Difference between revisions of "Nuclear spin"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Individuals)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<table border="0" cellpadding="5">
 +
  <tr valign="top">
 +
    <td width="60%"><p align="left"><B>Welcome to NuclearSpin</B></p>
  
'''Welcome to the Nuclearspin website'''.
+
==The Covert Pro-Nuclear Push in Schools==
  
== Background Information on Nuclear Spin ==
+
As the British Government announces the go-ahead for a new generation of nuclear power plants in the UK, Nuclear Spin reveals the pro-nuclear covert campaign underway in British schools.
  
* [[What is Nuclear Spin?]]
+
For example, in 2006, the national curriculum was changed so that it became compulsory for schools to teach all 14-16 year olds about nuclear power. The move was largely sparked by a report for the Department for Trade and Industry written by the Nuclear Skills Group, made up of Government officials and a panel of six ‘independent members’. In the report only one, Paul Thomas, was said to be working for BNFL. But NuclearSpin has discovered that two more members were also working for BNFL.
  
* [[Who funds Nuclear Spin?]]
+
One of the nuclear industry’s largest education projects is called Energy Foresight, run by Young Foresight, which in turn has been paid hundreds of thousands of pounds by nuclear organisations to develop a set of teaching materials “that present radioactivity and related issues in personal and social contexts.” Energy Foresight’s material’s have been criticized by independent nuclear consultant John Large as “a blatant piece of propaganda… it misleads”.
  
* [[Getting Involved]]
+
For more on this go [[http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php/The_Secret_Pro-Nuclear_Push_In_Schools here]].
  
* [[A Guide to Referencing]]
+
== Background ==
  
==Individuals==
+
NuclearSpin was originally launched in response to the British Government’s 12-week consultation on energy in 2006. In 2007, the High Court ruled that the Government’s plans to build a new generation of nuclear power stations were “unlawful” and the way it consulted with the public over the decision was “misleading, seriously flawed, manifestly inadequate and procedurally unfair”. 
 +
[http://www.guardian.co.uk/nuclear/article/0,,2013618,00.html]
 +
[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6364281.stm]
  
*Lord [[John Birt]] - Blair's ex-advisor
+
What makes Brown's decision in January 2008 to give the goahead to a new generation of nuclear plants politically sensitive is that his younger brother Andrew Brown works for [[EDF Energy]], the UK subsidiary of [[EDF]], which is one of the leading companies pushing for a nuclear rebuild programme in the UK.
* [[Tony Blair]] and [[The Cabinet]]
 
* [[Gregg Butler]] - A consultant still paid by [[BNFL]]
 
* [[Yvette Cooper]] The Minister with a nuclear family
 
* [[Jack Cunningham]] - "Nuclear" Jack
 
* [[Roger Ewart-Smith]] - The pro-nuclear banker
 
* [[Alistair Darling]]
 
* [[Philip Dewhurst]] - A key nuclear spin doctor
 
* [[Thomas Docherty]] - Long-term nuclear lobbyist with political ambitions
 
* [[Ian Fells]] - The Government advisor whose credibility has been questioned
 
* [[Dieter Helm]] - An influential advisor who questions renewables
 
* [[John Hutton]] - Work and Pensions Secretary 
 
* [[Bernard Ingham]] - A long-standing pro-nuke and anti-wind campaigner
 
* [[Sue Ion]] - BNFL and BNES
 
* [[Lord Jenkin]] - Long-term nuclear supporter
 
* [[Alan Johnson]] - Government Minister - whose side of the fence is he on?
 
*[[David King]] - The government's chief scientist who sees nukes as the answer to climate change
 
*[[James Lovelock]] - The pro-nuke green guru
 
* [[Joan MacNaughton]]
 
* [[Robert May]] - Ex-head of the Royal Society
 
* [[David Miliband]]  - New Environment Secretary
 
*[[Jack McConnell]] - Scottish First Minister - likely to toe the political line.
 
*[[Grace McGlynn]]  - A Pro-Nuke Consultant
 
* [[Sir Donald Miller]] - Ex-Scottish Power - Anti-wind and pro-Nuke
 
* [[David Mundell]] - The MP fighting at Westminster for nukes in Scotland
 
* [[Elaine Murray]] - The MSP fighting for nukes at Holyrood
 
*[[Geoffrey Norris]] - a key special advisor to [[Tony Blair]]
 
*[[Keith Parker]] - the ex-civil servant who saw the general election as an "opportunity"
 
* [[Jamie Reed]] - the former [[BNFL]] press officer who is now an MP
 
* [[Willy Rickett]] - Director General of the DTI's Energy Group
 
* Professor [[Philip Thomas]] - From City University - but how independent?
 
* Lord [[David Sainsbury]]
 
* [[Malcolm Wicks]] - The Energy Minister
 
*[[Brian Wilson]] - ex-Energy Minister who now works for the nuclear industry
 
*[[Lisa Woolhouse]]- the so-called "independent advisor"
 
* [[Terry Wynn]] - Pro-Nuclear MEP
 
  
==The Media==
+
The Labour Government is also speeding up the planning process, making it easier for nuclear power plants to be built. Planning Minister, [[Yvette Cooper]] has already had to fight off criticism of "nuclear cronyism" due to her father's links to the nuclear industry too.
  
[[How the Different Newspapers Stack Up]]
+
To help people make up their own mind about nuclear power, NuclearSpin has been updated and expanded.
  
==Individual Columnists==
+
* There are new sections on countries and regions, including [[Australia]], [[Belgium]], [[Canada]], the [[EU]], [[Finland]], [[France]], [[Germany]], [[Japan]], [[United Kingdom]] and [[United States]];
  
*[[Simon Jenkins]]
+
Within these sections you will find details on the lobby groups and pronuclear MEPs in Brussels, including British MEP [[John Purvis]], who is a director of a company with significant investments in nuclear.
*[[Jason Nisse]]
 
*[[Max Hastings]]
 
  
==Organisations==
+
You can read about the Italian company, [[Enel]], still 30% owned by the Italian Government, (in a country which voted to close down its reactors in 1987) which is now trying to build new nuclear reactors in Slovakia. Or find out how German companies are trying to undermine the nuclear phase out agreement.
  
* [[All-Party Parliamentary Group on Nuclear Energy]]
+
Or find out more information on companies like [[Iberdrola]], which has recently taken over Scottish Power and likes to present itself as a renewable energy company.
*[[British Nuclear Energy Society]]
 
* [[Cross Party Group on the Civil Nuclear Industry]]
 
* [[The Committee on Radioactive Waste Management]]
 
*[[Department of Trade and Industry]]
 
*[[Energy Industries Club]]
 
*[[Energy Institute]]
 
*[[Energy Research Partnership]]
 
* [[European Atomic Forum]] (FORATOM)
 
* [[Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy]] at the European Parliament
 
* [[The Institution of Civil Engineers]]
 
*[[Nirex]]
 
*[[Nuclear Decommissioning Authority]]
 
*[[Nuclear Industry Association]] 
 
*[[Royal Institute of International Affairs]]
 
* [[The Royal Academy of Engineering]]
 
*[[Royal Society ]]
 
*[[Supporters of Nuclear Energy]]
 
*[[Transatlantic Nuclear Energy Forum]]
 
*[[United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority]]
 
* [[World Nuclear Association]]
 
  
==Companies==
+
Find out how French Government-owned [[EDF]] is expanding its pro-nuclear tentacles around the globe, and [[Vattenfall]] – wholly owned by the Swedish State, which is meant to be phasing out nuclear power – is heavily involved in the industry battle to undermine Germany’s phase-out of nuclear power.
  
*[[AMEC]]
+
* Hugely expanded profiles on pro-nuclear organisations and lobby groups.  
* [[Areva]]
 
*[[British Nuclear Fuels Limited]] - holding company for [[British Nuclear Group]], [[Nexia Solutions]] and [[Westinghouse]]. It also has a US subsidiary:
 
*[[British Energy]]
 
* [[EDF]] whose Head of Press in the UK is Chancellor [[Gordon Brown]]'s younger brother
 
* [[Eon]]
 
* [[General Electric]]
 
* [[RWE]]
 
  
==PR, Lobbying and Consultancy firms==
+
Some of these are out to confuse you with “eco”-sounding names such as the [[African American Environmentalist Association]] and the [[Clean and Safe Energy Coalition]]. 
  
*[[Bell Pottinger]]
+
Or learn how some of these groups such as the [[Nuclear Energy Institute]] ghost opinion pieces for local academics to sign and publish in regional newspapers across the country.
*[[Facilitating Change Limited]]
 
*[[Financial Dynamics]]
 
*[[Fleishman Hillard]] - need to add scottish Nirex stuff to their profile although it is not linking back to nirex
 
*[[ForthRoad Limited]]
 
*[[The Future Foundation]]
 
*[[Good Relations]]
 
*[[Grayling Political Strategy]]
 
*[[Integrated Decision Management]]
 
*[[International Futures Forum]] - [[Praxis]]
 
*[[Kingsmead Communications Limited]]
 
*[[Luther Pendragon]]
 
*[[PR21]] now known as [[Zeno]]
 
*[[Promise PR]]
 
*[[Strategic Awareness]]
 
*[[Weber Shandwick]]
 
  
==City Firms==
+
* A new Analysis section, including “Why [[Nuclear is not the Answer to Climate Change]].”
  
* [[Rothschild]]
+
* New Freedom of Information requests in key areas on the nuclear push in schools, the [[Franco-British Nuclear Forum]], the "intimate" relationship between [[Jamie Reed]] MP and [[BNFL]], and secret meetings between Number 10’s advisor, [[Geoffrey Norris]] and the World Nuclear Association.
  
==Unions==
+
We hope you will find the site useful and informative. We think you will discover that a better understanding of what is going on globally will help you understand what pro-nuclear spin doctors are up to in your country.
  
* [[nUKlear21]]
+
    </td>
* [[Amicus]]
+
    <td width="1%"></td>
* [[GMB]]
+
    <td width="39%" valign="top">
* [[Prospect]]
+
==NuclearSpin Categories==
* [[TGWU]]
 
* [[TUC]]
 
* [[UCATT]]
 
  
==Web Companies==
+
*[http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php?title=Category:Analysis'''Analysis''']
 +
*[http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php?title=Category:Individuals_linked_to_the_push_for_nuclear&rcid=12559 '''Individuals''']
 +
*[http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php/Category:Pro-nuclear_organisations '''Organisations''']
 +
*[http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php/Category:Countries '''Countries''']
 +
*[http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php/Category:Civil_nuclear_industry '''Companies''']
 +
*[http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php/Category:Nuclear_PR%2C_lobbying_and_consultancy_firms  '''PR, Lobbying and Consultancy firms''']
  
* [[Sticky New Media]] - Web Design Company
+
==NuclearSpin in the News==
* [[Activate Media]]   
+
 
* [[Forepoint]]
+
So far NuclearSpin or documents from the website have been covered in/on:
 +
*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/nuclear/article/0,,1765925,00.html ''The Guardian''], May 03, 2006;
 +
*[http://society.guardian.co.uk/societyguardian/story/0,,1781217,00.html ''The Guardian''], May 24, 2006;
 +
*[http://society.guardian.co.uk/societyguardian/story/0,,1791354,00.html ''The Guardian''], June 7, 2006;
 +
*[http://www.robedwards.info/2006/05/from_sunday_her.html#more ''The Sunday Herald'']; May 14, 2006;
 +
*[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2090-2169217.html ''The Sunday Times'']; May 7, 2006;
 +
*[http://venus.opendemocracy.net/t/2959/74001/1791/0/ Open Democracy]; May 18, 2006;
 +
*BBC Newsnight Scotland, May 17 2006;
 +
*[[Private Eye on Nuclear Spin|Private Eye]], No. 1159, 26 May - 8 June 2006
 +
*[http://www.whitehaven-news.co.uk/unknown/viewarticle.aspx?id=378571 W''hiteHaven News''], June 22, 2006.
 +
* BBC Newsnight, July 5, 2006.
 +
* [http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0607/S00076.htm ''Scoop''], July 7, 2006.  
 +
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5149676.stm BBC News Online], July 10, 2006.
 +
* [http://politics.guardian.co.uk/green/comment/0,,1817583,00.html ''The Guardian''] July 11, 2006.
 +
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/nuclear/article/0,,1820515,00.html ''The Guardian''], July 17, 2006.
 +
* [http://www.publicaffairsnews.com/ ''Public Affairs News''], October, 2006
 +
* [http://fanonite.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/the-friendly-atom/ ''Variant''], Number 28, Spring 2007
 +
 
 +
==What's New==
 +
 
 +
Nuclear power is the least popular energy source among European Union citizens, according to new research. A special report from [http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm Eurobarometer], the public opinion analysis arm of the European Commission, concludes that “EU citizens are most in favour of renewable energy sources while nuclear energy is opposed by many”. Of 24,815 EU citizens interviewed in 25 countries, only one in five said they were in favour of nuclear power, while one in three (39 per cent) expressed strong opposition. The report says: “Nuclear energy provokes the most opposition among EU citizens." To read more, click [http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_262_en.pdf here] (pdf file).
 +
 
 +
The [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/e2532608-bf72-11db-9ac2-000b5df10621.html ''Financial Times''] reported on February 19, 2007, that Rolf Linkohr, who has been advising Andris Piebalgs, the European energy commissioner, had his contract terminated because he failed to clarify there was no conflict of interest between this role, and his role as a pro-nuclear lobbyist. The sacking came after a campaign by [http://www.corporateeurope.org/ Corporate Europe Observatory].
 +
 
 +
Check out the new video section on SpinWatch including one on the dangers of civil nuclear power featuring David Lochbaum from the [http://www.spinwatch.org/content/view/3547/67/ Union of Concerned Scientists].
 +
 
 +
Also a coalition of groups in the US called Grass Roots Action Center for the Environment (GRACE) has launched a report called [http://www.graceenergyinitiative.org/download/FalsePromises.pdf ''False Promises: Debunking Nuclear Industry Propaganda''] this is a compelling exposé of the nuclear industry propaganda.
 +
 +
'''Other Nuke News'''
 +
 
 +
'''Get the latest news''' on the Nuclear push at the Spinwatch [http://www.spinwatch.org/content/category/5/152/9/ site]</td>
 +
<td width="10"></tr>
 +
</table>

Revision as of 07:48, 15 January 2008

Welcome to NuclearSpin

The Covert Pro-Nuclear Push in Schools

As the British Government announces the go-ahead for a new generation of nuclear power plants in the UK, Nuclear Spin reveals the pro-nuclear covert campaign underway in British schools.

For example, in 2006, the national curriculum was changed so that it became compulsory for schools to teach all 14-16 year olds about nuclear power. The move was largely sparked by a report for the Department for Trade and Industry written by the Nuclear Skills Group, made up of Government officials and a panel of six ‘independent members’. In the report only one, Paul Thomas, was said to be working for BNFL. But NuclearSpin has discovered that two more members were also working for BNFL.

One of the nuclear industry’s largest education projects is called Energy Foresight, run by Young Foresight, which in turn has been paid hundreds of thousands of pounds by nuclear organisations to develop a set of teaching materials “that present radioactivity and related issues in personal and social contexts.” Energy Foresight’s material’s have been criticized by independent nuclear consultant John Large as “a blatant piece of propaganda… it misleads”.

For more on this go [here].

Background

NuclearSpin was originally launched in response to the British Government’s 12-week consultation on energy in 2006. In 2007, the High Court ruled that the Government’s plans to build a new generation of nuclear power stations were “unlawful” and the way it consulted with the public over the decision was “misleading, seriously flawed, manifestly inadequate and procedurally unfair”. [1] [2]

What makes Brown's decision in January 2008 to give the goahead to a new generation of nuclear plants politically sensitive is that his younger brother Andrew Brown works for EDF Energy, the UK subsidiary of EDF, which is one of the leading companies pushing for a nuclear rebuild programme in the UK.

The Labour Government is also speeding up the planning process, making it easier for nuclear power plants to be built. Planning Minister, Yvette Cooper has already had to fight off criticism of "nuclear cronyism" due to her father's links to the nuclear industry too.

To help people make up their own mind about nuclear power, NuclearSpin has been updated and expanded.

Within these sections you will find details on the lobby groups and pronuclear MEPs in Brussels, including British MEP John Purvis, who is a director of a company with significant investments in nuclear.

You can read about the Italian company, Enel, still 30% owned by the Italian Government, (in a country which voted to close down its reactors in 1987) which is now trying to build new nuclear reactors in Slovakia. Or find out how German companies are trying to undermine the nuclear phase out agreement.

Or find out more information on companies like Iberdrola, which has recently taken over Scottish Power and likes to present itself as a renewable energy company.

Find out how French Government-owned EDF is expanding its pro-nuclear tentacles around the globe, and Vattenfall – wholly owned by the Swedish State, which is meant to be phasing out nuclear power – is heavily involved in the industry battle to undermine Germany’s phase-out of nuclear power.

  • Hugely expanded profiles on pro-nuclear organisations and lobby groups.

Some of these are out to confuse you with “eco”-sounding names such as the African American Environmentalist Association and the Clean and Safe Energy Coalition.

Or learn how some of these groups such as the Nuclear Energy Institute ghost opinion pieces for local academics to sign and publish in regional newspapers across the country.

We hope you will find the site useful and informative. We think you will discover that a better understanding of what is going on globally will help you understand what pro-nuclear spin doctors are up to in your country.

NuclearSpin Categories

NuclearSpin in the News

So far NuclearSpin or documents from the website have been covered in/on:

What's New

Nuclear power is the least popular energy source among European Union citizens, according to new research. A special report from Eurobarometer, the public opinion analysis arm of the European Commission, concludes that “EU citizens are most in favour of renewable energy sources while nuclear energy is opposed by many”. Of 24,815 EU citizens interviewed in 25 countries, only one in five said they were in favour of nuclear power, while one in three (39 per cent) expressed strong opposition. The report says: “Nuclear energy provokes the most opposition among EU citizens." To read more, click here (pdf file).

The Financial Times reported on February 19, 2007, that Rolf Linkohr, who has been advising Andris Piebalgs, the European energy commissioner, had his contract terminated because he failed to clarify there was no conflict of interest between this role, and his role as a pro-nuclear lobbyist. The sacking came after a campaign by Corporate Europe Observatory.

Check out the new video section on SpinWatch including one on the dangers of civil nuclear power featuring David Lochbaum from the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Also a coalition of groups in the US called Grass Roots Action Center for the Environment (GRACE) has launched a report called False Promises: Debunking Nuclear Industry Propaganda this is a compelling exposé of the nuclear industry propaganda.

Other Nuke News

Get the latest news on the Nuclear push at the Spinwatch site