Difference between revisions of "The Future Foundation"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This continued the work the Foundation had undertaken for Nirex over the last few years. In March 2002, the Foundation had written a report "Identifying public concerns and perceived hazards for | This continued the work the Foundation had undertaken for Nirex over the last few years. In March 2002, the Foundation had written a report "Identifying public concerns and perceived hazards for | ||
| − | the phased disposal concept, for Nirex. [http://www.nirex.co.uk/educate/395871.pdf] A month earlier they had produced "Public Attitudes to the Future Management of Radioactive Waste in the UK," and two years | + | the phased disposal concept, for Nirex. [http://www.nirex.co.uk/educate/395871.pdf] A month earlier they had produced "Public Attitudes to the Future Management of Radioactive Waste in the UK," and two years earlier "Establishing the value of wider public consultation" in November 2000. [http://www.nirex.co.uk/foi/nxconsult/] |
Revision as of 16:25, 10 January 2006
In 2003/04 the Future Foundation was paid £31,500 by Nirex to "help facilitate external events and to help draft corporate communications materials".
[Ref: D. Wild (2005) Freedom of Information Request, Letter to Jean McSorley, Senior Advisor to Greenpeace UK, 15 July]
This continued the work the Foundation had undertaken for Nirex over the last few years. In March 2002, the Foundation had written a report "Identifying public concerns and perceived hazards for the phased disposal concept, for Nirex. [1] A month earlier they had produced "Public Attitudes to the Future Management of Radioactive Waste in the UK," and two years earlier "Establishing the value of wider public consultation" in November 2000. [2]
