Difference between revisions of "Peter Raven"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Peter Raven''' is the Director of the [http://www.mobot.org/ Missouri Botanical Garden] and a past President of the [[American Association for the Advancement of Science]]. He has been a recipient of numerous awards and honours. [http://www.time.com/time/reports/environment/heroes/heroesgallery/0,2967,raven,00.html Time magazine honoured him] for his tireless championing of conservation and biodiversity as a  'Hero for the Planet'.     
+
'''Peter Raven''' is the Director of the [[Missouri Botanical Garden]]<ref>[http://www.mobot.org/ Home Page], Missouri Botanical Garden website, accessed March 27 2009</ref> and a past President of the [[American Association for the Advancement of Science]]. He has been a recipient of numerous awards and honours. ''TIME'' magazine honoured him for his tireless championing of conservation and biodiversity as a  'Hero for the Planet'.<ref>Roger Rosenblatt, "[http://www.time.com/time/reports/environment/heroes/heroesgallery/0,2967,raven,00.html The World Is His Garden: Better Tread Carefully]", TIME.com, 19 April 1999, accessed March 27 2009</ref>    
  
Although Raven is passionately concerned about the extinction of living organisms - warning that two-thirds of the world's species may be gone by the middle of the next century, his solution to a problem brought on by carelessness and commerce, is simple - the mastery of biology allied to the power and efficiency of corporations. 'Major companies will be, are, a major factor if we are going to win world sustainability,' he [http://www.rftstl.com/issues/1999-11-03/feature.html told a journalist], and the commercial development and acceptance of GM crops is something he's convinced sustainable agriculture requires.
+
Although Raven is passionately concerned about the extinction of living organisms - warning that two-thirds of the world's species may be gone by the middle of the next century - his solution to a problem brought on by carelessness and commerce, is simple: the mastery of biology allied to the power and efficiency of corporations. "Major companies will be, are, a major factor if we are going to win world sustainability," he told a journalist,<ref>Jeannette Batz, "[http://www.rftstl.com/issues/1999-11-03/feature.html Peter and the wolf]", RFT News, 3 November 1999, accessed March 27 2009</ref> and the commercial development and acceptance of GM crops is something he's convinced sustainable agriculture requires.
  
It's an issue on which he comes out fighting. In May 2003, speaking at the Natural History Museum in London, Raven attacked Greenpeace over its opposition to GMOs, telling his audience, 'Last month, the [[Congress of Racial Equality]] (CORE), once one of America's most venerable and respected civil rights groups, confronted Greenpeace at a public event and accused it of "eco-manslaughter" through its support of international policies limiting development and the expansion of technology to the developing world's poor'. In fact, the once respected CORE  was hi-jacked during the 1970s by elements that have since  used it as a Republican right pro-corporate lobby.
+
It's an issue on which he comes out fighting. In May 2003, speaking at the Natural History Museum in London at an event sponsored by [[Sense About Science]], Raven attacked Greenpeace over its opposition to GMOs, telling his audience:
 +
:Last month, the [[Congress of Racial Equality]] (CORE), once one of America's most venerable and respected civil rights groups, confronted Greenpeace at a public event and accused it of "'eco-manslaughter' through its support of international policies limiting development and the expansion of technology to the developing world's poor".<ref>Peter H. Raven, "[http://www.biotech-info.net/environmental_challenge.html The Environmental Challenge]", Talk presented at the Natural History Museum, London, England, 22 May 2003, sponsored by Sense about Science, accessed March 27 2009</ref>
  
If Raven is hard on Greenpeace, he's less critical when it comes to Monsanto. 'There is nothing I'm condemning Monsanto for,' [http://www.rftstl.com/issues/1999-11-03/feature.html he says]. And he's [http://ngin.tripod.com/130502a.htm praised] the company's efforts to win public acceptance for GMOs, 'The company has . . . won many more believers around the world in what they're doing and attempting to do.
+
In fact, the once-respected CORE was hijacked during the 1970s by elements that have since used it as a Republican right pro-corporate lobby.
  
An old friend of Raven's, geneticist [http://www.rftstl.com/issues/1999-11-03/feature.html Wes Jackson], says of him, 'I just wish Peter was more reflective... The fact that living substance, germplasm, can become the property of a corporation is going to come at a cost. I think the boundaries of consideration need to be broader than Peter's willing to make them. '''In a certain sense he's a paid traveling salesman for Monsanto''' .'
+
If Raven is hard on Greenpeace, he's less critical when it comes to Monsanto. "There is nothing I'm condemning Monsanto for,"<ref>Jeannette Batz, "[http://www.rftstl.com/issues/1999-11-03/feature.html Peter and the wolf]", RFT News, 3 November 1999, accessed March 27 2009</ref> he says. And he has [http://ngin.tripod.com/130502a.htm praised] the company's efforts to win public acceptance for GMOs: 'The company has ... won many more believers around the world in what they're doing and attempting to do.'  
  
Raven has good reason to smile on the company. [http://www.time.com/time/reports/environment/heroes/heroesgallery/0,2967,raven3,00.html According to Time magazine], 'When Raven first came to the garden in 1971, he had 85 employees and a budget of $650,000. Today there are 354 people on staff, and the budget is $20 million.' That expansion has been assisted by millions from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and substantial corporate support, not least from Monsanto.             
+
An old friend of Raven's, geneticist [[Wes Jackson]], says of him:
 +
:I just wish Peter was more reflective... The fact that living substance, germplasm, can become the property of a corporation is going to come at a cost. I think the boundaries of consideration need to be broader than Peter's willing to make them. '''In a certain sense he's a paid traveling salesman for Monsanto''' .<ref>Jeannette Batz, "[http://www.rftstl.com/issues/1999-11-03/feature.html Peter and the wolf]", RFT News, 3 November 1999, accessed March 27 2009 (GMWatch's emphasis)</ref>
 +
 
 +
Raven has good reason to smile on the company. According to ''TIME'' magazine:
 +
:When Raven first came to the garden in 1971, he had 85 employees and a budget of $650,000. Today there are 354 people on staff, and the budget is $20 million.<ref>Roger Rosenblatt, "[http://www.time.com/time/reports/environment/heroes/heroesgallery/0,2967,raven,00.html The World Is His Garden: Better Tread Carefully]", TIME.com, 19 April 1999, accessed March 27 2009</ref> That expansion has been assisted by millions from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and substantial corporate support, not least from Monsanto.             
  
 
The Garden, in fact, is based in Monsanto's home town of St. Louis. According to Raven there are other reasons for the strength of Monsanto's support.  Although, 'we don't do biotech work other than bioprospecting', he says, 'The basic research we do here at the Garden makes us a major resource for the biotechnology industry'. Raven, together with Monsanto, was also the driving force behind a nearby plant biotech research institute on whose board he sits.   
 
The Garden, in fact, is based in Monsanto's home town of St. Louis. According to Raven there are other reasons for the strength of Monsanto's support.  Although, 'we don't do biotech work other than bioprospecting', he says, 'The basic research we do here at the Garden makes us a major resource for the biotechnology industry'. Raven, together with Monsanto, was also the driving force behind a nearby plant biotech research institute on whose board he sits.   
  
The Raven-Monsanto equation includes the Garden's  multimillion-dollar research centre - The [http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/monsanto/ Monsanto Center]. And it doesn't stop there as the St Louis' paper, The Riverside Times, noted in 1999, 'The Garden received $3 million from Monsanto in their last fundraising campaign... Monsanto also contributed land and a large chunk of the $146 million startup money for the Danforth Plant Science Center [a project Raven was instrumental in getting off the ground]. Monsanto matches its employees' contributions to the Garden ($225,000 last year) and contributes to the operating fund ($25,000 last year). Trustees give privately, too, and in past years the Garden has had Monsanto CEO Robert Shapiro, Monsanto vice president Tom K. Smith and Monsanto research-and-development director Howard Schneiderman on its governing board. Now the Garden is collaborating with Monsanto's nutrition sector on a food library, collecting samples of all plants used worldwide as foods and medicines. (The World Resources Institute lists Monsanto as a bioprospector since 1989 and lists its collector, as of 1993, as the Missouri Botanical Garden.) When Confluence, an environmental quarterly, criticized Monsanto, the Garden's PR woman pulled it from their literature table.'  
+
The Raven-Monsanto equation includes the Garden's  multimillion-dollar research centre - The [[Monsanto Center]].<ref>"[http://www.mobot.org/hort/tours/bldgstour.shtml#garden9 Monsanto Center]", Missouri Botanical Garden website, accessed March 27 2009</ref> And it doesn't stop there. As the St Louis' paper, the ''Riverside Times'', noted in 1999:
 +
:The Garden received $3 million from Monsanto in their last fundraising campaign... Monsanto also contributed land and a large chunk of the $146 million startup money for the Danforth Plant Science Center [a project Raven was instrumental in getting off the ground]. Monsanto matches its employees' contributions to the Garden ($225,000 last year) and contributes to the operating fund ($25,000 last year). Trustees give privately, too, and in past years the Garden has had Monsanto CEO Robert Shapiro, Monsanto vice president Tom K. Smith and Monsanto research-and-development director Howard Schneiderman on its governing board. Now the Garden is collaborating with Monsanto's nutrition sector on a food library, collecting samples of all plants used worldwide as foods and medicines. (The World Resources Institute lists Monsanto as a bioprospector since 1989 and lists its collector, as of 1993, as the Missouri Botanical Garden.) When Confluence, an environmental quarterly, criticized Monsanto, the Garden's PR woman pulled it from their literature table.<ref>Jeannette Batz, "[http://www.rftstl.com/issues/1999-11-03/feature.html Peter and the wolf]", RFT News, 3 November 1999, accessed March 27 2009</ref>   
 +
 
 +
At the time that was written, Raven's wife was Monsanto's Director of Public Policy, [[Kate Fish]], leading to jokes that even Raven's sex life came corporate-sponsored.
  
At the time that was written, Raven's wife was Monsanto's Director of Public Policy, Kate Fish, leading to jokes that even  Raven's sex life came corporate-sponsored.  
+
Raven played a key role in getting the Golden Rice publicity bandwagon rolling, after its inventor [[Ingo Potrykus]] had his paper publicising the project rejected by the journal ''Nature''.  
  
Raven played a key role in getting the Golden Rice publicity bandwagon rolling, after its inventor [[Ingo Potrykus]] had his paper publicising the project rejected by the journal Nature.  
+
Raven is a key member of the Vatican's Pontifical Academy of Sciences and was among the invited speakers at a special Vatican study seminar held in November 2003 entitled "GMO: Threat or Hope?"<ref>Jeffrey L. Fox, "[http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v22/n1/full/nbt0104-4.html Vatican debates agbiotech]", Nature Biotechnology 22, 4-5 (2004), doi:10.1038/nbt0104-4</ref>. The seminar came under criticism from African priests for bias.<ref>Philip Pullella, "[http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L11627744.htm African priests criticise Vatican GMO conference]", Reuters, 11 November 2003, accessed March 27 2009</ref>
  
Raven is a Member of the Vatican's Pontifical Academy of Sciences and was among [http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=1657 the invited speakers] at a special Vatican study seminar held in November 2003 entitled GMO:  THREAT OR HOPE?. The seminar came under attack for bias. ([http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L11627744.htm African priests criticise Vatican GMO conference])
+
According to [[David Andrew]], former Executive Director of the [[National Catholic Rural Life Conference]] and the Peace and Justice Coordinator for the Congregation of Holy Cross:
 +
:At the time of the conference I spoke with Archbishop Raymond Burke, then the Archbishop of Saint Louis and a strong critic of biotechnology and corporate control in agriculture. He had been the President of the National Catholic Rural Life Conference. He told me that shortly after he arrived in Saint Louis he met Peter Raven at a social event. Raven approached him and said: "Archbishop, I understand that you are opposed to GMOs." The Archbishop told him, that, yes, he was. And, Raven answered: "I'm going to convert you."<ref>David Andrews, CSC, "[http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Pontifical-Academy-of-by-David-Andrews-CSC-090219-397.html The Pontifical Academy of Sciences Continues Foolhardy Biotechnology Advocacy]", Op-Ed News, 29 January 2009, accessed March 27 2009. Also available via [http://tiny.cc/jmVmM Tiny Url]</ref>
  
According to David Andrew, former Executive Director of the National Catholic Rural Life Conference and the Peace and Justice Coordinator for the Congregation of Holy Cross, "At the time of the conference I spoke with Archbishop Raymond Burke, then the Archbishop of Saint Louis and a strong critic of biotechnology and corporate control in agriculture. He had been the President of the National Catholic Rural Life Conference. He told me that shortly after he arrived in Saint Louis he met Peter Raven at a social event. Raven approached him and said: 'Archbishop, I understand that you are opposed to gmos.' The Archbishop told him, that, yes, he was. And, Raven answered: 'I'm going to convert you.'"
+
Andrew also notes:
 +
:Peter Raven, when speaking at a conference of the National Religious Partnership on the Environment that I attended, introduced himself as having a "Catholic background." At that time he was accompanied by his fourth wife, just having divorced his third wife, who had a position as a public relations director for Monsanto. The Catholic "background" doesn't include the "family values" of the Holy See. But, Peter Raven has been finding it easy to give voice to his ideas within selected walls of the Vatican.<ref>David Andrews, CSC, "[http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Pontifical-Academy-of-by-David-Andrews-CSC-090219-397.html The Pontifical Academy of Sciences Continues Foolhardy Biotechnology Advocacy]", Op-Ed News, 29 January 2009, accessed March 27 2009. Also available via [http://tiny.cc/jmVmM Tiny Url]</ref>
  
Andrew also notes, "Peter Raven, when speaking at a conference of the National Religious Partnership on the Environment that I attended, introduced himself as having a "Catholic background." At that time he was accompanied by his fourth wife, just having divorced his third wife, who had a position as a public relations director for Monsanto. The Catholic "background" doesn't include the "family values" of the Holy See. But, Peter Raven has been finding it easy to give voice to his ideas within selected walls of the Vatican." ([http://tiny.cc/jmVmM The Pontifical Academy of Sciences continues foolhardy biotechnology advocacy])
+
He was also involved in a still more controversial week-long study week organised by the Pontifical Academy for May 2009.<ref>"[http://www.gmwatch.eu/archives/51-Latest-pro-GM-conference-at-Vatican.html Transgenic Plants for Food Security in the Context of Development]", 15-19 May 2009 - Casina Pio IV, Vatican City</ref><ref>Fr. Seán McDonagh, "[http://www.gmwatch.eu/archives/51-Latest-pro-GM-conference-at-Vatican.html Further reflections on the GMO Conference in the Gregorian University in September 2004]", 14 January 2009, accessed March 27 2009</ref>
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
[[Category:GM|Raven, Peter]]
+
[[Category:GM|Raven, Peter]][[Category:Corporate Science (GM)|Raven, Peter]][[Category:Third World Lobbyists (GM)|Raven, Peter]]

Latest revision as of 17:25, 27 March 2009

Peter Raven is the Director of the Missouri Botanical Garden[1] and a past President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He has been a recipient of numerous awards and honours. TIME magazine honoured him for his tireless championing of conservation and biodiversity as a 'Hero for the Planet'.[2]

Although Raven is passionately concerned about the extinction of living organisms - warning that two-thirds of the world's species may be gone by the middle of the next century - his solution to a problem brought on by carelessness and commerce, is simple: the mastery of biology allied to the power and efficiency of corporations. "Major companies will be, are, a major factor if we are going to win world sustainability," he told a journalist,[3] and the commercial development and acceptance of GM crops is something he's convinced sustainable agriculture requires.

It's an issue on which he comes out fighting. In May 2003, speaking at the Natural History Museum in London at an event sponsored by Sense About Science, Raven attacked Greenpeace over its opposition to GMOs, telling his audience:

Last month, the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), once one of America's most venerable and respected civil rights groups, confronted Greenpeace at a public event and accused it of "'eco-manslaughter' through its support of international policies limiting development and the expansion of technology to the developing world's poor".[4]

In fact, the once-respected CORE was hijacked during the 1970s by elements that have since used it as a Republican right pro-corporate lobby.

If Raven is hard on Greenpeace, he's less critical when it comes to Monsanto. "There is nothing I'm condemning Monsanto for,"[5] he says. And he has praised the company's efforts to win public acceptance for GMOs: 'The company has ... won many more believers around the world in what they're doing and attempting to do.'

An old friend of Raven's, geneticist Wes Jackson, says of him:

I just wish Peter was more reflective... The fact that living substance, germplasm, can become the property of a corporation is going to come at a cost. I think the boundaries of consideration need to be broader than Peter's willing to make them. In a certain sense he's a paid traveling salesman for Monsanto .[6]

Raven has good reason to smile on the company. According to TIME magazine:

When Raven first came to the garden in 1971, he had 85 employees and a budget of $650,000. Today there are 354 people on staff, and the budget is $20 million.[7] That expansion has been assisted by millions from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and substantial corporate support, not least from Monsanto.

The Garden, in fact, is based in Monsanto's home town of St. Louis. According to Raven there are other reasons for the strength of Monsanto's support. Although, 'we don't do biotech work other than bioprospecting', he says, 'The basic research we do here at the Garden makes us a major resource for the biotechnology industry'. Raven, together with Monsanto, was also the driving force behind a nearby plant biotech research institute on whose board he sits.

The Raven-Monsanto equation includes the Garden's multimillion-dollar research centre - The Monsanto Center.[8] And it doesn't stop there. As the St Louis' paper, the Riverside Times, noted in 1999:

The Garden received $3 million from Monsanto in their last fundraising campaign... Monsanto also contributed land and a large chunk of the $146 million startup money for the Danforth Plant Science Center [a project Raven was instrumental in getting off the ground]. Monsanto matches its employees' contributions to the Garden ($225,000 last year) and contributes to the operating fund ($25,000 last year). Trustees give privately, too, and in past years the Garden has had Monsanto CEO Robert Shapiro, Monsanto vice president Tom K. Smith and Monsanto research-and-development director Howard Schneiderman on its governing board. Now the Garden is collaborating with Monsanto's nutrition sector on a food library, collecting samples of all plants used worldwide as foods and medicines. (The World Resources Institute lists Monsanto as a bioprospector since 1989 and lists its collector, as of 1993, as the Missouri Botanical Garden.) When Confluence, an environmental quarterly, criticized Monsanto, the Garden's PR woman pulled it from their literature table.[9]

At the time that was written, Raven's wife was Monsanto's Director of Public Policy, Kate Fish, leading to jokes that even Raven's sex life came corporate-sponsored.

Raven played a key role in getting the Golden Rice publicity bandwagon rolling, after its inventor Ingo Potrykus had his paper publicising the project rejected by the journal Nature.

Raven is a key member of the Vatican's Pontifical Academy of Sciences and was among the invited speakers at a special Vatican study seminar held in November 2003 entitled "GMO: Threat or Hope?"[10]. The seminar came under criticism from African priests for bias.[11]

According to David Andrew, former Executive Director of the National Catholic Rural Life Conference and the Peace and Justice Coordinator for the Congregation of Holy Cross:

At the time of the conference I spoke with Archbishop Raymond Burke, then the Archbishop of Saint Louis and a strong critic of biotechnology and corporate control in agriculture. He had been the President of the National Catholic Rural Life Conference. He told me that shortly after he arrived in Saint Louis he met Peter Raven at a social event. Raven approached him and said: "Archbishop, I understand that you are opposed to GMOs." The Archbishop told him, that, yes, he was. And, Raven answered: "I'm going to convert you."[12]

Andrew also notes:

Peter Raven, when speaking at a conference of the National Religious Partnership on the Environment that I attended, introduced himself as having a "Catholic background." At that time he was accompanied by his fourth wife, just having divorced his third wife, who had a position as a public relations director for Monsanto. The Catholic "background" doesn't include the "family values" of the Holy See. But, Peter Raven has been finding it easy to give voice to his ideas within selected walls of the Vatican.[13]

He was also involved in a still more controversial week-long study week organised by the Pontifical Academy for May 2009.[14][15]

Notes

  1. Home Page, Missouri Botanical Garden website, accessed March 27 2009
  2. Roger Rosenblatt, "The World Is His Garden: Better Tread Carefully", TIME.com, 19 April 1999, accessed March 27 2009
  3. Jeannette Batz, "Peter and the wolf", RFT News, 3 November 1999, accessed March 27 2009
  4. Peter H. Raven, "The Environmental Challenge", Talk presented at the Natural History Museum, London, England, 22 May 2003, sponsored by Sense about Science, accessed March 27 2009
  5. Jeannette Batz, "Peter and the wolf", RFT News, 3 November 1999, accessed March 27 2009
  6. Jeannette Batz, "Peter and the wolf", RFT News, 3 November 1999, accessed March 27 2009 (GMWatch's emphasis)
  7. Roger Rosenblatt, "The World Is His Garden: Better Tread Carefully", TIME.com, 19 April 1999, accessed March 27 2009
  8. "Monsanto Center", Missouri Botanical Garden website, accessed March 27 2009
  9. Jeannette Batz, "Peter and the wolf", RFT News, 3 November 1999, accessed March 27 2009
  10. Jeffrey L. Fox, "Vatican debates agbiotech", Nature Biotechnology 22, 4-5 (2004), doi:10.1038/nbt0104-4
  11. Philip Pullella, "African priests criticise Vatican GMO conference", Reuters, 11 November 2003, accessed March 27 2009
  12. David Andrews, CSC, "The Pontifical Academy of Sciences Continues Foolhardy Biotechnology Advocacy", Op-Ed News, 29 January 2009, accessed March 27 2009. Also available via Tiny Url
  13. David Andrews, CSC, "The Pontifical Academy of Sciences Continues Foolhardy Biotechnology Advocacy", Op-Ed News, 29 January 2009, accessed March 27 2009. Also available via Tiny Url
  14. "Transgenic Plants for Food Security in the Context of Development", 15-19 May 2009 - Casina Pio IV, Vatican City
  15. Fr. Seán McDonagh, "Further reflections on the GMO Conference in the Gregorian University in September 2004", 14 January 2009, accessed March 27 2009