Roy Anderson

This article is part of the Pharma_Portal project of Spinwatch.

Professor Sir Roy Anderson is a Government advisor who sits on the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) and was brought in to ‘provide cross-government scientific advice regarding the outbreak of Swine Flu’. He was one of the first UK experts to announce the outbreak of the Swine Flu pandemic.

Anderson is also employed by GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of Swine Flu vaccines and Relenza used to treat Swine Flu. GSK pays him £116,000 a year.

Foot and mouth disease

In 2001 the UK government put Anderson in charge of charting the epidemiological progress of the foot and mouth disease outbreak. Anderson worked on the task from his office at Imperial College London. Others in his team were Dr Neil Ferguson and Dr Christl Donnelly.

It is widely accepted that the government's management of the foot and mouth outbreak, along with the scientific advice given by the government's experts, was catastrophically flawed. Millions of healthy animals were slaughtered and burned in massive funeral pyres, prompting public outrage. Much of the criticism of the government's approach hinged on its refusal to countenance a vaccination program, an approach adopted by many other countries without problems.

Vote of no confidence

In 2000 Anderson resigned from his post as Linacre professor of zoology at Oxford University and moved to Imperial College London. This occurred after an episode in 1999 when he was suspended on full pay while Oxford university authorities investigated complaints filed by his colleague Dr Sunetra Gupta. A Private Eye special report, "Not the Foot and Mouth Report" (November 2001), takes up the story:

He [Anderson] had accused her, publicly and falsely, of gaining her post at Oxford by sleeping with another professor in the zoology department. Two months later Anderson was reinstated, after agreeing to apologise in writing to those concerned. This failed to satisfy Dr Gupta, who continued to press for a public retraction. A meeting attended by 26 readers, lecturers and professors in the zoology department passed a unanimous vote of no confidence in Professor Anderson. Meanwhile, an inquiry by the university into the research centre in the zoology department criticised his "autocratic" management style: conditions at the centre were "intolerable" and divisions ran "very deep".

A separate financial audit then found that Anderson had not disclosed either to the university or the Wellcome Trust, which largely financed his research centre, that he was a director and shareholder of International Biomedical and Health Sciences Consortium, a private consultancy firm which had close financial links with the centre. As director of the Wellcome Trust Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, he had applied for over £4 million of research grants from Wellcome, while also being a Trustee of the Wellcome Trust itself, which awarded the grants. "There was a degree of naivety on his part", a Wellcome spokesman said. "He should have been aware of the procedures to be followed. The research centre was also receiving commercial grants which were not declared, in breach of the trust's regulations".

On 9 May 2000, Anderson resigned his Oxford professorship and announced that he was taking up a chair at Imperial College. A month later, he finally gave Dr Gupta the formal apology she wanted, admitting that there had been "no foundation in truth whatsoever" in his comments. He paid her legal costs plus damages of £l,000, which she donated to Save the Children. As she told the Daily Telegraph in June: "I felt nobody should be allowed to get away with this and remain in a position where they are making judgements about people's lives... I felt there was no other choice, no other way to protect myself or other people".

Anderson also resigned from his seat on the Board of Trustees for the Wellcome Trust. His departure was announced by Wellcome on 11 March 2000 in somewhat opaque terms, stating that, "in view of recent events at the University of Oxford", his resignation "would be in the best interests of both the Trust and himself".