User talk:Idrees

did you mean...

In this section: MacShane and Muslims you state: "In the same article, he misrepresents the statement which had caused the outrage by publishing the altered version of the speech, which was changed as a result of the furore." Hmmm... did he republish the original?? If he altered it to due to pressure, I suspect that you mean that he reverted to the original... Paulo

IISS

you say:

To salvage its credibility, the IISS, unlike the British Government, claimed that it made mistakes in its dossier about the extent of the Iraqi threat, and commissioned an independent assessment by Rolf Ekeus, a former head of United Nations arms inspectors in Iraq.Samore and Chipman later claimed that their dossier had caveats about Iraq's supposed WMD arsenal, while the Government insisted on removing such caveats from intelligence assessments - leading to "sexing up" accusations.

But is what they say about the caveats true? If so, does this undermine the previous popint about their original report? Can you explain or include the evidence?

--David 09:05, 13 September 2007 (BST)

why removed?

Hi Why did you remove the table format of the component organizations of NED? It put forth the linkages better than what you did. NB: there were more groups that will be added to this. Paulo

but it conveys the relative importance

Hi But the table conveys the relative importance. You also axed the USAID link. Kind rgds Paulo

requirement

Hi The folks at SW require entries to have a bit of info about what has been added or changed... one usually enters this in the Summary line. It would be nice if Spin* folks would do the same... Paulo

ff off...

Hi Idrees You entered the footnote references to the LFOI with some silly format... since you entered this to begin with, could you make sure they match and make sense?? Kind rgds

Paulo