Difference between revisions of "Front groups"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Characteristics of Front Groups)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
* Is constantly trying to reinforce that it is 'independent', 'credible', 'trustworthy', 'esteemed', etc.
 
* Is constantly trying to reinforce that it is 'independent', 'credible', 'trustworthy', 'esteemed', etc.
 
* Has very low, or free membership fees to bolster membership numbers and claim legitimacy<ref name="SourceWatch"/>
 
* Has very low, or free membership fees to bolster membership numbers and claim legitimacy<ref name="SourceWatch"/>
 +
  
 
==Examples of United Kingdom Front Groups==
 
==Examples of United Kingdom Front Groups==

Revision as of 22:52, 21 March 2015

Microphones-2-.jpg This article is part of the Propaganda Portal project of Spinwatch.

Front Groups are organisations that claim to represent one agenda, but in reality they represent the interests of another concealed agenda. What separates Front Groups from other lobbying organisations is that Front Groups attempt to conceal their true agenda, which is not the case for all lobby groups. The clandestine way that Front Groups operate means that it is difficult to determine their true intentions. The creation of Front Groups is a key example of Third Party Technique in the Public Relations industry[1].

Corporate Front Groups tend to focus their efforts on public relations and lobbying initiatives, operating under the premise that a narrative is more palatable when it originates from an apparently independent source. Front Groups seek to dupe policy makers, journalists, and citizens into believing that the reports they commission and the narratives they spin are anything other than simple corporate Propaganda. These Front Groups are often very politically active; holding news conferences, publishing newsletters, commissioning reports, writing editorials, and featuring on talk shows in an effort to divert public opinion toward industry views[2].


Characteristics of Front Groups

A Front Group may exhibit some of the following characteristics:

  • Avoids mentioning or selectively publishes its main sources of funding
  • Was set up by another organisation (particularly PR, consultancy, grassroots campaigning, surveying firms)
  • Engages in actions that consistently and conspicuously benefit regular third parties
  • Re-focuses controversial debates onto new and often unrelated topics
  • Has a misleading name that disguises the organisation's real agenda
  • Has the the same address or phone number that has been or is currently listed to other corporations
  • Consists of outspoken industry 'experts'
  • Is constantly trying to reinforce that it is 'independent', 'credible', 'trustworthy', 'esteemed', etc.
  • Has very low, or free membership fees to bolster membership numbers and claim legitimacy[1]


Examples of United Kingdom Front Groups


Examples of United States Front Groups


Resources

  • SourceWatch, Front Groups: Good overview of Corporate Front Groups, history and examples
  • Wikipedia, Front Organization: Overview of Front Groups from a variety of different sectors
  • Mark Megalli and Andy Friedman (March 1992), Fronting for Business: Article discussing Corporate Front Groups in 20th Century America

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 SourceWatch, Front Groups, SourceWatch website, accessed 20 March 2015
  2. Mark Megalli and Andy Friedman (March 1992), Fronting For Business, Multinational Monitor website, accessed 20 March 2015