Laurie Mylroie - Revision history

Idrees: /* September 17 */

2010-07-07T11:36:03Z

September 17

Idrees: /* Before and After 9/11 */

2010-07-07T11:26:34Z

Before and After 9/11

Idrees: /* September 13 */

2010-07-07T10:50:28Z

September 13

Idrees: /* September 13 */

2010-07-07T10:47:57Z

September 13

Idrees: /* September 13 */

2010-07-07T10:46:47Z

September 13

Idrees: /* Before 9/11 */

2010-07-07T10:42:51Z

Before 9/11

Idrees: /* September 13 */

2010-07-07T10:41:52Z

September 13

Idrees: /* Before and After 9/11 */

2010-07-07T10:40:53Z

Before and After 9/11

Idrees: /* Before and After 9/11 */

2010-07-07T10:32:03Z

Before and After 9/11

Idrees: /* Before and After 9/11 */

2010-07-07T10:30:49Z

Before and After 9/11

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 Dick Cheney appears on NBC's Meet The Press for his infamous 'dark side' interivew. In the interview he emphatically rejects a connection between Iraq and the 9/11 attacks.
 ===September 17===
-Mylroie once again presses the case against Iraq, and, once again, Woolsey echoes the charge referencing Mylroie’s work.
+Mylroie once again presses the case against Iraq, and, once again, Woolsey echoes the charge referencing Mylroie’s work.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, ‘Familiar Rogue’, National Review, 17 September 2001</ref><ref>R. James Woolsey, ‘Saddam may be target Americans are looking for’, The Daily Telegraph, 17 September 2001</ref>
 As recently as 10 February 2008, in a letter to Washington Post, Mylroie was insisting that Iraq had a role in the 9/11 attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/07/AR2008020703036_pf.html Letter: Matters of Interpretation], ''Washington Post'', 10 February 2008</ref>

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 ===September 14===
 Mylroie joins [[Newt Gingrich]], [[Jeane Kirkpatrick]] and [[David Wurmser]] at an AEI panel to press the case against Iraq.  Later the same day Mylroie appears on Fox’s O’Reilly Factor to allege that Iraq carried out the ’93 WTC bombing. ‘It would be good to get rid of Bin Laden,’ she opines, but ‘It wouldn't be as meaningful as getting rid of Saddam Hussein's regime.’<ref>‘Special Report: America United,’ Fox The O’ Reilly Factor, 14 September 2001</ref>
 As recently as 10 February 2008, in a letter to Washington Post, Mylroie was insisting that Iraq had a role in the 9/11 attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/07/AR2008020703036_pf.html Letter: Matters of Interpretation], ''Washington Post'', 10 February 2008</ref>

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 ===September 13===
 Mylroie publishes an article in the Wall Street Journal alleging that Iraq was behind the attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.lauriemylroie.com/Publications/WSJ9-13-2001.html 'The Iraqi Connection:  Did Osama bin Laden act alone? Not likely,'] ''Wall Street Journal'', 13 September 2001</ref> The message is reinforced by [[James Woolsey]] and British neonconservative [[Michael Gove]].<ref>R. James Woolsey, [http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/blood-baath 'Blood Baath,’] ''The New Republic'', 24 September 2001</ref><ref>Michael Gove, ‘Be warned: drawing a single tooth will not stop a mad dog’, The Times, 13 September 2001</ref> Both reference Mylroie's work.
 As recently as 10 February 2008, in a letter to Washington Post, Mylroie was insisting that Iraq had a role in the 9/11 attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/07/AR2008020703036_pf.html Letter: Matters of Interpretation], ''Washington Post'', 10 February 2008</ref>

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Mylroie writes an article alleging that Iraq iss behind the attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, ‘Who is to blame?’ The Globe and Mail, 12 September 2001</ref> Woolsey, [[Charles Krauthammer]], and [[Jim Hoagland]] also repeat the allegations, all referencing Mylroie.<ref>R. James Woolsey and Mansoor Ijaz, ‘Revenge is a dish best served cold,’ Los Angeles Times, 12 September 2001</ref><ref>Charles Krauthammer, ‘To War, Not to Court’, Washington Post, 12 September 2001. </ref><ref>Jim Hoagland, ‘Hidden hand of terror,’ Washington Post, 12 September 2001</ref>
 ===September 13===
-Mylroie publishes an article in the Wall Street Journal alleging that Iraq was behind the attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.lauriemylroie.com/Publications/WSJ9-13-2001.html 'The Iraqi Connection:  Did Osama bin Laden act alone? Not likely,'] ''Wall Street Journal'', 13 September 2001</ref> The message is reinforced by [[James Woolsey]]<ref>R. James Woolsey, [http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/blood-baath 'Blood Baath,’] ''The New Republic'', 24 September 2001</ref> and British neonconservative [[Michael Gove]]<ref>Michael Gove, ‘Be warned: drawing a single tooth will not stop a mad dog’, The Times, 13 September 2001</ref>. Both reference Mylroie's work.
+Mylroie publishes an article in the Wall Street Journal alleging that Iraq was behind the attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.lauriemylroie.com/Publications/WSJ9-13-2001.html 'The Iraqi Connection:  Did Osama bin Laden act alone? Not likely,'] ''Wall Street Journal'', 13 September 2001</ref> The message is reinforced by [[James Woolsey]] and British neonconservative [[Michael Gove]].<ref>R. James Woolsey, [http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/blood-baath 'Blood Baath,’] ''The New Republic'', 24 September 2001</ref><ref>Michael Gove, ‘Be warned: drawing a single tooth will not stop a mad dog’, The Times, 13 September 2001</ref> Both reference Mylroie's work.
 As recently as 10 February 2008, in a letter to Washington Post, Mylroie was insisting that Iraq had a role in the 9/11 attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/07/AR2008020703036_pf.html Letter: Matters of Interpretation], ''Washington Post'', 10 February 2008</ref>

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Mylroie writes an article alleging that Iraq iss behind the attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, ‘Who is to blame?’ The Globe and Mail, 12 September 2001</ref> Woolsey, [[Charles Krauthammer]], and [[Jim Hoagland]] also repeat the allegations, all referencing Mylroie.<ref>R. James Woolsey and Mansoor Ijaz, ‘Revenge is a dish best served cold,’ Los Angeles Times, 12 September 2001</ref><ref>Charles Krauthammer, ‘To War, Not to Court’, Washington Post, 12 September 2001. </ref><ref>Jim Hoagland, ‘Hidden hand of terror,’ Washington Post, 12 September 2001</ref>
 ===September 13===
-Mylroie publishes an article in the Wall Street Journal alleging that Iraq was behind the attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.lauriemylroie.com/Publications/WSJ9-13-2001.html 'The Iraqi Connection:  Did Osama bin Laden act alone? Not likely,'] ''Wall Street Journal'', 13 September 2001</ref> Another was published on the same day by [[James Woolsey]] who also invoked Mylroie's work to alleged an Iraqi role in the attacks.<ref>R. James Woolsey, [http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/blood-baath 'Blood Baath,’] ''The New Republic'', 24 September 2001</ref>
+Mylroie publishes an article in the Wall Street Journal alleging that Iraq was behind the attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.lauriemylroie.com/Publications/WSJ9-13-2001.html 'The Iraqi Connection:  Did Osama bin Laden act alone? Not likely,'] ''Wall Street Journal'', 13 September 2001</ref> The message is reinforced by [[James Woolsey]]<ref>R. James Woolsey, [http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/blood-baath 'Blood Baath,’] ''The New Republic'', 24 September 2001</ref> and British neonconservative [[Michael Gove]]<ref>Michael Gove, ‘Be warned: drawing a single tooth will not stop a mad dog’, The Times, 13 September 2001</ref>. Both reference Mylroie's work.
 As recently as 10 February 2008, in a letter to Washington Post, Mylroie was insisting that Iraq had a role in the 9/11 attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/07/AR2008020703036_pf.html Letter: Matters of Interpretation], ''Washington Post'', 10 February 2008</ref>

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ==Before and After 9/11==
 ===Before 9/11===
-According to former White House Counterterrorism Coordinator Richard Clarke, [[Paul Wolfowitz]] invokes Mylroie's book Study of Revenge to allege a link between Iraq and the 1993 WTC attack during the very first meeting of the deputies of the National Security Council on 30 April 2001.<ref>Richard Clarke, ''Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror'' (London: Simon and Schuster, 2004): 30, 95, 232</ref>
+According to former White House Counterterrorism Coordinator Richard Clarke, [[Paul Wolfowitz]] invokes Mylroie's book Study of Revenge to allege a link between Iraq and the 1993 WTC attack during the very first meeting of the deputies of the National Security Council on 30 April 2001.<ref>Richard Clarke, ''Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror'' (London: Simon and Schuster, 2004): 30, 95, 232</ref> Earlier in the year [[James Woolsey]] had travelled to London in an attempt to confirm Mylroie's thesis. After September 11 he would visit again with the blessing of [[Paul Wolfowitz]]. The trip caused much consternation at the State Department and the CIA who only found out about it after the Welsh police called the US Embassy to confirm if Woolsey was indeed on official business as he claimed.<ref>Clarke (2004)</ref>
 ===September 12===
 Mylroie writes an article alleging that Iraq iss behind the attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, ‘Who is to blame?’ The Globe and Mail, 12 September 2001</ref> Woolsey, [[Charles Krauthammer]], and [[Jim Hoagland]] also repeat the allegations, all referencing Mylroie.<ref>R. James Woolsey and Mansoor Ijaz, ‘Revenge is a dish best served cold,’ Los Angeles Times, 12 September 2001</ref><ref>Charles Krauthammer, ‘To War, Not to Court’, Washington Post, 12 September 2001. </ref><ref>Jim Hoagland, ‘Hidden hand of terror,’ Washington Post, 12 September 2001</ref>

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 According to former White House Counterterrorism Coordinator Richard Clarke, [[Paul Wolfowitz]] invoked Mylroie's book Study of Revenge to allege a link between Iraq and the 1993 WTC attack during the very first meeting of the deputies of the National Security Council on 30 April 2001.<ref>Richard Clarke, ''Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror'' (London: Simon and Schuster, 2004): 30, 95, 232</ref> On September 12, Mylroie wrote an article alleging that Iraq was behind the attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, ‘Who is to blame?’ The Globe and Mail, 12 September 2001</ref> Woolsey, [[Charles Krauthammer]], and [[Jim Hoagland]] also repeated the allegations, all referencing Mylroie's work.<ref>R. James Woolsey and Mansoor Ijaz, ‘Revenge is a dish best served cold,’ Los Angeles Times, 12 September 2001; Laurie Mylroie, ‘Who is to blame?’ The Globe and Mail, 12 September 2001</ref><ref>Charles Krauthammer, ‘To War, Not to Court’, Washington Post, 12 September 2001. </ref><ref>Jim Hoagland, ‘Hidden hand of terror,’ Washington Post, 12 September 2001</ref> The next day, on September 13, Mylroie published an article in the Wall Street Journal alleging that Iraq was behind the attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.lauriemylroie.com/Publications/WSJ9-13-2001.html 'The Iraqi Connection:  Did Osama bin Laden act alone? Not likely,'] ''Wall Street Journal'', 13 September 2001</ref> Another was published on the same day by [[James Woolsey]] who also invoked Mylroie's work to alleged an Iraqi role in the attacks.<ref>R. James Woolsey, [http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/blood-baath 'Blood Baath,’] ''The New Republic'', 24 September 2001</ref> Earlier in the year Woolsey had travelled to London in an attempt to confirm Mylroie's thesis. After September 11 he would visit against with the blessing of Wolfowitz. The trip caused much consternation at the State Department and the CIA who only found out about it after the Welsh police called the US Embassy to confirm if Woolsey was indeed on official business as he claimed.<ref> Clarke (2004)</ref>
-As recently as 10 February 2008, in a letter to Washington Post, Mylroie insisted that Iraq had a role in the 9/11 attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/07/AR2008020703036_pf.html Letter: Matters of Interpretation], ''Washington Post'', 10 February 2008</ref>
+As recently as 10 February 2008, in a letter to Washington Post, Mylroie was insisting that Iraq had a role in the 9/11 attacks.<ref>Laurie Mylroie, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/07/AR2008020703036_pf.html Letter: Matters of Interpretation], ''Washington Post'', 10 February 2008</ref>
 ==Promoters==