen.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> Applications from MPS & N104's lawyer to restrict publication of real name only; also received are personal statements from his family and expert medical report; final risk assessment from MPS awaited but no scope for restriction of cover name. Open versions published.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/>
+
| SDS UCO. Deployed against two groups March 2000 to Summer 2006. Both he and partners concerned about violence being used by (ex)members of the groups he targeted and of media intrusion, and the efforts of those with IT skills to ascertain his real name and whereabouts. "These concerns are not irrational and have some basis in fact". According to Prof Fox, (report of 8 March 2017), HN104 suffers from significant mental health conditions. Mitting opposing publishing of real name as interference under Article 8(2), and not necessary for those who claim sexual relationships with him in order to give evidence in acts committed by his cover name. "On the basis of what is known, interference in Article 8(2) rights is not justified." Can give evidence from behind a screen.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> Applications from MPS & N104's lawyer to restrict publication of real name only; also received are personal statements from his family and expert medical report; final risk assessment from MPS awaited but no scope for restriction of cover name. Open versions published..<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17">David Barr &amp; Kate Wilkinson, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-counsels-explanatory-note-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Counsel to the Inquiry's explanatory note to accompany the 'Minded to' note in respect of applications for restrictions over the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstration Squad], ''Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk)'', 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).</ref>
  
In the responding submissions made by the Non-Police/State Core Participants, it was noted that Carlo's real name was known to those he had spied upon.<ref>Ruth Brander & Philippa Kaufmann QC, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/20171004-NPNSCPs-submissions-re-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Submissions on behalf of the non-police, non-state core participants re the Chairman's 'Minded To' note dated 3 August 2017 concerning restriction order applications], 5 October 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> Mitting asked the NPSCPs to reconsider their position that HN104's real name should be released<ref name="mitting.supp.minded-to.23Oct2017"/> This was declined as no further material was forthcoming from the Inquiry <ref>Ruth Brander & Philippa Kaufmann QC, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/20171106-submissions-re-SDS-tranche-1-NPNSCPs.pdf Submissions on behalf of the non-police, non-state core participants re the Chairman's 'Minded To' note dated 23 October 2017 concerning restriction order applications], 6 November 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> In his 23 October 2017 note, Mitting noted he could not prevent publication of the real name by others<ref name="mitting.supp.minded-to.23Oct2017"/> The matter was returned to during the public hearing of 21 November when it effectively recognised that the name was going to be published, the matter simply being who did it. Mitting requested that the NPSCPs stayed their hand on releasing the real name until a closed hearing to consider management of the process.<ref name="ucpi.hearing.transcript.21Nov17">[https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/20171121-Anonymity-application-hearing-day-2-Draft-Transcript.pdf Transcript of hearing of 21 November 2017], Undercover Policing Inquiry, 21 November 2017.</ref>
+
In the responding submissions made by the Non-Police/State Core Participants, it was noted that Carlo's real name was known to those he had spied upon.<ref>Ruth Brander & Philippa Kaufmann QC, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/20171004-NPNSCPs-submissions-re-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Submissions on behalf of the non-police, non-state core participants re the Chairman's 'Minded To' note dated 3 August 2017 concerning restriction order applications], 5 October 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> Mitting asked the NPSCPs to reconsider their position that HN104's real name should be released.<ref name="mitting.supp.minded-to.23Oct2017">Sir John Mitting, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/20171023-supplementary-Minded-to.pdf Supplementary 'Minded-To'], ''Undercover Policing Inquiry'', 23 October 2017 (accessed 23 October 2017 via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> This was declined as no further material was forthcoming from the Inquiry <ref>Ruth Brander & Philippa Kaufmann QC, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/20171106-submissions-re-SDS-tranche-1-NPNSCPs.pdf Submissions on behalf of the non-police, non-state core participants re the Chairman's 'Minded To' note dated 23 October 2017 concerning restriction order applications], 6 November 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> In his 23 October 2017 note, Mitting noted he could not prevent publication of the real name by others<ref name="mitting.supp.minded-to.23Oct2017"/> The matter was returned to during the public hearing of 21 November when it effectively recognised that the name was going to be published, the matter simply being who did it. Mitting requested that the NPSCPs stayed their hand on releasing the real name until a closed hearing to consider management of the process.<ref name="ucpi.hearing.transcript.21Nov17">[https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/20171121-Anonymity-application-hearing-day-2-Draft-Transcript.pdf Transcript of hearing of 21 November 2017], Undercover Policing Inquiry, 21 November 2017.</ref>
  
 
'''August 2017 application''': [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf open application for restriction order (MPS)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-application-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf open application for restriction order (S&G)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-supplemental-application-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf Open supplementary application for restriction order (S&G)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-medical-assessment.pdf open medical assessment], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-personal-statement-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf open personal statement (1)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-additional-personal-statement-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf open personal statement (2)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-personal-statement-2-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf open statement by HN104's partner], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-personal-statement-3-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf open statement by HN104's relative]
 
'''August 2017 application''': [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf open application for restriction order (MPS)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-application-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf open application for restriction order (S&G)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-supplemental-application-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf Open supplementary application for restriction order (S&G)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-medical-assessment.pdf open medical assessment], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-personal-statement-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf open personal statement (1)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-additional-personal-statement-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf open personal statement (2)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-personal-statement-2-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf open statement by HN104's partner], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN104-Open-personal-statement-3-from-Slater-Gordon.pdf open statement by HN104's relative]
Line 153: Line 147:
 
| HN294
 
| HN294
 
| ''unknown''
 
| ''unknown''
| Cover name not ascertained by UCPI.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: real name cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17">John Mitting, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-Minded-to.pdf In the matter of section 19(3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations Squad ‘Minded to’ note], ''Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk)'', 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).</ref>
+
| Ruling (December 2017): real name cannot be published.<ref name=ucpi.ruling.5Dec17"/> Cover name not ascertained by UCPI.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/>
| SDS UCO & managerial. Now deceased. Deployed in 1968-1969 against one group which no longer exists, and reported on others, which also no longer exist. Managerial position in SDS 1969-1974. Has elderly widow & other family members. "There is no risk to their safety and minimal risk of intrusive interest in them even if his real name were to be published. They wish to avoid that risk. Although the risk is minimal, nothing would be gained by running it. Unless HN294’s cover name were to become known, publication of his real name could not prompt evidence from one or more members of the affected groups. Evidence about his managerial role, if it is available, can be given by others who knew him, by reference to his cypher. In those circumstances, interference with the right of his widow and family to respect for their private life under Article 8 of the European Convention would not be justifiable under Article 8(2)."<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> Application from MPS for restricting real name, along with evidence from family and a risk assessment - open versions published.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/>
+
| SDS UCO & managerial. Now deceased. Deployed in 1968-1969 against one group which no longer exists, and reported on others, which also no longer exist. Managerial position in SDS 1969-1974, though the nature of this is not established. Has elderly widow & other family members.<ref name=ucpi.ruling.5Dec17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 +
 
 +
An application was made by the MPS to restricting real name, submitted along with evidence from family and a risk assessment - of which open versions were published in August 2017.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/>
 +
 
 +
In his 'Minded-to' (Aug 2017), Mitting said that he was intended to restrict the real name, noting:<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17">John Mitting, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-Minded-to.pdf In the matter of section 19(3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations Squad ‘Minded to’ note], ''Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk)'', 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).</ref>
 +
::There is no risk to their safety and minimal risk of intrusive interest in them even if his real name were to be published. They wish to avoid that risk. Although the risk is minimal, nothing would be gained by running it. Unless HN294’s cover name were to become known, publication of his real name could not prompt evidence from one or more members of the affected groups. Evidence about his managerial role, if it is available, can be given by others who knew him, by reference to his cypher. In those circumstances, interference with the right of his widow and family to respect for their private life under Article 8 of the European Convention would not be justifiable under Article 8(2).
 +
 
 +
'''August 2017 application''': [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf Open application for restriction order], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf open risk assessment (Brian Lockie)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-personal-statement-1-from-the-MPS.pdf open personal statement (1)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-personal-statement-2-from-the-MPS.pdf open personal statement (2)]
 +
 
 +
The application was heard at the hearing of 21 November 2017,<ref name="ucpi.hearing.transcript.21Nov17"/> with Mitting ruling in favour of restricting the real name on 5 December. The grounds for the ruling were intereference with the rights of the widow (a family member had written on her behalf) despite their being 'no risk to the safety of his widow and family and minimal risk of intrusive media interest in them if his real name were to be published)'. He also said the submission that the chance the public being able to provide details of HN294's time undercover if they had his real name was 'fanciful', so the real name was not needed to fulfil the Inquiry's terms of reference.<ref name=ucpi.ruling.5Dec17"/> The [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/20171208-restriction-order-HN294.pdf Restriction Order] was issued on 8 December 2017.
  
August 2017 documents: [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf Open application for restriction order], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf open risk assessment (Brian Lockie)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-personal-statement-1-from-the-MPS.pdf open personal statement (1)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-personal-statement-2-from-the-MPS.pdf open personal statement (2)]
 
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN297
 
| HN297
Line 162: Line 164:
 
| Cover name released<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: real name cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
| Cover name released<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: real name cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Deceased. Deployed 1974-1976. "As in the case of the living officers cited above it is unlikely that the publication of his real name would prompt the giving or production of evidence necessary to permit the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. It would be likely to interfere with the right of his widow."<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> The MPS have submitted an [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN297-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf application to restrict his real name], along with a [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN297-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf risk assessment (Graham Walker)] and additional threat assessments - open versions published along with cover name.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Deceased. Deployed 1974-1976. "As in the case of the living officers cited above it is unlikely that the publication of his real name would prompt the giving or production of evidence necessary to permit the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. It would be likely to interfere with the right of his widow."<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> The MPS have submitted an [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN297-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf application to restrict his real name], along with a [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN297-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf risk assessment (Graham Walker)] and additional threat assessments - open versions published along with cover name.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/>
 +
 +
The application was heard at the hearing of 21 November 2017, where it was brought to the Inquiry's attention there was credible information that HN297 had conducted several relationships while undercover. Mitting noted this changed things, and asked for further information from the non-police/state core participants before making his ruling.<ref name="ucpi.hearing.transcript.21Nov17"/><ref name=ucpi.ruling.5Dec17"/> An application for core participancy by Richard Chessum, whom Gibson had spied upon and was able to provide information on said relationships, was accepted by Mitting on 5 December 2017.<ref>Sir John Mitting, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/20171204-ruling-core-participants-number-15-pdf.pdf Core Participants Ruling 15: Richard Chessum], ''Undercover Policing Inquiry'', 4 December 2017.</ref>
 +
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN298
 
| HN298
Line 171: Line 176:
 
No application made for his cover name to be restricted. Regarding his application to have his real name restricted, Mitting noted:<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
No application made for his cover name to be restricted. Regarding his application to have his real name restricted, Mitting noted:<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
:: It is possible that, if his cover name is published, members of the groups against whom he was deployed will remember him and be able to give evidence about him. For that to happen, it is not necessary that his real name should be published. He has politely declined to cooperate with the Metropolitan Police risk assessor. In consequence, the Inquiry does not know whether he wishes to protect his real name. If he were to do so, and no new information adverse to him were to emerge, the interference with right to respect for his private life under Article 8(2) of the European Convention which would be occasioned by publication of his real name would not be justified. For the time being, on the application of the Metropolitan Police Service, his real name should not be published. This decision will be reviewed when he has made his own position clear.
 
:: It is possible that, if his cover name is published, members of the groups against whom he was deployed will remember him and be able to give evidence about him. For that to happen, it is not necessary that his real name should be published. He has politely declined to cooperate with the Metropolitan Police risk assessor. In consequence, the Inquiry does not know whether he wishes to protect his real name. If he were to do so, and no new information adverse to him were to emerge, the interference with right to respect for his private life under Article 8(2) of the European Convention which would be occasioned by publication of his real name would not be justified. For the time being, on the application of the Metropolitan Police Service, his real name should not be published. This decision will be reviewed when he has made his own position clear.
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN301
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Minded-to (Nov 2017): Real name name cannot be published;<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> cover name to be published.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Deployed 1971-76 into the International Socialists (which became subsumed into another [Socialist Workers Party]), and reported on others. No allegations of misconduct against him.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
 
Mitting noted (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
:: Publication of his cover name, which will occur, is all that is required to prompt evidence from those who encountered him in his undercover role, if they have any to give. Publication of his real name is unnecessary. It would also be a disproportionate and unjustified interference in his and his family’s right to respect for their private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention. It would not be difficult to trace him if his real name were published. His family circumstances, which are fully set out in his impact statement, require that there should be no avoidable interference in them, even of a kind produced only by publicity resulting from legitimate media interest.
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| N315
 
| ''unknown''
 
|
 
| Witness Protection Unit officer assigned by John Grieve to Lawrence family following wrongful publication of witness details in a Macpherson Report appendix; said they were 'never approached by any member of the MPS or asked for personal information or rumour surrounding the Stephen Lawrence family' (Herne II, 21.2.4-5).<ref name="herne.2"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| N318
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real name to be published.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS managerial / back office. Deceased. No restriction order applications made.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN321
 
| ''[[Bill Lewis (alias)|Bill Lewis]]''
 
| Minded-To: real name cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/><ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
| Now in 70s. Deployed against two groups which no longer exist, for one year Sept 1968-Sept 1969; no known allegation of misconduct against him.
 
 
A press release of 5 October 2017 stated:
 
::"HN321 was deployed as a member of the Special Operations Squad in 1968 – 1969. He had the cover name “William Paul Lewis”, although he has said that he was known simply as “Bill”. He may have been encountered by individuals involved with the International Marxist Group or the Vietnam Solidarity Campaign in London at that time."<ref name=HN321.pr.5Oct2017">Undercover Policing Inquiry, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/20171005-press-release-HN321.pdf Press Notice: No cover name anonymity sought in respect of HN321], ''UCPI.org.uk'', 5 October 2017 (accessed 10 October 2017).</ref>
 
 
Mitting's 'Minded-To' of August 2017 noted:
 
::"He undertook the role of an undercover officer on the understanding that his identity would be kept secret. He is concerned about possible media interest if his real identity were to be revealed. He is, in particular, concerned about the impact on his wife, also in her 70s. His concerns are not irrational. In the unlikely event that disclosure of his cover name, which can be made, prompts evidence from one or more members of the target groups it will not be enhanced by disclosure of his real name. It is likely that disclosure of his real name would prompt intense and unwelcome media interest in him and so would give rise to serious interference with his and his family’s right to respect for their private life under Article 8 of the European Convention which would not be justifiable under Article 8(2). Closed reasons accompany this note."<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
 
Application made by the MPS to [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf restrict real and cover names], including an [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-HN330-HN333-HN343-supplementary-submissions-from-DL.pdf supplementary submission], along with a [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-Open-personal-statement-from-the-DL-team.pdf personal statement] and a [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf risk assessment (David Reid)] - open versions published in August 2017.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/>
 
 
Following the publishing of Mitting's Minded-To note of 3 August 2017, the Metropolitan Police withdrew their application to restrict HN321's cover name, leading it to being published on 5 October 2017, though the application to restrict his real name remained in place.<ref name=HN321.pr.5Oct2017"/>
 
 
In their personal witness statement, HN321 says:<ref>'NH321', [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-Open-personal-statement-from-the-DL-team.pdf Open personal witness statement of N321 (redacted)], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 30 March 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref>
 
:: The Special Branch was a covert entity and while the public knew it existed, its activities were secret. My understanding when I joined the Special Branch was that I was not to discuss its activities outside of the service and my expectation of the Branch was that my identity would also be kept secret. I recall that at the Induction presentation into the Branch that we were warned that we would have access to secret information that we were not to reveal to anyone outside of the Police or to even acknowledge that we were members of the Special Branch. This seemed entirely reasonable to me and for nearly fifty years I have kept faith with that understanding.
 
 
According to his risk assessment:<ref>David Reid, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN321 Open Risk Assessment], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2015 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref>
 
::* 3.3 N321 received no training and no psychometric testing. N321 was told that N321 needed to gather intelligence, but the senior officers left it to the squad members to work out their own approach. There was no particular methodology advocated by officers and N321 simply used whatever techniques looked the most promising. To a certain extent the approach had to be tailored to the group that were to be penetrated.
 
::* They did not use the identity of a dead child.
 
 
N321 is not a core participant.
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN322
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Minded-to (Nov 2017): Real name name cannot be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Now in 70s; had 30-year police career, retiring in mid-1990s. With Special Operations Squad for two months in 1968; in his recollection, he was intended to be deployed against a group (which no longer exists) but was re-allocated to other duties before being deployed. Had no cover name.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
 
Mitting noted (Nov 2017):
 
::In the unlikely event that he is required to provide evidence to the Inquiry, publication of his real name will serve no useful purpose. The interference which it would occasion with his right to respect for his private life would not be justified.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN323
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real name to be used in due course.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Now deceased and no records of cover name have been found. No restriction order application made.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN325
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real name to be published in due course.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/>. No application made.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS back office / manager
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN326
 
| ''[[Douglas Edwards (alias)]]''
 
| Cover name name released<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/>. No application made.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Currently in 70s and retired; deployed against 3 groups, two of which no longer exist, for 2 1/2 years between 1968-1971. "He has been careful to preserve his anonymity and is worried about disclosure of his real name. He is concerned that it may be discovered by organisations such as undercoverresearch.net and fears media intrusion. He suffers from conditions which may be exacerbated by worry. His cover name will be published."<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
 
Application from MPS to [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN326-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf restrict real name only], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN326-Open-personal-statement-from-the-MPS.pdf personal statement], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN326-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf risk assessment (Kevin Shanahan)] and additional threat assessments - open versions published bar on additional threat assessments.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/>
 
 
In his personal statement, he wrote:<ref>'HN326', [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN326-Open-personal-statement-from-the-MPS.pdf Open personal statement of HN326], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref>
 
:: Discretion and secrecy was the order of the day - ''stum und krum''. Say nothing about anything. this was communicated to me right from the very start. Even other members of my unit were not aware of my undercover name and which groups I infiltrated. It was very much "keep quiet about the whole thing". To be honest, I can't recall a conversation about secrecy at the end of my deployment. It was just the nature of the job that you didn't talk about it.
 
:: ... At the time of my deployment, I was living with my parents. I told them I was on the Drugs squad...
 
 
According to his risk assessment:<ref>Kevin Shanahan, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN326-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf Open risk assessment for HN326], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref>
 
:: He was recruited by Special Branch management into the Special Operations Squad, whose function was to monitor protest groups who were a major concern of the Government. He had no formal induction or form of training (3.3).
 
:: "3.4 At the time of his recruitment was informed by his senior management (Detective Chief Inspector & Detective Inspector) that the Unit he was seconded to was highly secret and was to be deployed as a result of ongoing large-scale public disorder being a major concern of the Government at that time (late 1968)."
 
:: NOt offered or provided with support during his deployment; it was ad hoc and uncoordinated (4.19).
 
:: After deployment, he resumed duties in Special Branch (4.16)
 
See under profile for more detailed analysis of his time undercover.
 
 
He did not use the identity of a dead child.
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN327
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real names to be used in due course.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Deceased. No record of cover name and no application made in respect of the real name.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN328
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real name to be published in due course.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS back office / manager. No restriction order application made.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN329
 
| ''[[John Graham (alias)]]''
 
| Cover name released.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: real name cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Now in 70s. Deployed against two groups that no longer exist for one year in 1968-1969. As with HN321, only less concerned about media intrusion.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> MPS have [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN329-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf applied to restrict real name only], and issued a [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN329-Open-personal-statement-from-the-MPS.pdf open personal / impact statement] from him alongside a [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN329-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf open risk assessment (David Reid)].<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/>
 
 
For details and analysis of his time undercover see his profile. He has subsequently made appearances on television under his real identity.<ref>'HN329', [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN329-Open-personal-statement-from-the-MPS.pdf Open personal statement], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 30 March 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref>
 
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN330
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Minded-to (Aug & Sept 2017): cover name to be published subject of receipt of any application to restrict it. Real name to be restricted (Aug & Nov 2017).<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> Previously cover name had not been ascertained, but there was still intention to restrict real name.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Now in 80s; deployed against one group, no longer active, for several weeks in 1968. "He would like to be left in peace". Does not remember the cover names he used, similar considerations apply as HN321.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> He targeted the Havering, Essex branch of the Vietnam Solidarity Campaign, attending some of their meetings, both public and private. He created a false name and occupation. He ceased his undercover deployment with the Special Operations Squad on 27th October 1968, following the large VSC march which the unit had focused on.<ref name="hn329.ps.Apr17">HN329, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-personal-statement.pdf Open personal statement (redacted)], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', April 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref>
 
 
In an email to the risk assessors he stated:<ref>David Reid, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN330 open risk assessment], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref>
 
:: I am puzzled by your reference to my “cover name”. I did have rather a large number of them… I would, however, emphasise that between those dates I did not join any political party, group or organisation. I was present at hundreds of political meeting, joined many public demonstrations and protests throughout the [Metropolitan Police District] and knocked on hundreds of doors. In all cases and for obvious reasons my true identity remained unknown and when avoidable I gave a false name and occupation...”
 
 
In October 2017, it was noted:<ref name="mitting.supp.minded-to.23Oct2017">Sir John Mitting, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/20171023-supplementary-Minded-to.pdf Supplementary 'Minded-To'], ''Undercover Policing Inquiry'', 23 October 2017 (accessed 23 October 2017 via UCPI.org.uk).</ref>
 
When the ‘Minded to’ dated 3 August 2017 was published, the Inquiry did not know HN330’s cover name and HN330 could not remember it.
 
The Inquiry has since received information from another officer which permits HN330’s cover name to be published. Legal representatives of this officer and the Metropolitan Police Service have been notified and, provided that no application for a restriction order in respect
 
of it is received, it will be [released].
 
 
The MPS have [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf applied to restrict his real name only] along with [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-HN330-HN333-HN343-supplementary-submissions-from-DL.pdf open submissions], a [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-personal-statement.pdf personal statement] and [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf risk assessment (David Reid)] - open versions published.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17">David Barr &amp; Kate Wilkinson, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-counsels-explanatory-note-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Counsel to the Inquiry's explanatory note to accompany the 'Minded to' note in respect of applications for restrictions over the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstration Squad], ''Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk)'', 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).</ref>
 
 
In his personal statement, he has described the risk assessment process as a 'pantomime' and based on 'hearsay obtained from a former colleague'.<ref name="hn329.ps.Apr17"/>
 
 
He is not a core participant, and has expressed to risk assessors (whom he has declined to meet) "he has the ‘most monumental indifference’ to whether the Inquiry wishes him to give evidence."<ref>David Reid, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN330 open risk assessment (redacted)], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN331
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Minded-to (Nov 2017): restrict real name<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Deployed against one group (now defunct) in 1968 & 1969. Cover name is unknown. Killed in road traffic accident in the 1970s leaving a widow and son.
 
 
According to Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
:: HN331’s death caused his widow to suffer an acute mental illness, for which she received in-patient treatment. She did not remarry. She is now in her 70s and suffers from the early stages of dementia. According to her son, she has been deeply affected by the possibility that HN331’s identity might be revealed in the course of the Inquiry. No useful purpose would be served by publication of HN331’s real name. Given the nature of his deployment and the elapse of time since it occurred, it is inconceivable that it would prompt evidence from others about his deployment. His widow and surviving family are entitled to be left in peace.
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN332
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Minded-to: restrict real name.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS managerial role in the 1970s.
 
 
Mitting stated (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
:: HN332 is in his eighties and in poor health. The Inquiry has been provided with a short medical report itemising the serious medical conditions from which he suffers, including one which is life-threatening. His daughter has provided a witness statement in which she says that he suffers from a very poor memory and from confusion. It must, therefore, be unlikely that he could provide useful evidence to the Inquiry.
 
:: He served in the Special Operations Squad/Special Demonstration Squad in a managerial capacity in the 1970’s. He was the signatory of a significant memorandum dated 17 December 1971. But for his age and health, I would have refused the application for a restriction order in respect of his real name, on the basis that a senior public servant should be willing and, if not, required, to account for his actions publicly. For the reasons explained, no useful purpose would be served by adopting that course; and to do so would risk impairing the peace of mind and even health of a man in his twilight years. I am minded to make a restriction order which will be in place during his life.
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN333
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Cover name known.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: real and cover names cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Now in his 70s and retired. Deployed for 9 months in 1968-1969 against a left-wing group (no longer exists). No known allegation of misconduct against him and he neither committed any crimes or took the identity of a dead child as part of his cover. Described his training as 'rudimentary'. Hei infiltrated his target group by answering an advert for people who were following the philosophy of [redacted]. Subsequently attended meetings of this small group.  He characterised the group as extremist.<ref name="hn333.ps.May2017">'HN333', [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN333-Open-personal-statement-from-DL.pdf Open personal statement (redacted)], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 25 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> <ref name="hn333.ra.May2017">Graham Walker, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN333-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN333 Open risk assessment], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 2 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref>
 
 
"N333 received no specific assurance or guarantee of anonymity by senior officer(s). N333 states that there was only 'implied implication' of future anonymity'.<ref name="hn333.ra.May2017"/> He subsequently went on to have a 'long and distinguished career' in the police.<ref name="hn333.ps.May2017"/>
 
 
Mitting stated in his Minded-To:<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
::"If his cover name were to be disclosed, it is very unlikely that it would prompt evidence from one or more members of the target group which would assist the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. It would also be unlikely to prompt a threat to his personal safety or to that of his family. There is, however, a small – in my judgement, very small – risk that if his cover name were to be associated with the valuable duties which he performed subsequent to his deployment, he would be of interest to those who might pose such a threat. The nature of that risk is set out more fully in the closed reasons which accompany this note."
 
 
The MPS has [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN333-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf applied to restrict real name only], while N333's designated laywer has [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN333-Open-application-from-DL.pdf applied to restrict the cover name]. Other August 2017 application documents: [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-HN330-HN333-HN343-supplementary-submissions-from-DL.pdf open submissions], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN333-Open-personal-statement-from-DL.pdf personal statement] and [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN333-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf risk assessment (Graham Walker)].<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/>
 
 
HN333 is not a core participant in the Inquiry.
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN334
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real name cannot be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Currently in 70s. No allegation of misconduct against her. Served with Special Operations Squad 1968-72. 'In 1968 she was deployed for several months against one group - the Vietnam Solidarity Campaign, which no longer exists - as the girlfriend of HN330. Thereafter, according to her own recollection, she performed back office duties only.'<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
 
Mitting noted she wished to 'preserve her privacy and that of her family', and it was unlikely that surviving members of the groups she targeted would recall her.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN335
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real name to be used in due course.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Deceased. No record of cover name and no application made to restrict real name.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN336
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Minded-to: Real name cannot be published; cover name will be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Deployed 1969-1972, targeting the International Marxist Group and British Communist Party, but also providing intelligence on other groups. No allegation of misconduct known. Appeared on 'True Spies' programme under the pseudonym 'Dan' with the approval of senior officers.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
 
Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
:: Publication of his cover name, which will occur, will permit any member still living of the groups with whom he was involved to give evidence about him. Publication of his real name would serve no useful purpose. The infringement of his right to respect for his private and family life and that of his family would not be justified under Article 8(2) of the European Convention.
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN337
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Minded-to: Neither real or cover names can be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS UCO &amp; manager. In his 70s. Deployed against four groups in the 1970s. Later a manager in the SDS in the 1990s where he was responsible for the recruitment and deployment of N81, though played no role in the targeting of the Lawrences.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
 
According to Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
:: Associates of those with whom HN337 came into contact during the deployment pose a real but unquantifiable risk to life and safety. It is possible that if the cover name were published other individuals who pose no risk to HN337 could give evidence about HN337 which might be of interest to the Inquiry. There is no known allegation of misconduct, arising out of the deployment against HN337; and none is likely to be made.
 
:: HN337 does not live in the United Kingdom. There is, accordingly, no statutory means by which this officer can be compelled to provide evidence to the Inquiry. The evidence which can be given is likely to be of value to the Inquiry. It can only be obtained with HN337’s cooperation. It is likely that all of the evidence about this deployment and some of it about the discharge of managerial duties will be given in closed session. The evidence about HN81 can be given in open session, with measures taken to protect identity. Its cogency should not thereby be substantially diminished and it will be open to challenge by those who know HN337’s identity.
 
:: Even if it were unnecessary to make the restriction order sought for the reasons explained above, disclosure of real and/or cover names would interfere with the right to respect for private and family life of HN337 and partner, who suffers from a long-term physical health condition. It would only be necessary to re-examine the justification for this interference if, contrary to HN337’s declared intention, HN337 declines to cooperate with the Inquiry.
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN338
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Minded-to: real name cannot be published. <ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Cover name and target groups unknown; deployed for a period in 1970 or 1971. Deceased. Mitting is minded-to (Nov 2017) restrict publication of real name to avoid distress to HN338's widow.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN339
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Extension sought to deal with in a future tranche.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
|
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN341
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Minded-to: restrict both cover and real names.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Deployed in the 1970s against two groups.
 
 
Mitting (Nov 2017):
 
:: he deployment was potentially dangerous. If the true identity were now to be disclosed there would be a real, but unquantifiable, risk to HN341’s life and safety. There is a significant risk that publication of the cover name would permit individuals who might wish HN341 harm to discover the true identity. I am not prepared to run that risk. Nor is it necessary to do so to permit the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. There is no known allegation of misconduct against HN341 and, given the nature of the deployment, it is unlikely that members of the groups against which HN341 was deployed would wish to provide evidence to the Inquiry.
 
:: Further, worry about the possibility that HN341’s identity might be disclosed has caused great concern to HN341’s partner who is gravely ill. Even if the only right of HN341 and HN341’s partner were their right to respect for private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention interference with that right would be neither justified nor proportionate under Article 8(2).
 
:: Careful thought will need to be given to the manner in which the evidence of HN341 will be received. These reasons are supplemented and explained in greater detail in the accompanying closed note.
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN342
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Extension sought to deal with in a future tranche.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
|
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN343
 
| ''unknown''
 
| UCPI needs more details before making decision on restricting details.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: "The real name cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> Cover name to be published.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. In 70s. Deployed into various groups in the early 1970s; past kept secret from everyone his family & social circles.
 
 
The inquiry has noted:<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
:: HN343 is still economically active and has a legitimate concern, the cause of which cannot be stated in this document, that if oral evidence were to be given without steps being taken to conceal identity, HN343 would be the subject of media interest which would impair personal and economic life. If HN343 is required to give oral evidence, it is likely that protective measures will have to be taken. Pending receipt of further information, no decision can yet be made about the publication of the cover name.
 
 
Application from MPS to restrict real name only. Open versions of documents not yet published pending final application.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN344
 
| ''unknown''
 
| UCPI needs more details before making decision on restricting details.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN345
 
| ''unknown''
 
|  Minded-to: real name to be restricted; cover name to be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
----
 
Previously thought to be deceased but since discovered to be alive.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/> UCPI granted extension until 1 September 2017 to submit anonymity application.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. Deployed for six months in 1971, though not against anyone specific groups - reported on several including those opposed to apartheid. Deployment ceased when his probationary period in Special Branch was terminated. "There is a difference between his recollection of the reason for termination and that recorded in his personnel file. He left the Metropolitan Police Service soon after." No known allegation of misconduct.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
 
Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
:: Since leaving the Metropolitan Police Service, he has worked in a variety of jobs and is still working. Publication of his real name would risk impairing his current source of income. It would also serve no useful purpose. It would involve some interference with his right to respect for private life under Article 8 of the European Convention the right to disclose his true identity for purposes of his choosing and to withhold disclosure for other purposes. Although the interference would not be great, it would be disproportionate to any end which it would serve, principally to permit the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. Accordingly, it would not be justified under Article 8(2).
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN346
 
| ''unknown''
 
|  Minded-to: Real name to be published.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS. Deceased. No cover name known and no restriction order application has been made.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN347
 
| ''unknown''
 
|  Minded-to: Real name cannot be published;<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> cover name to be published<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. In his 70s. Deployed against the Irish National Liberation Solidarity Front 1971-1973.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
 
Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
:: He is said to be concerned about the physical safety of himself and his family if his real name were to be published and is concerned about the risk of media intrusion and the impact which this might have on his family. The latter concern is not irrational. In the unlikely event that any member of the group targeted who is still living may be prompted into giving evidence about his deployment, publication of his cover name, which will occur, will provide that prompt. Publication of his real name would serve no useful purpose. The infringement of his right to respect for his private and family life and that of his family would not be justified under Article 8 (2) of the European Convention. A closed note accompanies these reasons.
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN348
 
| ''unknown''
 
|  Minded-to: Real name cannot be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS UCO. In her 70s. Deployed 1972-1973 against a non-violent group. Cover name not recalled and no official record of it exists - though she recalls one element of the name which will be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
 
Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/>
 
:: ''[The cover name fragment]'' may prompt evidence from former members of the group. Publication of her real name could not do so. She is concerned about the impact of media attention upon her private and family life and upon that of her family. Her concern is not irrational. Because publication of her real name would serve no useful purpose, the infringement of her right to respect for private and family life and that of her family would not be justified under Article 8(2) of the European Convention.
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN353
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Extension sought to move to a future tranche; full extent of restriction sought is unknown.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| N367
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Further information required before Inquiry can proceed with the application.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
| SO15 / CTC from 2006, Det. Sgt; point of contact for ex-SDS officers. Was contacted by N81 in this capacity but was accused of having 'an agenda to belittle SDS' (Ellison, 253).<ref name="ellison.1"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| N406
 
| Barry McDowell
 
|
 
| Special Branch officer who moved to Racial and Violent Crime Task Force (CO24 / under John Grieve) and was appointed as a liaison between the two units 1998/1999 (Herne II, 21.1.6; Ellison, multiple pages).<ref name="herne.2"/><ref name="ellison.1"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| N519
 
| ''[[Marco Jacobs (alias)]]''
 
| Cover name confirmed.<ref>[https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/161110-press-notice-N519.pdf Update on anonymity applications - N519 (“Marco Jacobs”)], Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 10 November 2016 (accessed 5 August 2017).</ref>
 
| NPOIU UCO
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| N587
 
| ''unknown''
 
|
 
| Author of the SDS Annual Report in 1985 (Herne II, 18.1).<ref name="herne.2"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN593
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Minded to: real name to be published (no restriction order application made)<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS management / back-office. Deceased.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| N596
 
| ''[[Rod Richardson (alias)]]''
 
| Cover name Confirmed.<ref>[https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/161215-press-notice-N596.pdf No anonymity sought for undercover identity ‘Rod Richardson’], Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 15 December 2016 (accessed 5 August 2017).</ref>
 
| NPOIU UCO
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN1251
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real name to be published in due course.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/>
 
| SDS back office / manager. No application for a restriction order made.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN1668
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real name to be published in due course.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS back office / manager. No application for a restriction order made.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN2152
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real name to be published in due course.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS back office / manager. No application for a restriction order made.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN3093
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real name to be published in due course.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS back office / manager. No application for a restriction order made.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| HN3095
 
| ''unknown''
 
| Real name to be published in due course.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
| SDS back office / manager. No application for a restriction order made.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/>
 
 
|}
 
|}
  

Revision as of 11:19, 10 December 2017


URG logo 1.png

This article is part of the Undercover Research Portal at Powerbase: investigating corporate and police spying on activists.


Part of a series on the
Undercover
Policing Inquiry
N Officers list
Description: A list of N & HN cyphers used to designate individual officers in the Inquiry and by Operation Herne (Part 2)

Police officers cited in the Undercover Policing Inquiry (UCPI) are generally designated by a cypher / nominal starting with N or HN followed by a number. The practice of assigning these cyphers was begun in by the Metropolitan Police inquiry Operation Herne which investigated the activities of the Special Demonstration Squad undercovers. It was subsequently adopted by Mark Ellison for his Review and the UCPI, both of which draw heavily on the material assembled by Operation Herne. The system appears to have changed in 2017, when the 3 August 2017 rulings and direction of the new Inquiry Chair, John Mitting, began using the 'HN' label, though the associated numbers appear to be unchanged.[1]

For a general introduction into the cypher system, see N Officers (main page).

  • Updated 10 December 2017

N series officers part 2 (100-199)

Cypher Name Status Notes
HN101 unknown SDS. Contemporary of Peter Francis, who had 'an involvement in Stephen Lawrence campaign issues' according to Lambert (Ellison, p. 214).[2]
HN104 Carlo Neri (alias) UCPI minded to restrict real name.[1][3] SDS UCO. Deployed against two groups March 2000 to Summer 2006. Both he and partners concerned about violence being used by (ex)members of the groups he targeted and of media intrusion, and the efforts of those with IT skills to ascertain his real name and whereabouts. "These concerns are not irrational and have some basis in fact". According to Prof Fox, (report of 8 March 2017), HN104 suffers from significant mental health conditions. Mitting opposing publishing of real name as interference under Article 8(2), and not necessary for those who claim sexual relationships with him in order to give evidence in acts committed by his cover name. "On the basis of what is known, interference in Article 8(2) rights is not justified." Can give evidence from behind a screen.[3] Applications from MPS & N104's lawyer to restrict publication of real name only; also received are personal statements from his family and expert medical report; final risk assessment from MPS awaited but no scope for restriction of cover name. Open versions published..[4]

In the responding submissions made by the Non-Police/State Core Participants, it was noted that Carlo's real name was known to those he had spied upon.[5] Mitting asked the NPSCPs to reconsider their position that HN104's real name should be released.[6] This was declined as no further material was forthcoming from the Inquiry [7] In his 23 October 2017 note, Mitting noted he could not prevent publication of the real name by others[6] The matter was returned to during the public hearing of 21 November when it effectively recognised that the name was going to be published, the matter simply being who did it. Mitting requested that the NPSCPs stayed their hand on releasing the real name until a closed hearing to consider management of the process.[8]

August 2017 application: open application for restriction order (MPS), open application for restriction order (S&G), Open supplementary application for restriction order (S&G), open medical assessment, open personal statement (1), open personal statement (2), open statement by HN104's partner, open statement by HN104's relative

HN108 unknown real name to be published in due course.[1] No application made.[3] SDS back office / manager
HN109 unknown Extension sought to move to future tranche (Nov 2017).[9] SDS Detective Inspector in 1995. Interview by Operation Herne quoted in Ellison Review: "There was never any reference made to ‘smearing’ in relation to the Lawrence family. Deployments into the support campaigns surrounding Stephen Lawrence were specifically to build a picture of the public order background… Any meeting I was involved in was never about any family member. It was done to protect the family" (Ellison, p.211).[2]
N118 Simon Wellings (alias) Confirmed.[10] SDS UCO
HN120 unknown real name to be published in due course.[1] No application made.[3] SDS back office / manager
HN123 unknown Ruling: restrict both cover name and real name.[11] SDS UCO. Deployed into a number of left-wing groups 1993-1998, one of which 'advocated and practiced teh use of violence'. Retired from MPS on health grounds & later diagnosed with a mental health condition in part derived from his deployment - in slow but incomplete recovery.[3][11] Said to have played a part in activities connected to the spying on the Lawrences, including by Peter Francis' barrister at the hearing of 21 November (Ms Sikand stated that the group HN123 infiltrated interacted with the Lawrences), but the extent to which that happened is disputed.[8][11]

In August 2017, Mitting indicated he was minded to restrict both the cover and real name of HN123:[1][3] "HN123 and HN123’s partner are concerned about the possibility that HN123’s identity will be revealed during the Inquiry, both for reasons of safety and because of the potential impact on HN123’s health. I have read personal statements by both of them, which are and will remain closed, in which these concerns are expressed. I accept that they are genuine and not irrational. Overriding them would interfere with their right to respect for private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention and would require to be justified under Article 8(2). Fulfilment of the terms of reference of the Inquiry does not require that the real or cover name of HN123 be published. The evidence of HN123 can be given under a cypher. HN123 was involved indirectly in deployments affecting the Lawrence family and can give evidence about that under the cypher. To the extent that it is contentious, it can be challenged just as effectively, as if given in the real or cover name. In those circumstances, the interference would not be justified. It is desirable, and may be essential, that HN123 gives evidence in public. In that event, protective measures are likely to be required."[3]

An application was made by both the MPS & HN123's lawyer to restrict both cover and real names, accompanied with personal statements & medical material - of which open versions were published, some material having previously being released in March 2016.[4]

The restriction application was discussed at the hearing of 21 November where it was revealed that N123 was no longer a core participant and did not have legal representation. Mitting was concerned that if he did not give full anonymity to HN123 the officer would not cooperate with the Inquiry and it would not get a chance to hear their evidence, of importance given the potential connection to the spying on the Lawrences.[8] Mitting issuing his ruling on 5 December 2017, restricting publication of both real and cover names,. In this he acknowledged there was contention over the extent of HN123's role in spying on the Lawrences, but saying:[11]

On the factual premise that HN123's deployment only affected the Stephen Lawrence campaign peripherally and indirectly, it is not necessary for the fulfillment of the terms of reference of the Inquiry that his real or cover name should be published. If that premise proves to be wrong, I will have to revisit the issue.

The Restriction Order was made on 8 December 2017.

March 2016 application: open application, draft order, personal statement (gisted) & risk assessment (gisted).

August 2017 documents: open application for restriction order (MPS), open application for restriction order (S&G)


The Ellison review stated (p.211): N123... spoke on the telephone to Operation Herne in November 2013: "Francis was lying about the smearing of Lawrence…" N123 had taken over from Mr Francis when in the back office. Mr Francis had told him that it was their role to provide "gossip for the field…" N123 had spent nine months in the back office and amongst management and had gone to field meetings. Not once did N123 see or hear any instruction to 'smear' the Lawrences. He did not see any paperwork to reflect this either.

According to Bob Lambert (Ellison, p.214), N123 started his undercover work after Lambert had become head of the SDS and stated: I am sure from day one the Stephen Lawrence case would have been on N123’s agenda, and… they must have attended, started to attend meetings with the Stephen Lawrence campaign, almost goes as read that they would have been there… they would want to be inside the meeting, to have a speaker on the platform and so N123 is following close behind ‘Pete Francis’… they became quite close friends and times would have been at the same events… May well have been events specifically in support of the Stephen Lawrence campaign…

Mentioned in Herne II as being undercover with the potential to report on the Lawrence family (Herne II, 12.2).[12]


Represented by Slater & Gordon.

N127 unknown Minded To (Nov 2017): refuse application for restriction of real name.[13] Sergeant with SDS 1997-2001. Provides statement where he states he does not recognise Peter Francis's statements regarding spying on the Lawrence family; also received Lambert's memo on the N81 / Walton meeting (Ellison, p.229). N81 told Ellison: …I was informed, at the height of the Macpherson inquiry, that my reporting was going straight to Sir Paul Condon’s desk each morning via N24, and N127 (SDS Sgt) passed on to me from N24 congratulations from the Commissioner for your excellent reporting…' (Ellison 212, 229 & 232).[2]

Note from Mitting (Nov 2017):[13]

Between 1997 and 2001 HN127 was a cover officer for deployed undercover officers, some of whose activities are likely to be the subject of detailed investigation by the Inquiry. With one significant proviso, addressed below, public investigation of HN127’s performance of his duties in his real name can be undertaken without posing a risk to HN127’s safety or interfering with the right to respect for private and family life of HN127. It is unavoidable, for reasons explained in the closed note which accompanies these reasons, that part of HN127’s evidence will be given in closed session.
N129 unknown Extension sought to be dealt with in a future tranche.[9] SDS Detective Sergeant. received Lambert's memo on the N81 / Walton meeting; commented on character and skill of Peter Francis, but also that they did not recognise the allegations regarding seeking information to smear the Lawrence family. His statement to Op. Herne is quoted in Ellison (p.212): "[Mr Francis] was targeted towards the campaign in the same way as today… to perform a dual role of protecting the family from malicious extremist influences and providing information about potential public order issues. The anti-police sentiment on the streets was palpable, and Territorial Policing was very interested in any potential or planned disorder…" N129 believes that he was directly tasked to get involved with the campaign, although not necessarily with the family. His role was not about ‘smearing’ at all.[2]
HN146 unknown Real name to be published in due course.[1] No application made.[3] SDS back office / manager
N183 Richard Walton Special Branch background. Later head of Counter Terrorism Command.
N190 unknown SDS Detective Inspector; commented on retention / destruction of documents within the SDS during a 2004 document rationalisation process (Ellison, 201).[2]
HN204 unknown Real name to be published in due course.[1] No application made.[3] SDS back office / manager
N216 unknown Minded-to (Nov 2017): application for restriction order in respect of real name to be refused.[13] SDS management. Responsible for day-to-day running of the unit in the 1990s.

Note from Mitting (Nov 2017):[13]

The evidence which he can give about the management of the Special Demonstration Squad is potentially significant. There is no known allegation of misconduct against him. He has identified no plausible risk to the safety or welfare of himself or his family beyond the possibility of unwelcome media attention if his whereabouts were to be traced. This is a real risk, but it is outweighed by the legitimate interest which the public has in his performance of his duty in a senior and responsible public office. The starting presumption that evidence given by such a person about such duties should be given publicly and in his own name is not displaced. Closed reasons accompany the note.

Expressed outrage at Peter Francis allegations (Herne II, 21.1.14) and stated in respect of the targeting of Duwayne Brooks (Herne 24.1.13): 'SDS activity targeting individuals in a public order context may have brought certain officers into contact with, or in the close proximity of Duwayne Brooks, but, if that did happen, this would not have been in response to the murder investigation, or any connection with the family'.[12]

N218 unknown Cover name and real name to be published as no restriction order application made.[9] Herne II, para. 25.1.2 states: The MPS Director of Intelligence in 1999 has been interviewed by Operation Herne and stated, 'I have been asked if I recall 'any Special Branch plans to mislead the Macpherson Inquiry' into the death of Stephen Lawrence. For part of this time, I was head of Special Branch operations and have no recollection of any such plans.’ Peter Francis alleged that N218 came out to see him in respect of withholding information from the Macpherson Inquiry. In interview, N218 stated that this meeting or request never happened.[12] It is not clear if N218 is the MPS Director of Intelligence referred to or if it refers to someone else entirely. If N218 is the Director of Intelligence then it is probably Alan Fry as opposed to his successor Roger Pearce (who appears as N85).[12]
HN241 unknown Minded-to (Nov 2017): neither cover or real name can be published.[13] SDS UCO. In his 70s, deployed against one group in the early 1970s. No allegation of misconduct.

Mitting stated (Nov 2017):[13]

Although the risk to physical safety, if the real name were to be published, is low, it cannot be dismissed as fanciful. There is a real, but unquantifiable, risk that if the cover name were to be published, the real name could be identified. From what has so far been disclosed to the Inquiry about the deployment, it seems very unlikely that the publication of either real or cover name would prompt any evidence from a non—state source which would assist the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. In those circumstances, the right to respect for an aspect of private life – physical integrity – is not outweighed by any factor which would justify interference with it. Closed reasons accompany this note
HN244 unknown Full extent of restriction order being sought unknown; extension sought for MPS to supply this application (Nov 2017).[9]
N275 unknown Det. Ch. Insp.; probably SDS but not definitive. Critical of record retention and note-taking in the SDS (Ellison, pages 198 & 201).[2]
HN294 unknown Ruling (December 2017): real name cannot be published.[11] Cover name not ascertained by UCPI.[1] SDS UCO & managerial. Now deceased. Deployed in 1968-1969 against one group which no longer exists, and reported on others, which also no longer exist. Managerial position in SDS 1969-1974, though the nature of this is not established. Has elderly widow & other family members.[11][3]

An application was made by the MPS to restricting real name, submitted along with evidence from family and a risk assessment - of which open versions were published in August 2017.[4]

In his 'Minded-to' (Aug 2017), Mitting said that he was intended to restrict the real name, noting:[3]

There is no risk to their safety and minimal risk of intrusive interest in them even if his real name were to be published. They wish to avoid that risk. Although the risk is minimal, nothing would be gained by running it. Unless HN294’s cover name were to become known, publication of his real name could not prompt evidence from one or more members of the affected groups. Evidence about his managerial role, if it is available, can be given by others who knew him, by reference to his cypher. In those circumstances, interference with the right of his widow and family to respect for their private life under Article 8 of the European Convention would not be justifiable under Article 8(2).

August 2017 application: Open application for restriction order, open risk assessment (Brian Lockie), open personal statement (1), open personal statement (2)

The application was heard at the hearing of 21 November 2017,[8] with Mitting ruling in favour of restricting the real name on 5 December. The grounds for the ruling were intereference with the rights of the widow (a family member had written on her behalf) despite their being 'no risk to the safety of his widow and family and minimal risk of intrusive media interest in them if his real name were to be published)'. He also said the submission that the chance the public being able to provide details of HN294's time undercover if they had his real name was 'fanciful', so the real name was not needed to fulfil the Inquiry's terms of reference.[11] The Restriction Order was issued on 8 December 2017.

HN297 Rick Gibson (alias) Cover name released[1] Minded-To: real name cannot be published.[3] SDS UCO. Deceased. Deployed 1974-1976. "As in the case of the living officers cited above it is unlikely that the publication of his real name would prompt the giving or production of evidence necessary to permit the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. It would be likely to interfere with the right of his widow."[3] The MPS have submitted an application to restrict his real name, along with a risk assessment (Graham Walker) and additional threat assessments - open versions published along with cover name.[4]

The application was heard at the hearing of 21 November 2017, where it was brought to the Inquiry's attention there was credible information that HN297 had conducted several relationships while undercover. Mitting noted this changed things, and asked for further information from the non-police/state core participants before making his ruling.[8][11] An application for core participancy by Richard Chessum, whom Gibson had spied upon and was able to provide information on said relationships, was accepted by Mitting on 5 December 2017.[14]

HN298 unknown Minded-to (Nov 2017): Real name cannot be published.[13] SDS UCO. Deployed against two groups in the 1970s, one of which was involved in anti-apartheid campaigning:[13]
In the course of his deployment, he was arrested at a demonstration against the British Lions rugby tour to South Africa on 12 May 1972 for obstruction of the highway and of a police officer. He was prosecuted in summary proceedings in his cover name. He was convicted of both offenses and fined and made the subject of a conditional discharge. His actions were approved by his line management. Not long after his deployment, he left the police service, since when he has had nothing to do with the police.

No application made for his cover name to be restricted. Regarding his application to have his real name restricted, Mitting noted:[13]

It is possible that, if his cover name is published, members of the groups against whom he was deployed will remember him and be able to give evidence about him. For that to happen, it is not necessary that his real name should be published. He has politely declined to cooperate with the Metropolitan Police risk assessor. In consequence, the Inquiry does not know whether he wishes to protect his real name. If he were to do so, and no new information adverse to him were to emerge, the interference with right to respect for his private life under Article 8(2) of the European Convention which would be occasioned by publication of his real name would not be justified. For the time being, on the application of the Metropolitan Police Service, his real name should not be published. This decision will be reviewed when he has made his own position clear.

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 Press Release: 'Minded to' note, ruling and directions in respect of anonymity applications relating to former officers of the Special Demonstration Squad, Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 3 August 2017 (accessed 3 August 2017).
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Mark Ellison, Possible corruption and the role of undercover policing in the Stephen Lawrence case, Stephen Lawrence Independent Review, Vol. 1, Gov.UK, March 2014
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 John Mitting, In the matter of section 19(3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations Squad ‘Minded to’ note, Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 David Barr & Kate Wilkinson, Counsel to the Inquiry's explanatory note to accompany the 'Minded to' note in respect of applications for restrictions over the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstration Squad, Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).
  5. Ruth Brander & Philippa Kaufmann QC, Submissions on behalf of the non-police, non-state core participants re the Chairman's 'Minded To' note dated 3 August 2017 concerning restriction order applications, 5 October 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).
  6. 6.0 6.1 Sir John Mitting, Supplementary 'Minded-To', Undercover Policing Inquiry, 23 October 2017 (accessed 23 October 2017 via UCPI.org.uk).
  7. Ruth Brander & Philippa Kaufmann QC, Submissions on behalf of the non-police, non-state core participants re the Chairman's 'Minded To' note dated 23 October 2017 concerning restriction order applications, 6 November 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 Transcript of hearing of 21 November 2017, Undercover Policing Inquiry, 21 November 2017.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Counsel to the Inquiry's Explanatory note to accompany the 'Minded-To' Note (2) in respect for restrictions over the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstration Squad, Undercover Policing Inquiry, 14 November 2017 (accessed 15 November 2017).
  10. Update on anonymity applications – N118 ("Simon Wellings"), Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 19 January 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 Sir John Mitting, Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstration Squad: Ruling, Undercover Policing Inquiry, 5 December 2017 (accessed 9 December 2017).
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Mick Creedon, Operation Herne: Report 2 - Allegations of Peter Francis, Metropolitan Police Service, March 2014.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 13.7 13.8 In the matter of section 19 (3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations Squad ‘Minded to’ note 2, Undercover Policing Inquiry, 14 November 2017 (accessed 15 November 2017)
  14. Sir John Mitting, Core Participants Ruling 15: Richard Chessum, Undercover Policing Inquiry, 4 December 2017.