Difference between revisions of "Powerbase:Editorial Policy"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Before contributing to SpinProfiles)
(Procedure for ensuring editorial standards)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
*On a third or further occasion, the user will be banned for a period or indefinitely.   
 
*On a third or further occasion, the user will be banned for a period or indefinitely.   
 
*The user will have the right to appeal a banning decision to the Sysop, but decisions of the Sysop are final.
 
*The user will have the right to appeal a banning decision to the Sysop, but decisions of the Sysop are final.
 
 
  
 
==Groups/individuals posting articles on themselves==
 
==Groups/individuals posting articles on themselves==

Revision as of 11:20, 20 March 2009

Template:SpinProfiles:Help

Return to SpinProfiles:Help Contents

Before contributing to SpinProfiles

Before contributing to SpinProfiles, you are required to read and understand the following pages in the Help section:

Other pages in the Help section provide guidance on specific tasks such as uploading images, etiquette, etc.

The SpinProfiles editorial process

While not all content in SpinProfiles is monitored, SpinProfiles editors do check and edit a selection of material. In many cases, articles will be edited to bring them into line with SpinProfiles policies without involving the author of an article. However, sometimes editors will contact an author via their talk page or via email with queries or issues that need to be addressed. Similarly, if an author is not following the SpinProfiles referencing, sourcing, or editorial guidelines, an editor will contact the author pointing this out.

Guidelines for authors on the editorial process

  • The aim of editors is to improve content on SpinProfiles so that it can stand as a trusted resource.
  • Editors also contribute material which is in turn edited by others. Everyone's writing benefits from having an objective eye passed over it and no one is above being edited.
  • The editor can be seen as the forerunner of the members of the public who will read SpinProfiles articles. If an editor can't understand something in an article, then there is a good chance that a member of the public will not understand it either.
  • Authors are often experts on their subject, where an editor may not be. If an editor has a problem with an aspect of an article, this could be because the author has not laid out their knowledge or made their case in a way that takes the reader with them. In such cases, the above point applies.
  • Authors are asked to briefly acknowledge or respond to editor's queries and to act on them promptly where needed. This greatly improves the efficiency of the editing process. The editor will electronically 'sign' any message left on an author's talk page; to respond, the author can click on the signature link to get to the editor's talk page.
  • Any editorial discussion should follow the rules of etiquette. The parties should treat each other with respect. The discussion should focus on the text of the article and not descend into personal criticism, judgments, or attacks.
  • Authors are welcome to discuss points raised by an editor with the editor. Editing is partly a subjective process. An author may disagree with an editor's point and feel that there is a good reason why a part of an article should be a certain way. If this is the case, please say so.
  • Often, a solution can be reached that everyone is happy with. However, any discussion of an article will result in an editorial decision. Editorial decisions are final and must be acted on.

Procedure for ensuring editorial standards

The procedure for ensuring editorial standards is as follows.

  • On the first occasion that content deemed inappropriate (in terms of potential libel, tone, accuracy, referencing, sourcing, etc), the managing editor or a sysop will discuss with the user what the problem is in an attempt to resolve it.
  • If that does not work or on a second occasion there is an issue, then the managing editor or sysop will issue a warning that particular specified edits are outside the editorial guidelines of SpinProfiles.
  • On a third or further occasion, the user will be banned for a period or indefinitely.
  • The user will have the right to appeal a banning decision to the Sysop, but decisions of the Sysop are final.

Groups/individuals posting articles on themselves

We don't encourage individuals and groups to create SpinProfiles articles about themselves or people or organizations with which they are affiliated. We encourage people who edit articles about themselves or people or organizations with which they are affiliated to exercise restraint and to defer to other contributors with regard to editing choices that are matters of interpretation rather than fact. When disputes arise over interpretation, such individuals should try to address them with comments on the talk page rather than the article space itself. Users who are overly aggressive in deleting relevant facts from articles about themselves or others may be blocked from contributing to or editing the site.

Security

Because only registered users can contribute, SpinProfiles uses a light system of security.

These measures are as follows:

  1. Some registered SpinProfiles users have been given the status of "sysop," which enables them to block contributions from registered users and to delete pages where appropriate.
  2. Sysops can also "protect" individual articles. A "protected" article can only be edited by other sysops.
  3. Any user, sysop or not, can "rollback" recent editorial changes made to an article by any other user. To "rollback" an article means to return that article to the state it was in before the previous user began editing.

Security measures should be used sparingly. Blocking should be used: a) on the first offence if commercial spam is added to one or more articles; b) where the changes are of an editorial nature, only when a user has shown a pattern of inappropriate edits such as major unexplained edits. A single inappropriate edit may be simply a mistake or a learning experiment by a new user.

Most blocks should initially be for a period of 24 hours and stepped up if vandalism is repeated. (A block on an IP address has the potential to freeze out other innocent contributors from the same IP "catchment"). Longer IP blocks may be imposed when dealing with especially egregious cases of repeated abuse.

If spam or repeated vandalism is originating from a registered user a stricter response can be adopted without adversely affecting other contributors. Where a registered user is adding spam or has repeatedly vandalised a page they can be blocked for an indefinite period by setting the block period to "indefinite" (all lower case).

Role of SpinProfiles staff

SpinProfiles is a project of Spinwatch (in partnership with Lobbywatch, Corporate Watch and others), and Spinwatch sets the policies under which SpinProfiles operates. Spinwatch editors and volunteers also contribute content to Spinprofiles and are responsible for maintaining and configuring the software on which it runs. However, Spinwatch editors do not review every article or contribution, and articles on Spinprofiles do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Spinwatch or its directors.

Resolution of disputes

SpinProfiles should not be used as a repository for content that is defamatory, obscene, or that violates copyright laws. SpinProfiles users who encounter inappropriate content are encouraged to correct it themselves. They may also notify SpinProfiles staff of problems by contacting the SpinProfiles editor by amail to management AT spinprofiles.org.

Complaints and legal threats relating to the content of a SpinProfiles page should be dealt with as a matter of high priority. Any complaints hinting at legal action are to be communicated to the Spinprofiles editors by emailing sysop AT spinprofiles.org and management AT spinprofiles.org as soon as possible. If you believe that your copyrighted material has been infringed, you may contact the editors at sysop AT spinprofiles.org and management AT spinprofiles.org.

Commentary about a SpinProfiles article should not be included in the article itself, but each article has a corresponding "talk" page where comments may be posted (accessed via the "discussion" tab at the top of the page). In cases where someone adds commentary about an article to the article itself, it should not be simply deleted. Instead, move it to the talk page.

Editorial disagreements between SpinProfiles users should focus on facts and evidence pertaining to the article(s) being edited. SpinProfiles talk pages should not be used to vent or to insult other users. Contributors who persist in a pattern of abusive or insulting behavior toward other contributors may be blocked. Contributors who repeatedly infringe copyrighted material will have their accounts terminated.

See SpinProfiles policy guides to Etiquette and Dispute Resolution for further details. Further details in relation to Copyright policy, Complaints and Legal threats are also available.

Users who violate SpinProfiles policies

Users who violate any SpinProfiles policies or guidelines should expect their contributions to be edited or deleted - either by other users, sysops or CMD staff - and security measures to be taken against them. This applies to policies and guidelines found on, but not limited to, the following pages: