Litigious Society Project - Revision history

David at 19:01, 2 November 2011

2011-11-02T19:01:55Z

David at 19:01, 2 November 2011

2011-11-02T19:01:15Z

David at 11:22, 3 May 2011

2011-05-03T11:22:23Z

David at 11:13, 3 May 2011

2011-05-03T11:13:42Z

Barcin Uluisik: Undo revision 151671 by Barcin Uluisik (talk)

2011-03-16T18:46:27Z

Undo revision 151671 by Barcin Uluisik (talk)

Barcin Uluisik: style

2011-03-16T16:55:45Z

style

David at 20:41, 23 February 2011

2011-02-23T20:41:00Z

David at 15:12, 30 November 2010

2010-11-30T15:12:10Z

David at 15:08, 30 November 2010

2010-11-30T15:08:47Z

David: Litigious Society moved to Litigious Society Project

2010-11-30T13:58:22Z

Litigious Society moved to Litigious Society Project

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 The [[Litigious Society]] is associated with the libertarian anti-environmental [[LM network]].  It campaigned against what it saw as a 'compensation culture'.  It is now defunct.
-In 1999, [[Global Futures]] 'launched the Litigious Society Project, which resulted in the first estimation of the cost of litigation to the British economy.'<ref>Global Futures [http://www.lloyds.com/Lloyds/Press-Centre/Press-Releases/2002/06/Refusing_to_be_terrorised_managing_risk_after_September_11 Refusing to be terrorised - managing risk after September 11], Lloyds website, Mon 17 Jun 2002</ref> Such an estimate was also contained in [[Frank Furedi]]'s report published by the conservative [[Centre for Policy Studies]], which suggests that this report may have been linked with the [[Litigious Society Project]].  Furedi notes in the acknowledgements that 'I am particularly grateful to [[Tracey Brown|Tracey C. Brown]], co-ordinator of the [[Litigious Society Project]] for sharing so much of her knowledge of the subject.<ref name="Furedi">Frank Furedi, '[http://web.archive.org/web/20050520213617/http://www.cps.org.uk/pdf/pub/43.pdf  Courting Mistrust: The Hidden Growth of a Culture of Litigation in Britain], Centre for Policy Studies, 1999, p. 2</ref> Furedi also notes that another [[LM network]] associate [[Bruno Waterfield]] was the researcher on the CPS pamphlet and that 'support towards research for this study was given by the [[Institute for Policy Research]]'<ref name="Furedi"/> a conservative foundation that channels funding to market fundamentalist think tanks such as the CPS, [[Open Europe]], [[Politeia]] and
+In 1999, [[Global Futures]] 'launched the Litigious Society Project, which resulted in the first estimation of the cost of litigation to the British economy.'<ref>Global Futures [http://www.lloyds.com/Lloyds/Press-Centre/Press-Releases/2002/06/Refusing_to_be_terrorised_managing_risk_after_September_11 Refusing to be terrorised - managing risk after September 11], Lloyds website, Mon 17 Jun 2002</ref> Such an estimate was also contained in [[Frank Furedi]]'s report published by the conservative [[Centre for Policy Studies]], which suggests that this report may have been linked with the [[Litigious Society Project]].  Furedi notes in the acknowledgements that 'I am particularly grateful to [[Tracey Brown|Tracey C. Brown]], co-ordinator of the [[Litigious Society Project]] for sharing so much of her knowledge of the subject.<ref name="Furedi">Frank Furedi, '[http://web.archive.org/web/20050520213617/http://www.cps.org.uk/pdf/pub/43.pdf  Courting Mistrust: The Hidden Growth of a Culture of Litigation in Britain], Centre for Policy Studies, 1999, p. 2</ref> Furedi also notes that another [[LM network]] associate [[Bruno Waterfield]] was the researcher on the CPS pamphlet and that 'support towards research for this study was given by the [[Institute for Policy Research]]'<ref name="Furedi"/> a conservative foundation that channels funding to market fundamentalist think tanks such as the CPS, [[Open Europe]], [[Politeia]] and the [[European Policy Forum]]
 ==People==
 *[[Tracey Brown]], co-ordinator<ref name="Furedi"/>

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 The [[Litigious Society]] is associated with the libertarian anti-environmental [[LM network]].  It campaigned against what it saw as a 'compensation culture'.  It is now defunct.
-In 1999, [[Global Futures]] 'launched the Litigious Society Project, which resulted in the first estimation of the cost of litigation to the British economy.'<ref>Global Futures [http://www.lloyds.com/Lloyds/Press-Centre/Press-Releases/2002/06/Refusing_to_be_terrorised_managing_risk_after_September_11 Refusing to be terrorised - managing risk after September 11], Lloyds website, Mon 17 Jun 2002</ref> Such an estimate was also contained in [[Frank Furedi]]'s report published by the conservative [[Centre for Policy Studies]], which suggests that this report may have been linked with the [[Litigious Society Project]].  Furedi notes in the acknowledgements that 'I am particularly grateful to [[Tracey Brown|Tracey C. Brown]], co-ordinator of the [[Litigious Society Project]] for sharing so much of her knowledge of the subject.<ref name="Furedi">Frank Furedi, '[http://web.archive.org/web/20050520213617/http://www.cps.org.uk/pdf/pub/43.pdf  Courting Mistrust: The Hidden Growth of a Culture of Litigation in Britain], Centre for Policy Studies, 1999, p. 2</ref> Furedi also notes that another [[LM network]] associate [[Bruno Waterfield]] was the researcher on the CPS pamphlet and that 'support towards research for this study was given by the [[Institute for Policy Research]].'<ref name="Furedi"/>
+In 1999, [[Global Futures]] 'launched the Litigious Society Project, which resulted in the first estimation of the cost of litigation to the British economy.'<ref>Global Futures [http://www.lloyds.com/Lloyds/Press-Centre/Press-Releases/2002/06/Refusing_to_be_terrorised_managing_risk_after_September_11 Refusing to be terrorised - managing risk after September 11], Lloyds website, Mon 17 Jun 2002</ref> Such an estimate was also contained in [[Frank Furedi]]'s report published by the conservative [[Centre for Policy Studies]], which suggests that this report may have been linked with the [[Litigious Society Project]].  Furedi notes in the acknowledgements that 'I am particularly grateful to [[Tracey Brown|Tracey C. Brown]], co-ordinator of the [[Litigious Society Project]] for sharing so much of her knowledge of the subject.<ref name="Furedi">Frank Furedi, '[http://web.archive.org/web/20050520213617/http://www.cps.org.uk/pdf/pub/43.pdf  Courting Mistrust: The Hidden Growth of a Culture of Litigation in Britain], Centre for Policy Studies, 1999, p. 2</ref> Furedi also notes that another [[LM network]] associate [[Bruno Waterfield]] was the researcher on the CPS pamphlet and that 'support towards research for this study was given by the [[Institute for Policy Research]]'<ref name="Furedi"/> a conservative foundation that channels funding to market fundamentalist think tanks such as the CPS, [[Open Europe]], [[Politeia]] and
 ==People==
 *[[Tracey Brown]], co-ordinator<ref name="Furedi"/>

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 The [[Litigious Society]] is associated with the libertarian anti-environmental [[LM network]].  It campaigned against what it saw as a 'compensation culture'.  It is now defunct.
-In 1999, [[Global Futures]] 'launched the Litigious Society Project, which resulted in the first estimation of the cost of litigation to the British economy.'<ref>Global Futures [http://www.lloyds.com/Lloyds/Press-Centre/Press-Releases/2002/06/Refusing_to_be_terrorised_managing_risk_after_September_11 Refusing to be terrorised - managing risk after September 11], Lloyds website, Mon 17 Jun 2002</ref>
+In 1999, [[Global Futures]] 'launched the Litigious Society Project, which resulted in the first estimation of the cost of litigation to the British economy.'<ref>Global Futures [http://www.lloyds.com/Lloyds/Press-Centre/Press-Releases/2002/06/Refusing_to_be_terrorised_managing_risk_after_September_11 Refusing to be terrorised - managing risk after September 11], Lloyds website, Mon 17 Jun 2002</ref> Such an estimate was also contained in [[Frank Furedi]]'s report published by the conservative [[Centre for Policy Studies]], which suggests that this report may have been linked with the [[Litigious Society Project]].  Furedi notes in the acknowledgements that 'I am particularly grateful to [[Tracey Brown|Tracey C. Brown]], co-ordinator of the [[Litigious Society Project]] for sharing so much of her knowledge of the subject.<ref name="Furedi">Frank Furedi, '[http://web.archive.org/web/20050520213617/http://www.cps.org.uk/pdf/pub/43.pdf  Courting Mistrust: The Hidden Growth of a Culture of Litigation in Britain], Centre for Policy Studies, 1999, p. 2</ref> Furedi also notes that another [[LM network]] associate [[Bruno Waterfield]] was the researcher on the CPS pamphlet and that 'support towards research for this study was given by the [[Institute for Policy Research]].'<ref name="Furedi"/>
 ==People==
-*[[Tracey Brown]], co-ordinator<ref>Frank Furedi, '[http://web.archive.org/web/20050520213617/http://www.cps.org.uk/pdf/pub/43.pdf  Courting Mistrust: The Hidden Growth of a Culture of Litigation in Britain], Centre for Policy Studies, 1999, p. 2</ref>
+*[[Tracey Brown]], co-ordinator<ref name="Furedi"/>
 ==Notes==

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 In 1999, [[Global Futures]] 'launched the Litigious Society Project, which resulted in the first estimation of the cost of litigation to the British economy.'<ref>Global Futures [http://www.lloyds.com/Lloyds/Press-Centre/Press-Releases/2002/06/Refusing_to_be_terrorised_managing_risk_after_September_11 Refusing to be terrorised - managing risk after September 11], Lloyds website, Mon 17 Jun 2002</ref>
 ==People==
-*[[Tracey Brown]], co-ordinator<ref>Frank Furedi, '[http://www.cps.org.uk/cps_catalog/CPS_assets/154_ProductPreviewFile.pdf  Courting Mistrust: The Hidden Growth of a Culture of Litigation in Britain], Centre for Policy Studies, 1999, p. 2</ref>
+*[[Tracey Brown]], co-ordinator<ref>Frank Furedi, '[http://web.archive.org/web/20050520213617/http://www.cps.org.uk/pdf/pub/43.pdf  Courting Mistrust: The Hidden Growth of a Culture of Litigation in Britain], Centre for Policy Studies, 1999, p. 2</ref>
 ==Notes==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Powerbase:LM network: Resources}}
 The [[Litigious Society]] is associated with the libertarian anti-environmental [[LM network]].  It campaigned against what it saw as a 'compensation culture'.  It is now defunct.
 In 1999, [[Global Futures]] 'launched the Litigious Society Project, which resulted in the first estimation of the cost of litigation to the British economy.'<ref>Global Futures [http://www.lloyds.com/Lloyds/Press-Centre/Press-Releases/2002/06/Refusing_to_be_terrorised_managing_risk_after_September_11 Refusing to be terrorised - managing risk after September 11], Lloyds website, Mon 17 Jun 2002</ref>
 ==People==
 *[[Tracey Brown]], co-ordinator<ref>Frank Furedi, '[http://www.cps.org.uk/cps_catalog/CPS_assets/154_ProductPreviewFile.pdf  Courting Mistrust: The Hidden Growth of a Culture of Litigation in Britain], Centre for Policy Studies, 1999, p. 2</ref>
 ==Notes==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 23 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+
		+	{{Powerbase:LM network: Resources}}
	The [[Litigious Society]] is associated with the libertarian anti-environmental [[LM network]]. It campaigned against what it saw as a 'compensation culture'. It is now defunct.		The [[Litigious Society]] is associated with the libertarian anti-environmental [[LM network]]. It campaigned against what it saw as a 'compensation culture'. It is now defunct.

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:58, 30 November 2010
(No difference)