Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tom Mills"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(you silly)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi,
 
 
I wonder about the rationale for the conference atendees selection?  If you look at Herman and o'Sullivan they have a list of terrorism institutes.: http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Category:The_%22Terrorism%22_Industry
 
 
They say that (in 1989) [[CSIS]] is one of the most influential terror think tanks.  Also [[Rand Corporation]] is clearly key.  do we have any way of assessing which are the most important organisations to include?  Perhaps we should add RAnd and CSIS and maybe a couple of others?  What do you think?
 
 
--[[User:David|David]] 11:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 
 
Ah I see.  I think if you can put all that info on the page that would give a much better sense of what you did and why some orgs are not there.  that makes the rationale much stronger.
 
 
Great!
 
--[[User:David|David]] 11:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 
 
got a book yesterday by this guy: http://www.uscanada.bham.ac.uk/staff/hewitt.htm
 
 
Is there any reason to include him in any list?
 
--[[User:David|David]] 12:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 
 
== faulty HTML ==
 
 
Hi Tom
 
 
You just entered a table using:
 
<nowiki><td align=“center”></nowiki>
 
 
DO NOT USE slanted quotation or apostrophy marks... use the simple >> " or ' << otherwise HTML section will be ignored.
 
 
--[[User:Paul|Paulo]] 14:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 
 
I am referring to the table found here:
 
Terrorexpertise:Experts from Major World Publications
 
 
== you silly ==
 
 
I didnt suggest that you transform <td align...> --> <td>
 
 
I urged you to use straight quotation marks " instead of &rdquo;  == the latter is wrong...
 
 
--[[User:Paul|Paulo]] 19:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 
 
 
Hi,
 
Hi,
  

Revision as of 09:05, 14 February 2008

Hi,

Terrorexpertise:Experts from Major World Publications this page appears to have the wrong content: on conferences and not publications? --David 08:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Have a look. It contains the conference data and not the lexis search... --David 09:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

or maybe just the wrong title?

--David 09:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)