Mark Lynas - Revision history

Melissa Jones: book blurb

2013-10-28T05:31:00Z

book blurb

Melissa Jones at 05:25, 28 October 2013

2013-10-28T05:25:29Z

Melissa Jones: nukes film link

2013-10-10T14:04:14Z

nukes film link

Melissa Jones: cats

2012-03-06T00:46:01Z

cats

Melissa Jones: typo

2010-11-04T21:24:27Z

typo

Miriam Rose at 09:30, 7 July 2010

2010-07-07T09:30:20Z

David at 09:26, 22 April 2009

2009-04-22T09:26:25Z

David at 16:14, 13 March 2009

2009-03-13T16:14:52Z

Dieter Plehwe at 15:04, 13 March 2009

2009-03-13T15:04:51Z

Dieter Plehwe at 15:02, 13 March 2009

2009-03-13T15:02:04Z

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Mark Lynas and [[Oliver Tickell]] are two journalists who helped draft a climate change scenario study of the [[Stockholm Network]].<ref>Stockholm Network [http://www.stockholm-network.org Homepage], accessed March 13, 2009</ref> Other authors include big oil management people ([[BP]] and [[Shell]]) apart from a few academics. The study claims a distance from climate sceptical research promoted by "U.S. think tanks" according to media reports on the scenario study, although the Stockholm Network itself has previously promoted climate scepticism itself.<ref>Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO),[http://www.corporateeurope.org/ThinkTankSurvey2006.html Brussels think tanks persist in funding secrecy: ExxonMobil covertly funds EU climate skeptics], December 2006, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> The scenario study argues in favor of a radical departure from the political course taken so far (Kyoto) allegedly because the instruments are less effective than an alternative promoted in a "step change" scenario advocating taxation at the origin of the carbon chain. No information on distributional consequences are given, unfortunately. It is unclear who would carry the burden if this allegedly economic growth supporting alternative would be pursued, and the whole strategy may be primarily meant to help undermining the Kyoto diplomacy. Mark Lynas in any case has also written in favor of nuclear energy.<ref>Mark Lynas, [http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors Why greens must learn to love nuclear power], accessed March 13, 2009</ref>
-==Pro-nuclear film on BBC ahead of EDF and UK government deal==
+==From anti to pro-nuclear==
 *[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24445371 Nuclear power support from former sceptic Mark Lynas], BBC Daily Politics, 8 October 2013

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ==Publications, Contact, Resources and Notes==
 :Website: http://www.marklynas.org/
 :Website:http://www.stockholm-network.org/Conferences-and-Programmes/Energy-and-Environment/carbonscenarios

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==Background==
 Mark Lynas and [[Oliver Tickell]] are two journalists who helped draft a climate change scenario study of the [[Stockholm Network]].<ref>Stockholm Network [http://www.stockholm-network.org Homepage], accessed March 13, 2009</ref> Other authors include big oil management people ([[BP]] and [[Shell]]) apart from a few academics. The study claims a distance from climate sceptical research promoted by "U.S. think tanks" according to media reports on the scenario study, although the Stockholm Network itself has previously promoted climate scepticism itself.<ref>Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO),[http://www.corporateeurope.org/ThinkTankSurvey2006.html Brussels think tanks persist in funding secrecy: ExxonMobil covertly funds EU climate skeptics], December 2006, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> The scenario study argues in favor of a radical departure from the political course taken so far (Kyoto) allegedly because the instruments are less effective than an alternative promoted in a "step change" scenario advocating taxation at the origin of the carbon chain. No information on distributional consequences are given, unfortunately. It is unclear who would carry the burden if this allegedly economic growth supporting alternative would be pursued, and the whole strategy may be primarily meant to help undermining the Kyoto diplomacy. Mark Lynas in any case has also written in favor of nuclear energy.<ref>Mark Lynas, [http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors Why greens must learn to love nuclear power], accessed March 13, 2009</ref>
 ==Publications, Contact, Resources and Notes==
-http://www.marklynas.org/
+:Website: http://www.marklynas.org/
-http://www.stockholm-network.org/Conferences-and-Programmes/Energy-and-Environment/carbonscenarios
+:Website:http://www.stockholm-network.org/Conferences-and-Programmes/Energy-and-Environment/carbonscenarios
 ===Resources===

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:46, 6 March 2012
Line 16:		Line 16:
	<references/>		<references/>

−	[[Category:Climate Change\|Lynas, Mark]][[Category:Journalists\|Lynas, Mark~~]] [[Category:Climate Change Sceptics~~]] [[Category:Climate Science]] [[Category:~~Climate Policy Groups]] [[Category:Climate~~]]	+	[[Category:Climate Change\|Lynas, Mark]][[Category:Journalists\|Lynas, Mark]] [[Category:Climate Science\|Lynas, Mark]] [[Category:Pro-nuclear columnists\|Lynas, Mark]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Template:Climate badge}}
 ==Background==
-Mark Lynas and [[Oliver Tickell]] are two journalists who helped drafting a climate change scenario study of the [[Stockholm Network]].<ref>Stockholm Network [http://www.stockholm-network.org Homepage], accessed March 13, 2009</ref> Other authors include big oil management people ([[BP]] and [[Shell]]) apart from a few academics. The study claims a distance from climate sceptical research promoted by "U.S. think tanks" according to media reports on the scenario study, although the Stockholm Network itself has previously promoted climate scepticism itself.<ref>Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO),[http://www.corporateeurope.org/ThinkTankSurvey2006.html Brussels think tanks persist in funding secrecy: ExxonMobil covertly funds EU climate skeptics], December 2006, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> The scenario study argues in favor of a radical departure from the political course taken so far (Kyoto) allegedly because the instruments are less effective than an alternative promoted in a "step change" scenario advocating taxation at the origin of the carbon chain. No information on distributional consequences are given, unfortunately. It is unclear who would carry the burden if this allegedly economic growth supporting alternative would be pursued, and the whole strategy may be primarily meant to help undermining the Kyoto diplomacy. Mark Lynas in any case has also written in favor of nuclear energy.<ref>Mark Lynas, [http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors Why greens must learn to love nuclear power], accessed March 13, 2009</ref>
+Mark Lynas and [[Oliver Tickell]] are two journalists who helped draft a climate change scenario study of the [[Stockholm Network]].<ref>Stockholm Network [http://www.stockholm-network.org Homepage], accessed March 13, 2009</ref> Other authors include big oil management people ([[BP]] and [[Shell]]) apart from a few academics. The study claims a distance from climate sceptical research promoted by "U.S. think tanks" according to media reports on the scenario study, although the Stockholm Network itself has previously promoted climate scepticism itself.<ref>Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO),[http://www.corporateeurope.org/ThinkTankSurvey2006.html Brussels think tanks persist in funding secrecy: ExxonMobil covertly funds EU climate skeptics], December 2006, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> The scenario study argues in favor of a radical departure from the political course taken so far (Kyoto) allegedly because the instruments are less effective than an alternative promoted in a "step change" scenario advocating taxation at the origin of the carbon chain. No information on distributional consequences are given, unfortunately. It is unclear who would carry the burden if this allegedly economic growth supporting alternative would be pursued, and the whole strategy may be primarily meant to help undermining the Kyoto diplomacy. Mark Lynas in any case has also written in favor of nuclear energy.<ref>Mark Lynas, [http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors Why greens must learn to love nuclear power], accessed March 13, 2009</ref>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Background==
 Mark Lynas and [[Oliver Tickell]] are two journalists who helped drafting a climate change scenario study of the [[Stockholm Network]].<ref>Stockholm Network [http://www.stockholm-network.org Homepage], accessed March 13, 2009</ref> Other authors include big oil management people ([[BP]] and [[Shell]]) apart from a few academics. The study claims a distance from climate sceptical research promoted by "U.S. think tanks" according to media reports on the scenario study, although the Stockholm Network itself has previously promoted climate scepticism itself.<ref>Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO),[http://www.corporateeurope.org/ThinkTankSurvey2006.html Brussels think tanks persist in funding secrecy: ExxonMobil covertly funds EU climate skeptics], December 2006, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> The scenario study argues in favor of a radical departure from the political course taken so far (Kyoto) allegedly because the instruments are less effective than an alternative promoted in a "step change" scenario advocating taxation at the origin of the carbon chain. No information on distributional consequences are given, unfortunately. It is unclear who would carry the burden if this allegedly economic growth supporting alternative would be pursued, and the whole strategy may be primarily meant to help undermining the Kyoto diplomacy. Mark Lynas in any case has also written in favor of nuclear energy.<ref>Mark Lynas, [http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors Why greens must learn to love nuclear power], accessed March 13, 2009</ref>
 ==Publications, Contact, Resources and Notes==
@@ Line 23: / Line 9: @@
 ===Publications===
 ===Resources===
@@ Line 39: / Line 16: @@
 <references/>
-[[Category:Climate Change|Lynas, Mark]][[Category:Journalists|Lynas, Mark]]
+[[Category:Climate Change|Lynas, Mark]][[Category:Journalists|Lynas, Mark]] [[Category:Climate Change Sceptics]] [[Category:Climate Science]] [[Category:Climate Policy Groups]] [[Category:Climate]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:26, 22 April 2009
Line 39:		Line 39:
	<references/>		<references/>

−	[[Category:Climate Change\|Lynas, Mark]]	+	[[Category:Climate Change\|Lynas, Mark]][[Category:Journalists\|Lynas, Mark]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Background==
-Mark Lynas and [[Oliver Tickell]] are two journalists who helped drafting a climate change scenario study of the [[Stockholm Network]].<ref>http://www.stockholm-network.org, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> Other authors include big oil management people ([[BP]] and [[Shell]]) apart from a few academics. The study claims a distance from climate sceptical research promoted by "U.S. think tanks" according to media reports on the scenario study, although the Stockholm Network itself has previously promoted climate scepticism itself.<ref>http://www.corporateeurope.org/ThinkTankSurvey2006.html, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> The scenario study argues in favor of a radical departure from the political course taken so far (Kyoto) allegedly because the instruments are less effective than an alternative promoted in a "step change" scenario advocating taxation at the origin of the carbon chain. No information on distributional consequences are given, unfortunately. It is unclear who would carry the burden if this allegedly economic growth supporting alternative would be pursued, and the whole strategy may be primarily meant to help undermining the Kyoto diplomacy. Mark Lynas in any case has also written in favor of nuclear energy.<ref>Mark Lynas [http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors], accessed March 13, 2009</ref>
+Mark Lynas and [[Oliver Tickell]] are two journalists who helped drafting a climate change scenario study of the [[Stockholm Network]].<ref>http://www.stockholm-network.org, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> Other authors include big oil management people ([[BP]] and [[Shell]]) apart from a few academics. The study claims a distance from climate sceptical research promoted by "U.S. think tanks" according to media reports on the scenario study, although the Stockholm Network itself has previously promoted climate scepticism itself.<ref>http://www.corporateeurope.org/ThinkTankSurvey2006.html, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> The scenario study argues in favor of a radical departure from the political course taken so far (Kyoto) allegedly because the instruments are less effective than an alternative promoted in a "step change" scenario advocating taxation at the origin of the carbon chain. No information on distributional consequences are given, unfortunately. It is unclear who would carry the burden if this allegedly economic growth supporting alternative would be pursued, and the whole strategy may be primarily meant to help undermining the Kyoto diplomacy. Mark Lynas in any case has also written in favor of nuclear energy.<ref>Mark Lynas, Why greens must learn to love nuclear power [http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors], accessed March 13, 2009</ref>
 ==Biographical Information==