Difference between revisions of "Max Boot"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
m (code fix)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
See Rightweb [http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1042.html Max Boot]
 +
 +
=='America should be the world’s policeman'==
 +
In 2008 Boot attended a debate sponsored by [[Robert Rosenkranz]], arguing (with [[Michael Mandelbaum]] and [[Douglas Murray]]) for the motion 'America should be the world’s policeman'. The conservative English journalist Matthew Parris, who argued against the notion commented:
 +
 +
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">Both Murray and Boot and Michael Mandelbaum, too clever for the mob on their own side, represent one of the most interesting political experiments in outsourcing ever conducted -- U.S. conservatism’s franchising out to experts of its higher mental faculties. Their function, they’re a kind of priesthood, is to flatter stupider people that there exist higher arguments, smarter than they themselves can quite grasp, for things that they wanted to do anyway.  They should be here in white robes. <ref>Intelligence Square, [http://www.powerbase.info/images/4/4f/AmericaWorldPoliceman-021208.pdf Transcript of 'America should be the world’s policeman']</ref></blockquote>
 +
 
==Affiliations==
 
==Affiliations==
*[[Weekly Standard]] - Contributing editor
+
''[[Weekly Standard]]'' - Contributing editor
 +
==Notes==
 +
<references/>
 +
[[category:neocons|Boot, Max]]

Latest revision as of 07:56, 3 February 2016

See Rightweb Max Boot

'America should be the world’s policeman'

In 2008 Boot attended a debate sponsored by Robert Rosenkranz, arguing (with Michael Mandelbaum and Douglas Murray) for the motion 'America should be the world’s policeman'. The conservative English journalist Matthew Parris, who argued against the notion commented:

Both Murray and Boot and Michael Mandelbaum, too clever for the mob on their own side, represent one of the most interesting political experiments in outsourcing ever conducted -- U.S. conservatism’s franchising out to experts of its higher mental faculties. Their function, they’re a kind of priesthood, is to flatter stupider people that there exist higher arguments, smarter than they themselves can quite grasp, for things that they wanted to do anyway. They should be here in white robes. [1]

Affiliations

Weekly Standard - Contributing editor

Notes