Difference between revisions of "User talk:Idrees"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(superfluous)
(Blanked the page)
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi,
 
  
can you use the footnote format for the Pacific legal foundation etc?
 
 
ie:
 
quote {{ref|refid}}
 
 
 
==Notes==
 
 
# {{note|refid}}
 
 
--[[User:David|David]] 21:18, 18 Jul 2006 (BST)
 
 
Any chance you can tidy up the Conservative Friends of israel page and add a sentence at the beginning?
 
 
--[[User:David|David]] 22:42, 28 Jul 2006 (BST)
 
 
Not sure what you mean about dead links and summarising?  No need to summarise the profiles at the moment .  I think just get them up fo just now and tidy up the other corprate wones
 
--[[User:David|David]] 09:24, 29 Jul 2006 (BST)
 
 
 
Hi, can you use the referencing format on the campus watch page?
 
 
--[[User:David|David]] 16:22, 9 Nov 2006 (GMT)
 
 
== superfluous ==
 
 
>>Unless there is something in the biography that is particularly revealing, reproducing extended biographies defeats the whole purpose of having a profile. The idea should be to provide condensed factual information that highlights possible conflicts of interests.<<
 
 
Hmmm: but there is so little info on Lappen, that the little officially recognized info is worth putting in Spin* -- especially since this type of info is volatile -- i.e., in a few weeks you will see that it is either changed or removed (very common)... as such, keeping the record of these things is valuable.
 
 
>>The bios on Lappen & Vallely are in my view mostly superfluous.<<
 
The Vallely one?  There virtually no info there -- and again the official record of the bio is useful... About Lappen... I eliminated a bit, but the experience at SW* with this bio indicated that the only things that remain are those that are sourced
 
 
 
>>
 
Secondly, on the Palast profile, I think you can summarize the nature of his attack on Gallowy without editorializing on Galloways stance on the war<<
 
Well, on the one hand you want me to summarize things, and on the other you call my summaries "editorializing".  Make up your mind.
 
 
'''And''':  FEEL FREE TO EDIT THE ARTICLES YOURSELF IF YOU THINK YOU CAN IMPROVE THEM.  I would not be offended if you did that.
 

Latest revision as of 22:21, 23 April 2011