User talk:Kerri Park - Revision history

David: /* Buscombe */ new section

2009-04-10T06:41:03Z

Buscombe: new section

Claire Robinson: /* portal */ new section

2009-03-26T11:37:40Z

portal: new section

Claire Robinson: yr message, and request

2009-03-01T18:12:37Z

yr message, and request

Kerri Park: FOI uploads

2009-03-01T17:28:56Z

FOI uploads

David: foi's

2009-03-01T15:48:00Z

foi's

Kerri Park: i worked it out!

2009-02-26T15:33:05Z

i worked it out!

Kerri Park: children's plan

2009-02-26T15:31:00Z

children's plan

Kerri Park: amendments

2009-02-12T11:36:35Z

amendments

Claire Robinson: Dates of sources

2009-02-11T18:34:27Z

Dates of sources

David: another thing

2009-02-11T13:13:08Z

another thing

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:41, 10 April 2009
Line 168:		Line 168:
	BW		BW
	--[[User:Claire Robinson\|Claire Robinson]] 11:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:Claire Robinson\|Claire Robinson]] 11:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Buscombe ==
		+
		+	Hi,
		+
		+	Your page on her does not state in the intro where she currently works? Is she Business4Life?
		+
		+	Can you say so and then raise questions about her role?
		+
		+	Check her register of interests.
		+
		+	I do not understand how she can be on the PCC and business for life and in the House of Lords. There does seem some conflict here especially since business 4 life is a lobby campaign etc.
		+
		+	--[[User:David\|David]] 06:41, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 26 March 2009
Line 159:		Line 159:
	many thanks for your excellent work.		many thanks for your excellent work.
	--[[User:Claire Robinson\|Claire Robinson]] 18:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:Claire Robinson\|Claire Robinson]] 18:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== portal ==
		+
		+	Hi Kerri
		+
		+	thanks for yr message -- yes don't worry about the mismatched portal, it's a 'holding pattern' just to have some text in there until Lynn can get to it, then she will fill in the appropriate bits with her text.
		+
		+	BW
		+	--[[User:Claire Robinson\|Claire Robinson]] 11:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 1 March 2009
Line 131:		Line 131:
	Kerri.		Kerri.
	PS. i hope i get quicker at all this, everything i do on this website takes me ages!		PS. i hope i get quicker at all this, everything i do on this website takes me ages!
		+
		+	== yr message, and request ==
		+
		+	HI Kerri
		+
		+	sorry I didn't see yr message to me (pasted below for your ref) as it's on your talk page and not mine... I get an email alerting me if you leave a message on my talk page. It's a system that takes a while to get one's head around (bit like a secret society!!) and I am still finding my way on some things--hope you didn't feel like you were sending out a message into thin air because it's tempting to think that if you don't get a reply. To send a message to me you need to click on my name as it appears in the link at the end of my messages and that will take you to my talk page. then click on the plus sign next to the edit tab in the top menu and type away. Try it with this message just to leave me a 'test' message.
		+
		+	Re yr q on dates, I am sure you probably know this by now, but if there is a date of an article that you are referencing, put it in, and also put in the month you've accessed it, eg
		+	<nowiki><ref>Joe Smith, "[http://blahblah.org/blah Blah is blah]", The Guardian, 20 April 2005, accessed February 2009.</ref></nowiki>
		+
		+	If there is no date in the website you reference, then you will have something like this:
		+	<nowiki><ref>"[http://blahblah.org/About_Us About Us]", Blah website, accessed February 2009</ref></nowiki>
		+
		+	Hope that is clear. Anyway the reason I am visiting yr talk page this time is to leave a message asking you avoid referencing Lexis Nexis archive URLs for articles but instead to find a 'live' link, as hardly anyone has access to Lexis Nexis. I'm specifically thinking about the article on
		+	http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Peta_Buscombe
		+
		+	refs 4, 5 and 6 are via Lexis Nexis. Might be worth a trawl thru any articles you've done using urls from Lexis and trying to find them on live links. If they are only available thru Lexis Nexis then just give the rest of the info for the ref, ie everything in the Joe Smith example above except the url. does that make sense?
		+
		+	Kerri wrote:
		+
		+	Hello,
		+
		+	I have went through the points you both made, and tried to amend the pages I have created so far. Claire, you mentioned including the dates of articles when referencing. Does this include websites too? Where dates were written on websites I have now included them in the reference, however many websites didn't appear to have a date.
		+
		+	Thank you, K
		+
		+	many thanks for your excellent work.
		+	--[[User:Claire Robinson\|Claire Robinson]] 18:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 1 March 2009
Line 116:		Line 116:

	--[[User:David\|David]] 15:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:David\|David]] 15:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== FOI uploads ==
		+
		+	Hi,
		+
		+	I uploaded 2 of the FOI responses I received...some questions...
		+
		+	1. I put a link to both documents on the 'investigative research' page, ok? and the FDF document on the FDF page, ok?
		+	2. I'm not sure that the other documents I received would be useful to upload...
		+	- consultation on the Food Standards Agency’s Nutrient Profiling Model (the consulation sent out to FDF and AA)
		+	- a ltter from FSA inviting stakeholders to above consultation launch, sent to FDF and AA
		+
		+	Thank you!
		+	Kerri.
		+	PS. i hope i get quicker at all this, everything i do on this website takes me ages!

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 1 March 2009
Line 106:		Line 106:
	sorry..... i just hadn't referenced it correctly.		sorry..... i just hadn't referenced it correctly.
	done.		done.
		+
		+	== foi's ==
		+
		+	Hi,
		+
		+	good work on the Children's plan. Why don't you post the full reponses to your FoI requests on the site? Either upload any word docs, pdfs or images or Ifg it is an email create a page using the title of the organisation/document as the root of the page title eg DCSF: Children's plan etc...
		+
		+	?
		+
		+	--[[User:David\|David]] 15:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 26 February 2009
Line 101:		Line 101:

	Kerri.		Kerri.
		+
		+	== i worked it out! ==
		+
		+	sorry..... i just hadn't referenced it correctly.
		+	done.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 26 February 2009
Line 91:		Line 91:
	Thank you,		Thank you,
	K		K
		+
		+	== children's plan ==
		+
		+	Hi,
		+
		+	I've been working on the children's plan page.
		+	I don't know what I've done, but the resources and notes sections have disappeared.
		+	They still exist on the 'edit' section though.
		+
		+	Kerri.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:36, 12 February 2009
Line 81:		Line 81:
	thank you for your great work.		thank you for your great work.
	--[[User:Claire Robinson\|Claire Robinson]] 18:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:Claire Robinson\|Claire Robinson]] 18:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== amendments ==
		+
		+	Hello,
		+
		+	I have went through the points you both made, and tried to amend the pages I have created so far.
		+	Claire, you mentioned including the dates of articles when referencing. Does this include websites too? Where dates were written on websites I have now included them in the reference, however many websites didn't appear to have a date.
		+
		+	Thank you,
		+	K

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 11 February 2009
Line 69:		Line 69:

	--[[User:David\|David]] 13:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:David\|David]] 13:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Dates of sources ==
		+
		+	HI Kerri
		+
		+	Just a point on refs: could you include the date of the article in your ref (as well as the date you accessed the article), thus:
		+	<nowiki><ref>Joe Smith, "[http://blahblah.org Blah is blah]", The Times, 20 April 2005, accessed February 2009.</ref></nowiki>
		+
		+	Can you go through your recent articles and put these in? This kind of info is important in helping people find our sources even if they have vanished from the web or the url has moved.
		+
		+	thank you for your great work.
		+	--[[User:Claire Robinson\|Claire Robinson]] 18:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 11 February 2009
Line 61:		Line 61:

	--[[User:David\|David]] 13:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:David\|David]] 13:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== another thing ==
		+
		+	When describing official actions, plans and intentions make sure you attribute them.
		+
		+	eg don't say as you do on the DCSF page 'With the aim of improving the health of children,' but instead: 'With the declared/stated/claimed/alleged (or some synonym) aim of improving the health of children,' You don't know yet what the aim is and you should report that they claim this to be their aim. It may turn out that you think their wim is different...
		+
		+	--[[User:David\|David]] 13:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)