Difference between revisions of "Talk:Brunswick Group"
m (cut orphan references in the article and placed them here) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
--[[User:David|David]] 13:52, 22 Dec 2006 (GMT) | --[[User:David|David]] 13:52, 22 Dec 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == cut orphan references in the article and placed them here == | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===<font color="red">Orphan References</font>=== | ||
| + | #{{note|Ch}} Companies House 363s Annual Return for Brunswick Public Relations Limited, 18 June 1997. | ||
| + | #{{note|Try}} Chris Tryhorn and Owen Gibson [http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1964814,00.html PR company creates chief executive post to get Carter] The Guardian 6 December 2006. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | There is an issue with referencing in this article... | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Paul|Paulo]] | ||
Revision as of 10:57, 6 October 2007
I have added a couple of Ref? where I think this profile needs referenced - is this the level you want this referenced at? I'm a bit in the dark on this so any advice would be appreciated.
I have added as many references as I can easily find. Are some of the quotes that I cannot find from author interviews? There are large passages that appear to be from two websites (red star research and sourcewatch)- this assumes that the material was not on spinprofiles first. Any feedback?
Yes, don't use sourcewatch as a source - so if it is from them then we will need to find the original source. The other refs will need to come from a lexis nexis search. I think Will has one he could send to you.
Also can you change the referencing so that you use the same styl;e as in not 3 on the brunswick page?
eg
'quote' [1]
notes
--David 13:52, 22 Dec 2006 (GMT)
cut orphan references in the article and placed them here
Orphan References
- ^ Companies House 363s Annual Return for Brunswick Public Relations Limited, 18 June 1997.
- ^ Chris Tryhorn and Owen Gibson PR company creates chief executive post to get Carter The Guardian 6 December 2006.
There is an issue with referencing in this article...
