Lee Bonser (alias)

From Powerbase
Revision as of 15:13, 3 August 2018 by Peter Salmon (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


URG logo 1.png

This article is part of the Undercover Research Portal at Powerbase - investigating corporate and police spying on activists



Part of a series on
undercover police officers
'HN33/98'
Male silhouette.png
Alias: Kathryn Lesley 'Lee' Bonser
Deployment: 1983-87
Unit:
Targets:
Greenham Common Women’s Peace Camp, Socialist Workers Party

Kathryn Lesley 'Lee' Bonser is a former undercover officer with the Special Demonstration Squad, who from 1983 to 1987 infiltrated both the Greenham Common Women’s Peace Camp and the Socialist Workers Party.[1]

She is also referred to by the ciphers HN33 & HN98 (for the HN cipher system, see the N officers page).

In the Undercover Policing Inquiry

  • 3 July 2018: cover name and groups targeted released by Inquiry.[1]
  • 22 March 2018: application over cover name refused; minded to restrict real name. Inquiry Chair, Sir John Mitting, wrote:[2]
HN33 is a sexagenarian who was principally deployed into one group in the mid-1980s. The deployment is of significant interest to the Inquiry, because the group was non-violent and posed no serious threat to public order. The reason for the deployment must be publicly investigated to permit the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. HN33 appears to have been the only undercover officer deployed into this group. The publication of the cover name of HN33 is necessary to permit former members of the group to provide information and/or give evidence about the deployment. They pose no threat to the safety of HN33. There is a small risk that publication of the cover name would lead to the identification of the real name of HN33, which may give rise to unwelcome media attention. It would not give rise to anything worse. It is the price which must be paid to permit the Inquiry to conduct a full investigation into the deployment.
Publication of the real name is not required to permit the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. It would interfere with the right to respect for private and family life of HN33 and would be neither proportionate nor justified under Article8(2) of the European Convention.
A closed note accompanies these reasons.
  • 20 Feb 2018: directions issued that applications for restriction orders to be submitted by end of month.[3]
  • Nov 2017: extent of restriction sought unclear and MPS asked to clarify this.[4]

Notes