EN officers - Revision history

Peter Salmon at 16:41, 11 November 2019

2019-11-11T16:41:20Z

Peter Salmon at 16:28, 11 November 2019

2019-11-11T16:28:51Z

Peter Salmon at 16:24, 11 November 2019

2019-11-11T16:24:40Z

Peter Salmon at 16:11, 11 November 2019

2019-11-11T16:11:22Z

Peter Salmon at 11:24, 10 November 2019

2019-11-10T11:24:38Z

Peter Salmon at 11:23, 10 November 2019

2019-11-10T11:23:45Z

Peter Salmon at 17:57, 7 November 2019

2019-11-07T17:57:48Z

Peter Salmon at 18:01, 6 November 2019

2019-11-06T18:01:30Z

Peter Salmon at 17:48, 6 November 2019

2019-11-06T17:48:56Z

Peter Salmon at 13:49, 5 November 2019

2019-11-05T13:49:47Z

@@ Line 141: / Line 141: @@
 | ''likely to come''
 | cover officer
-| Seconded 2005-2006 to NPOIU where cover officer for an unsuccessful and questionable undercover deployment; also involved in the winding up of the SDS.<ref name="mitting.npoiu.mindedto3"/> Same as N367
+| Seconded 2005-2006 to NPOIU where cover officer for an unsuccessful and questionable undercover deployment; also involved in the winding up of the SDS.<ref name="mitting.npoiu.mindedto3"/> Same as N367.
 |- style="vertical-align:top;"
 | EN53
@@ Line 193: / Line 193: @@
 | ''[[Edward_David_Jones_(alias)|Dave Jones]]''
 | undercover
-| Same as HN66. Real name restricted. Deployed against London Rising Tide and the Camp for Climate Action (Drax) 2005-2007.
+| Same as HN66. Real name restricted. Deployed against London Rising Tide and the Camp for Climate Action (Drax) 2005-2007 for SDS, but against the WOMBLES for six months in 2001, using the same alias.
 |- style="vertical-align:top;"
 | EN407

@@ Line 179: / Line 179: @@
 | [[EN289]]
 | ''unknown''
-| undercover
+| undercover? / other
 | Real name restricted with application over cover name to be determined later,<ref name="cti.explan.note.2May2018"/> Mitting writing:
 : EN289 undertook ad hoc deployments for the Animal National Rights Index/the National Public Order Intelligence Unit in the late 1990s, attending and reporting on approximately 6 marches. EN289 was instructed to, and did, research and obtain the identity of a deceased child. The nature of the deployments was such that EN289 did not have to use it. Save in one respect, the information and evidence which EN289 could provide is of peripheral relevance to the Inquiry.

@@ Line 180: / Line 180: @@
 | ''unknown''
 | undercover
 | Real name restricted with application over cover name to be determined later,<ref name="cti.explan.note.2May2018"/> Mitting writing:
-:EN289 is a serving police officer. EN289 undertook ad hoc deployments for the Animal National Rights Index/the National Public Order Intelligence Unit in the late 1990s, attending and reporting on approximately 6 marches. EN289 was instructed to, and did, research and obtain the identity of a deceased child. The nature of the deployments was such that EN289 did not have to use it. Save in one respect, the information and evidence which EN289 could provide is of peripheral relevance to the Inquiry. That respect is the fact that EN289 was instructed to obtain the identity of a deceased child. Given that the cover name was not used, no purpose would be served by determining EN289's application for a restriction order in respect of the cover name at this stage. : Publication of the real name of EN289 would not serve to permit the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference, might impair performance of police duties and might have some impact on the mental health of EN289. In those circumstances, publication of the real name would not be in the public interest and would risk interference with the right to respect for private and family life of EN289 which would not be justified...<ref name="mitting.npoiu.mindedto1.2May2018"/>
+: EN289 undertook ad hoc deployments for the Animal National Rights Index/the National Public Order Intelligence Unit in the late 1990s, attending and reporting on approximately 6 marches. EN289 was instructed to, and did, research and obtain the identity of a deceased child. The nature of the deployments was such that EN289 did not have to use it. Save in one respect, the information and evidence which EN289 could provide is of peripheral relevance to the Inquiry.
 |- style="vertical-align:top;"
 | EN291

@@ Line 227: / Line 227: @@
 | 2011-2013 served with the 'successor unit' to the NPOIU; real and cover names restricted.
 |- style="vertical-align:top;"
-| EN1001
+| [[EN1001]]
 | ''restricted''
-| cover officer
+| other
-| Real and cover names to be restricted,<ref name="cti.explan.note.2May2018"/> with Mitting writing:
+| Real and cover names to be restricted; his role was described by Mitting as:
-:EN1001 was not seconded to the [NPOIU], but performed a peripheral supporting role in one operation for a short time in the late 2000s. It is unlikely that the Inquiry will need to receive or take into account evidence from EN1001 so as to permit it to fulfil its terms of reference. EN1001 was and is a serving police officer with a provincial force. In that capacity EN 1001 has undertaken routine criminal undercover deployments, some of which were dangerous. The work done by EN1001 and that done by other police officers would be substantially impaired if either the cover or real name of EN1001 were to be published. It is not in the public interest that either should occur. Further, publication of either would interfere with the right to respect for the private and family life of EN1001 and would not be justified<ref name="mitting.npoiu.mindedto1.2May2018"/>
+:EN1001 was not seconded to the [NPOIU], but performed a peripheral supporting role in one operation for a short time in the late 2000s.<ref name="mitting.npoiu.mindedto1.2May2018"/>
 |}

@@ Line 226: / Line 226: @@
 | cover officer
 | 2011-2013 served with the 'successor unit' to the NPOIU; real and cover names restricted.
 | EN1001
 | ''restricted''

@@ Line 154: / Line 154: @@
 | Minded to refuse application to restrict real name with closed hearing on this to take place in late 2018.<ref name="gray.ucpi.npoiu.explan.note3"/> Temporary head for nine months. Mitting wrote: "With one possible exception, no threat to EN54's physical safety arising from the performance of these duties has been identified. For reasons explained in the closed note which accompanies these reasons, I am unconvinced that even the possible exception gives rise to a real risk to EN54's physical safety. The evidence which EN54 may be able to give about the discharge of his/her duties for the National Public Order Intelligence Unit islikely to attract the attention of traditional and non-traditi onal media and is likely to interfere, for a short period, with EN54's right and that of his/her family to respect for their private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention. I am not persuaded that there is any greater risk of interference by others. The risk assessor has drawn attention to the "Contrainfo" post referred to in the case of EN31 above. I do not believe that this gives rise to any greater risk to EN54 than it does EN31. I am satisfied that the need for a public official performing a significant managerial role in one of the units under specific investigation to give evidence publicly in his/her own name about the discharge of those duties justifies any interference in his/her right to respect for private and family life under Article 8(2)."<ref name="mitting.npoiu.mindedto3"/>
 |- style="vertical-align:top;"
-| EN74
+| [[EN74]]
 | ''restricted''
 | undercover
-| Mitting minded to restrict real and cover names,<ref name="cti.explan.note.2May2018"/> writing:
+| Served on other undercover work against serious and organised crime. Real and cover name restricted.
 |- style="vertical-align:top;"
 | EN287