Difference between revisions of "Peterhouse"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(The Peterhouse Right)
(The Peterhouse Right)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
[[Kenneth Minogue]] wrote of [[Maurice Cowling|Cowling]] on the [[Social Affairs Unit]] blog that: ‘His main target was a kind of pious high mindedness that he detected lurking behind the dominant liberalism of political life and the deceptive pretence of impartiality in a lot of academic writing.’ <ref>Kenneth Minogue, ‘[http://www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/000582.php The LSE Right on the Peterhouse Right: Kenneth Minogue on Maurice Cowling, the Conservative as Social Critic]’, Social Affairs Unit, 19 September 2005</ref> [[Maurice Cowling|Cowling]] himself described the ‘Peterhouse Right’ as ‘a small group of dons whose teaching and writing is about the history of politics, art thought and religion’ and who ‘share common prejudices - against the higher liberalism and all sorts of liberal rhetoric, including ecclesiastical liberal rhetoric’. <ref>quoted in Geoffrey Wheatcroft, ‘Inside Story: On the eve of the Conservative Party's latest budget, Geoffrey Wheatcroft re-ports on how Cambridge's smallest and oldest college has become the breeding ground of the radical Right’, ''Guardian'', 26 November 1993; p.8</ref>
 
[[Kenneth Minogue]] wrote of [[Maurice Cowling|Cowling]] on the [[Social Affairs Unit]] blog that: ‘His main target was a kind of pious high mindedness that he detected lurking behind the dominant liberalism of political life and the deceptive pretence of impartiality in a lot of academic writing.’ <ref>Kenneth Minogue, ‘[http://www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/000582.php The LSE Right on the Peterhouse Right: Kenneth Minogue on Maurice Cowling, the Conservative as Social Critic]’, Social Affairs Unit, 19 September 2005</ref> [[Maurice Cowling|Cowling]] himself described the ‘Peterhouse Right’ as ‘a small group of dons whose teaching and writing is about the history of politics, art thought and religion’ and who ‘share common prejudices - against the higher liberalism and all sorts of liberal rhetoric, including ecclesiastical liberal rhetoric’. <ref>quoted in Geoffrey Wheatcroft, ‘Inside Story: On the eve of the Conservative Party's latest budget, Geoffrey Wheatcroft re-ports on how Cambridge's smallest and oldest college has become the breeding ground of the radical Right’, ''Guardian'', 26 November 1993; p.8</ref>
  
In the 1960s [[Maurice Cowling|Cowling]] campaigned against plans within the university to introduce a course in sociology, which he regarded as a vehicle for liberal dogma. <ref>‘Cambridge historian who influenced a generation of Conservative politicians and was a scourge of the liberal intelligentsia’, The Times, 26 August 2005</ref>  This reflected his highly cynical view of intellectual debate which he believed simply reflected the interests of participants.  [[William Rees-Mogg]], who visited [[Maurice Cowling|Cowling]] at Peterhouse in the late 1970s, writes that, ‘His central doctrine was that political philosophies are mere rhetoric, designed to advance the politician or his party towards power. He was a brilliant exponent of political philosophies, but he did not believe that they were real.’ <ref>William Rees-Mogg, [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/william_rees_mogg/article560100.ece Ideas are the decisive force], The Times, 29, August 2005.</ref>  Similarly [[Kenneth Minogue]] writes that [[Maurice Cowling|Cowling]] ‘followed, to a fault, the cynical or Marxist line that utterances about the world are all "performatives" designed to play a persuasive role in argument… He was not averse to describing himself as a “Tory Marxist”.’ <ref>Kenneth Minogue, ‘[http://www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/000582.php The LSE Right on the Peterhouse Right: Kenneth Minogue on Maurice Cowling, the Conservative as Social Critic]’, Social Affairs Unit, 19 September 2005</ref>
+
In the 1960s [[Maurice Cowling|Cowling]] campaigned against plans within the university to introduce a course in sociology, which he regarded as a vehicle for liberal dogma. <ref>‘Cambridge historian who influenced a generation of Conservative politicians and was a scourge of the liberal intelligentsia’, The Times, 26 August 2005</ref>  This reflected his highly cynical view of intellectual debate which he believed simply reflected the interests of participants.  [[William Rees-Mogg]], who visited [[Maurice Cowling|Cowling]] at Peterhouse in the late 1970s, writes that, ‘His central doctrine was that political philosophies are mere rhetoric, designed to advance the politician or his party towards power. He was a brilliant exponent of political philosophies, but he did not believe that they were real.’ <ref>William Rees-Mogg, [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/william_rees_mogg/article560100.ece Ideas are the decisive force], The Times, 29, August 2005.</ref>  Similarly [[Kenneth Minogue]] writes that [[Maurice Cowling|Cowling]] ‘followed, to a fault, the cynical or Marxist line that utterances about the world are all "performatives" designed to play a persuasive role in argument… He was not averse to describing himself as a “Tory Marxist”.’ <ref>Kenneth Minogue, ‘[http://www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/000582.php The LSE Right on the Peterhouse Right: Kenneth Minogue on Maurice Cowling, the Conservative as Social Critic]’, Social Affairs Unit, 19 September 2005</ref> According to Jonathan Parry, Cowling 'prescribed an extraordinary variety of books [to his students], including much Marxist and post-modernist criticism.' <ref>Jonathan Parry, ‘[http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/95252 Cowling, Maurice John (1926–2005)]’, ''Oxford Dictionary of National Biography'', Oxford University Press, Jan 2009; online edn, May 2009 [Accessed 15 Oct 2010]</ref>
  
According to his ''Times'' obituary, Cowling influenced [[Michael Portillo]], [[Alistair Cooke]], for many years a linchpin of the Conservative research department; [[Hywel Williams]], an adviser to [[John Redwood]]; and [[David Ruffley]], MP, an adviser to [[Kenneth Clarke]]. Others taught by him or influenced by his personality were [[Oliver Letwin]], [[Charles Moore]], [[Norman Stone]], [[Niall Ferguson]], [[Frank Johnson]] and [[Andrew Roberts]]. <ref>‘Cambridge historian who influenced a generation of Conservative politicians and was a scourge of the liberal intelligentsia’, ''The Times'', 26 August 2005</ref>
+
Peter Oborne describes Cowling as an inspirational teacher of the Namierite school of history:
 +
 
 +
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">[H]is particular scholarly contribution was to take Namier's pessimism about human nature, scepticism about political ideas, and dogmatic insistence that public events could only be explained by reference to narrow personal interest, to their ultimate conclusion. His most important book, ''The Impact of Hitler'', argued in spellbinding detail that the British reaction to the rise of fascism in the 1930s could only be understood in terms of squalid calculations of partisan advantage.<ref>Peter Oborne, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/19/politicians-media-spin The Tories must avoid the cult of the celebrity prime minister], ''Observer'', 19 April 2009.</ref></blockquote>
 +
 
 +
Oborne cites disgraced Labour spindoctor [[Damian McBride]], who studied under Cowling at Peterhouse, as an example of the historian's political influence along with [[Michael Gove]] and the Labour spin doctor [[Michael Ellam]]. <ref>Peter Oborne, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/19/politicians-media-spin The Tories must avoid the cult of the celebrity prime minister], The Observer, 19 April 2009.</ref> According to his ''Times'' obituary, Cowling influenced [[Michael Portillo]], [[Alistair Cooke]], for many years a linchpin of the Conservative research department; [[Hywel Williams]], an adviser to [[John Redwood]]; and [[David Ruffley]], MP, an adviser to [[Kenneth Clarke]]. Others taught by him or influenced by his personality were [[Oliver Letwin]], [[Charles Moore]], [[Norman Stone]], [[Niall Ferguson]], [[Frank Johnson]] and [[Andrew Roberts]]. <ref>‘Cambridge historian who influenced a generation of Conservative politicians and was a scourge of the liberal intelligentsia’, ''The Times'', 26 August 2005</ref>
  
 
==Notable Peterhouse alumni==
 
==Notable Peterhouse alumni==

Revision as of 12:16, 15 October 2010

Peterhouse is a college at Cambridge University with a tradition of right-wing, reactionary thought. It became associated with the New Right in the 1980s and more recently has become a hub of neoconservative thinking, most notably by serving as a launch pad for the Henry Jackson Society. Peterhouse was also where Phillip Blond, the architect of 'Red Toryism', studied his theology PhD.[1]

The Peterhouse Right

In the 1970s and ‘80s Peterhouse was a base for a group of reactionary intellectuals known as the ‘Peterhouse Right’ or ‘Cambridge Right’. Tim Williams, a newspaper columnist who read history at Peterhouse, writes that: ‘The 1970s Peterhouse fogeys combined a desire to turn the clock back… with a revolutionary desire to replace traditional conservatism with a more muscular, aggressive version which would not accept the 1945 settlement but would destroy it, root and branch. These were to be the cultural shock troops of Thatcherism.’ [2] Thee 'shocktroops' were led by the conservative historian Maurice Cowling who was a Fellow of Peterhouse from 1963 to 1993. In an article on the ‘Peterhouse Right’ published in the Guardian in 1993, Geoffrey Wheatcroft wrote:

Cowling came to the college in 1963 after a spot of journalism on The Times and Daily Express and an attempt to get into Parliament.

In 1971, he was joined by Dr Edward Norman, another clerical don and gadfly of the liberal ecclesiastical establishment, and soon after by David Watkin, a prolific conservative writer on architecture.

It was in the early 1970s - when Michael Portillo was an undergraduate - that Peterhouse briefly established a London base, at the Spectator. The magazine was edited for a time by George Gale; Maurice Cowling was his literary editor, and another Petrean, Patrick Cosgrave, was political columnist. Cosgrave had passed through the college on his way from Dublin to London.

He had a season of fame as the one journalist whole-heartedly to back Margaret Thatcher in her bid for the Tory leadership in 1975, and then a short season of favour at her court. Other kindred spirits at Peterhouse in the 1970s included Roger Scruton from the Hegelian Right and John Vincent. [3]

In his biography of Michael Portillo Michael Gove wrote:

Peterhouse was the oldest, smallest and most reactionary of Cambridge's colleges. Portillo's tutor, Maurice Cowling, was spare, crusty and the university's most reactionary don. Cowling and his fellow Right-winger Shirley Robin Letwin [mother of Oliver Letwin], the author of The Anatomy Of Thatcherism, introduced their students to a type of Conservatism at odds with the progressive drift of Edward Heath's government.

Cowling's Conservatism was broadly a belief in letting those born to rule get on with it, rather than succumbing to modish liberalism. He argued that, in politics, 'elites... should eschew guilt and self-doubt to perform the duties of their stations' and that politics itself was 'primarily a matter of rhetoric and manoeuvre' among the small group of leaders whose 'accepted authority constituted political leadership'. [4]

Kenneth Minogue wrote of Cowling on the Social Affairs Unit blog that: ‘His main target was a kind of pious high mindedness that he detected lurking behind the dominant liberalism of political life and the deceptive pretence of impartiality in a lot of academic writing.’ [5] Cowling himself described the ‘Peterhouse Right’ as ‘a small group of dons whose teaching and writing is about the history of politics, art thought and religion’ and who ‘share common prejudices - against the higher liberalism and all sorts of liberal rhetoric, including ecclesiastical liberal rhetoric’. [6]

In the 1960s Cowling campaigned against plans within the university to introduce a course in sociology, which he regarded as a vehicle for liberal dogma. [7] This reflected his highly cynical view of intellectual debate which he believed simply reflected the interests of participants. William Rees-Mogg, who visited Cowling at Peterhouse in the late 1970s, writes that, ‘His central doctrine was that political philosophies are mere rhetoric, designed to advance the politician or his party towards power. He was a brilliant exponent of political philosophies, but he did not believe that they were real.’ [8] Similarly Kenneth Minogue writes that Cowling ‘followed, to a fault, the cynical or Marxist line that utterances about the world are all "performatives" designed to play a persuasive role in argument… He was not averse to describing himself as a “Tory Marxist”.’ [9] According to Jonathan Parry, Cowling 'prescribed an extraordinary variety of books [to his students], including much Marxist and post-modernist criticism.' [10]

Peter Oborne describes Cowling as an inspirational teacher of the Namierite school of history:

[H]is particular scholarly contribution was to take Namier's pessimism about human nature, scepticism about political ideas, and dogmatic insistence that public events could only be explained by reference to narrow personal interest, to their ultimate conclusion. His most important book, The Impact of Hitler, argued in spellbinding detail that the British reaction to the rise of fascism in the 1930s could only be understood in terms of squalid calculations of partisan advantage.[11]

Oborne cites disgraced Labour spindoctor Damian McBride, who studied under Cowling at Peterhouse, as an example of the historian's political influence along with Michael Gove and the Labour spin doctor Michael Ellam. [12] According to his Times obituary, Cowling influenced Michael Portillo, Alistair Cooke, for many years a linchpin of the Conservative research department; Hywel Williams, an adviser to John Redwood; and David Ruffley, MP, an adviser to Kenneth Clarke. Others taught by him or influenced by his personality were Oliver Letwin, Charles Moore, Norman Stone, Niall Ferguson, Frank Johnson and Andrew Roberts. [13]

Notable Peterhouse alumni

Guy Black | Phillip Blond | Michael Ellam | Niall Ferguson | Daniel Johnson | Damian McBride | John Milbank | John Redwood

Notes

  1. John Harris, 'Phillip Blond: The man who wrote Cameron's mood music, Guardian, 8 August 2009
  2. Tim Williams, ‘News no surprise to former colleagues at Cambridge College’, Scotsman, 10 September 1999; p.10
  3. Geoffrey Wheatcroft, ‘Inside Story: On the eve of the Conservative Party's latest budget, Geoffrey Wheatcroft re-ports on how Cambridge's smallest and oldest college has become the breeding ground of the radical Right’, Guardian, 26 November 1993; p.8
  4. Extract from Michael Portillo, The Future Of The Right by Michael Gove, published in Daily Mail, 10 October 1995; p.9
  5. Kenneth Minogue, ‘The LSE Right on the Peterhouse Right: Kenneth Minogue on Maurice Cowling, the Conservative as Social Critic’, Social Affairs Unit, 19 September 2005
  6. quoted in Geoffrey Wheatcroft, ‘Inside Story: On the eve of the Conservative Party's latest budget, Geoffrey Wheatcroft re-ports on how Cambridge's smallest and oldest college has become the breeding ground of the radical Right’, Guardian, 26 November 1993; p.8
  7. ‘Cambridge historian who influenced a generation of Conservative politicians and was a scourge of the liberal intelligentsia’, The Times, 26 August 2005
  8. William Rees-Mogg, Ideas are the decisive force, The Times, 29, August 2005.
  9. Kenneth Minogue, ‘The LSE Right on the Peterhouse Right: Kenneth Minogue on Maurice Cowling, the Conservative as Social Critic’, Social Affairs Unit, 19 September 2005
  10. Jonathan Parry, ‘Cowling, Maurice John (1926–2005)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, Jan 2009; online edn, May 2009 [Accessed 15 Oct 2010]
  11. Peter Oborne, The Tories must avoid the cult of the celebrity prime minister, Observer, 19 April 2009.
  12. Peter Oborne, The Tories must avoid the cult of the celebrity prime minister, The Observer, 19 April 2009.
  13. ‘Cambridge historian who influenced a generation of Conservative politicians and was a scourge of the liberal intelligentsia’, The Times, 26 August 2005