Difference between revisions of "Justin Shaw"
Tom Griffin (talk | contribs) (added a page) |
Tom Griffin (talk | contribs) (added references) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:: Last night it was becoming clear that a caucus of fervent Loyalists under the umbrella of a Unionist study group is closely associated with the leaker. It is made up of PR man [[David Burnside]], D'Ancona himself; [[Dean Godson]], a Daily Telegraph staff reporter; [[Paul Goodman]], Northern Ireland correspondent on the Sunday Telegraph; [[Noel Malcolm]], a historian and Daily Telegraph political columnist; [[Andrew McHallam]], executive director of the [[Institute for European Defence and Strategic Studies]]; [[Charles Moore]], editor of the Sunday Telegraph; [[Simon Pearce]], a Conservative election candidate; company director [[Justin Shaw]] and historian [[Andrew Roberts]]. One of the group said last night: 'We didn't want the position when the framework document was published of being out in the cold as we were over the Anglo-Irish Agreement in 1985. There was a coming together of minds over what should be done.'<ref>Mail on Sunday (London)February 5, 1995, Top-level conspirator who'll never be found HISTORIAN: Roberts DIRECTOR: McHallam CONSERVATIVE: Pearce; HOW ULSTER LEAK PLOTTERS BEAT SECURITY TO PROTECT SECRET SOURCE OF LEAK, BYLINE: Adrian Lithgow, SECTION: Pg. 6 | :: Last night it was becoming clear that a caucus of fervent Loyalists under the umbrella of a Unionist study group is closely associated with the leaker. It is made up of PR man [[David Burnside]], D'Ancona himself; [[Dean Godson]], a Daily Telegraph staff reporter; [[Paul Goodman]], Northern Ireland correspondent on the Sunday Telegraph; [[Noel Malcolm]], a historian and Daily Telegraph political columnist; [[Andrew McHallam]], executive director of the [[Institute for European Defence and Strategic Studies]]; [[Charles Moore]], editor of the Sunday Telegraph; [[Simon Pearce]], a Conservative election candidate; company director [[Justin Shaw]] and historian [[Andrew Roberts]]. One of the group said last night: 'We didn't want the position when the framework document was published of being out in the cold as we were over the Anglo-Irish Agreement in 1985. There was a coming together of minds over what should be done.'<ref>Mail on Sunday (London)February 5, 1995, Top-level conspirator who'll never be found HISTORIAN: Roberts DIRECTOR: McHallam CONSERVATIVE: Pearce; HOW ULSTER LEAK PLOTTERS BEAT SECURITY TO PROTECT SECRET SOURCE OF LEAK, BYLINE: Adrian Lithgow, SECTION: Pg. 6 | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==notes== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 02:18, 20 December 2007
Chairman of Civitas
Shaw has been linked to a group of right-wing unionists responsible for the leaking of a draft Framework Document in the early stages of the Irish peace process.
- Last night it was becoming clear that a caucus of fervent Loyalists under the umbrella of a Unionist study group is closely associated with the leaker. It is made up of PR man David Burnside, D'Ancona himself; Dean Godson, a Daily Telegraph staff reporter; Paul Goodman, Northern Ireland correspondent on the Sunday Telegraph; Noel Malcolm, a historian and Daily Telegraph political columnist; Andrew McHallam, executive director of the Institute for European Defence and Strategic Studies; Charles Moore, editor of the Sunday Telegraph; Simon Pearce, a Conservative election candidate; company director Justin Shaw and historian Andrew Roberts. One of the group said last night: 'We didn't want the position when the framework document was published of being out in the cold as we were over the Anglo-Irish Agreement in 1985. There was a coming together of minds over what should be done.'[1]
notes
- ↑ Mail on Sunday (London)February 5, 1995, Top-level conspirator who'll never be found HISTORIAN: Roberts DIRECTOR: McHallam CONSERVATIVE: Pearce; HOW ULSTER LEAK PLOTTERS BEAT SECURITY TO PROTECT SECRET SOURCE OF LEAK, BYLINE: Adrian Lithgow, SECTION: Pg. 6
