James Lawford Davies - Revision history

Claire Robinson: /* Views */

2012-11-28T12:03:22Z

Views

Claire Robinson: /* Views */

2012-11-28T01:23:09Z

Views

Claire Robinson: /* Views */

2012-11-28T01:22:39Z

Views

Claire Robinson: /* Views */

2012-11-28T01:21:19Z

Views

Claire Robinson at 01:21, 28 November 2012

2012-11-28T01:21:00Z

Claire Robinson at 01:00, 28 November 2012

2012-11-28T01:00:53Z

Claire Robinson at 18:09, 27 November 2012

2012-11-27T18:09:18Z

Claire Robinson at 17:05, 27 November 2012

2012-11-27T17:05:08Z

Claire Robinson: Created page with "Text needed here. Invent your own subheads as needed, formatted as those below. ==Affiliations== ==Contact== :Address: :... :... :... :... : :Phone: : ... :Email: :... :W..."

2012-11-27T16:59:31Z

Created page with "Text needed here. Invent your own subheads as needed, formatted as those below. ==Affiliations== ==Contact== :Address: :... :... :... :... : :Phone: : ... :Email: :... :W..."

New page

Text needed here. Invent your own subheads as needed, formatted as those below.

==Affiliations==

==Contact==
:Address:
:...
:...
:...
:...
:

:Phone:
: ...

:Email:
:...

:Website:
:...

==Resources==

==Notes==
<references/>

[[Category:GM|Lawford Davies, James]]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ==Views==
-James Lawford Davies was one of several experts ([[Ann Furedi]] and [[Robert Winston]] were others) who provided ready-made press quotes for the [[Science Media Centre]] in response to the UK government's 2006 Dept of Health review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. The experts expressed enthusiasm for reducing restrictions on reproductive technologies such as cloning and IVF, and most expressed disappointment that the review supported restrictions or bans on certain technologies. In his quote, Lawford Davies disagreed with the Dept of Health's suggestion of a ban on the creation of human-animal hybrids for research purposes and complained that "the proposals do little to move forward from the status quo".<ref>Science Media Centre (2006), [http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/scientists-respond-to-the-doh-review-of-the-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-act-2/ scientists respond to the DoH review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act], Dec 13, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
+James Lawford Davies was one of several experts ([[Ann Furedi]] and [[Robert Winston]] were others) who provided ready-made press quotes for the [[Science Media Centre]] in response to the UK government's 2006 Dept of Health review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. The experts expressed enthusiasm for reducing restrictions on reproductive technologies such as cloning and IVF, and disappointment that the review supported restrictions or bans on certain technologies. In his quote, Lawford Davies disagreed with the Dept of Health's suggestion of a ban on the creation of human-animal hybrids for research purposes and complained that "the proposals do little to move forward from the status quo".<ref>Science Media Centre (2006), [http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/scientists-respond-to-the-doh-review-of-the-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-act-2/ scientists respond to the DoH review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act], Dec 13, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
 ==Contact==

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ==Views==
-James Lawford Davies was one of several experts ([[Ann Furedi]] and [[Robert Winston]] were others) who provided ready-made press quotes for the [[Science Media Centre]] in response to the UK government's 2006 Dept of Health review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. The experts all expressed enthusiasm for reducing restrictions on reproductive technologies such as cloning and IVF, and most expressed disappointment that the review supported restrictions or bans on certain technologies. In his quote, Lawford Davies disagreed with the Dept of Health's suggestion of a ban on the creation of human-animal hybrids for research purposes and complained that "the proposals do little to move forward from the status quo".<ref>Science Media Centre (2006), [http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/scientists-respond-to-the-doh-review-of-the-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-act-2/ scientists respond to the DoH review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act], Dec 13, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
+James Lawford Davies was one of several experts ([[Ann Furedi]] and [[Robert Winston]] were others) who provided ready-made press quotes for the [[Science Media Centre]] in response to the UK government's 2006 Dept of Health review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. The experts expressed enthusiasm for reducing restrictions on reproductive technologies such as cloning and IVF, and most expressed disappointment that the review supported restrictions or bans on certain technologies. In his quote, Lawford Davies disagreed with the Dept of Health's suggestion of a ban on the creation of human-animal hybrids for research purposes and complained that "the proposals do little to move forward from the status quo".<ref>Science Media Centre (2006), [http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/scientists-respond-to-the-doh-review-of-the-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-act-2/ scientists respond to the DoH review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act], Dec 13, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
 ==Contact==

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ==Views==
-James Lawford Davies was one of several experts who provided ready-made press quotes for the [[Science Media Centre]] in response to the UK government's 2006 Dept of Health review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. The experts all expressed enthusiasm for reducing restrictions on reproductive technologies such as cloning and IVF, and most expressed disappointment that the review supported restrictions or bans on certain technologies. In his quote, Lawford Davies disagreed with the Dept of Health's suggestion of a ban on the creation of human-animal hybrids for research purposes and complained that "the proposals do little to move forward from the status quo".<ref>Science Media Centre (2006), [http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/scientists-respond-to-the-doh-review-of-the-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-act-2/ scientists respond to the DoH review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act], Dec 13, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
+James Lawford Davies was one of several experts ([[Ann Furedi]] and [[Robert Winston]] were others) who provided ready-made press quotes for the [[Science Media Centre]] in response to the UK government's 2006 Dept of Health review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. The experts all expressed enthusiasm for reducing restrictions on reproductive technologies such as cloning and IVF, and most expressed disappointment that the review supported restrictions or bans on certain technologies. In his quote, Lawford Davies disagreed with the Dept of Health's suggestion of a ban on the creation of human-animal hybrids for research purposes and complained that "the proposals do little to move forward from the status quo".<ref>Science Media Centre (2006), [http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/scientists-respond-to-the-doh-review-of-the-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-act-2/ scientists respond to the DoH review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act], Dec 13, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
 ==Contact==

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ==Views==
-James Lawford Davies was one of several experts who provided ready-made press quotes for the [[Science Media Centre]] in response to the UK government's 2006 Dept of Health review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. The experts all expressed enthusiasm for reducing restrictions on reproductive technologies such as cloning and IVF, and most expressed disappointment that the review supported restrictions or bans on certain technologies. In his quote, Lawford Davies disagreed with the Dept of Health's suggestion of a ban on the creation of human-animal hybrids for research purposes and complainted that "the proposals do little to move forward from the status quo".<ref>Science Media Centre (2006), [http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/scientists-respond-to-the-doh-review-of-the-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-act-2/ scientists respond to the DoH review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act], Dec 13, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
+James Lawford Davies was one of several experts who provided ready-made press quotes for the [[Science Media Centre]] in response to the UK government's 2006 Dept of Health review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. The experts all expressed enthusiasm for reducing restrictions on reproductive technologies such as cloning and IVF, and most expressed disappointment that the review supported restrictions or bans on certain technologies. In his quote, Lawford Davies disagreed with the Dept of Health's suggestion of a ban on the creation of human-animal hybrids for research purposes and complained that "the proposals do little to move forward from the status quo".<ref>Science Media Centre (2006), [http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/scientists-respond-to-the-doh-review-of-the-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-act-2/ scientists respond to the DoH review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act], Dec 13, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
 ==Contact==

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 :Partnership; 5001-10,000 employees; Law Practice industry
 :2007 – 2009 (2 years)
 ==Contact==

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:00, 28 November 2012
Line 44:		Line 44:

	[[Category:GM\|Lawford Davies, James]]		[[Category:GM\|Lawford Davies, James]]
		+	[[Category:Human Genetics\|Lawford Davies, James]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 27 November 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[James Lawford Davies]] is a partner in the London-based law firm [[Lawford Davies Denoon]]. On his LinkedIn page he states, "I specialise in life sciences, particularly human tissue and cells, reproductive and genetic technologies."<ref>LinkedIn (2012) [http://www.linkedin.com/pub/james-lawford-davies/10/756/a26 James Lawford Davies], acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>		[[James Lawford Davies]] is a partner in the London-based law firm [[Lawford Davies Denoon]]. On his LinkedIn page he states, "I specialise in life sciences, particularly human tissue and cells, reproductive and genetic technologies."<ref>LinkedIn (2012) [http://www.linkedin.com/pub/james-lawford-davies/10/756/a26 James Lawford Davies], acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>

		+	The Lawford Davies Denoon website says:
		+	:James specialises in the law and regulation relating to reproductive and genetic technologies, human tissue and cells, and related research. He advises a large number of clinics and research centres licensed by the [[Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority]] (HFEA) and has been involved in most of the leading cases relating to assisted reproduction, embryo and stem cell research.<ref>Lawford Davies Denoon (2012) [http://www.lawforddaviesdenoon.com/index.php?james-lawford-davies James Lawford Davies], acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
	==Background==		==Background==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Text needed here. Invent your own subheads as needed, formatted as those below.
+[[James Lawford Davies]] is a partner in the London-based law firm [[Lawford Davies Denoon]]. On his LinkedIn page he states, "I specialise in life sciences, particularly human tissue and cells, reproductive and genetic technologies."<ref>LinkedIn (2012) [http://www.linkedin.com/pub/james-lawford-davies/10/756/a26 James Lawford Davies], acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
-==Affiliations==
+==Background==
 ==Contact==