Difference between revisions of "Talk:John Kampfner"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
m (article needs a major rewrite)
Line 1: Line 1:
I'll finish this off today should anyone seek to rewrite it
+
The article needs to be rewritten in toto... it is basically a poorly written jab at Kampfner... not all well documented.  Even the first few paragraph lack cohesion or logic...
  
what's the point in me writing this if its going to be editted while I'm writing it and i loose stuff its taken me a while to write?
+
I hope that is OK to do a major reshuffle and axing of silly material.
  
i don't see the point in carrying on with it ±— fuck it
+
[[User:Paul|Paulo]]

Revision as of 14:02, 2 September 2007

The article needs to be rewritten in toto... it is basically a poorly written jab at Kampfner... not all well documented. Even the first few paragraph lack cohesion or logic...

I hope that is OK to do a major reshuffle and axing of silly material.

Paulo