Difference between revisions of "James Lovelock"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
NEEDS REFS
+
==History== 
  
James Lovelock is seen as one of the "gurus" of the environmental movement. However the myth that the media has built up around him as some green father figure is built on misconceptions. He has always been at odds with the green movement over nuclear power, as well as his suport for [[Shell]], and more recently his support for GM and high pesticide-use farming.  
+
James Ephraim Lovelock was born in Letchworth on July 26, 1919. He graduated as a chemist from Manchester University in 1941 and worked first for the Medical Research Council at the National Institute for Medical Research in London and then spent five years (1946 to 1951) at the Common CoId Research Unit at Harvard Hospital in Salisbury, Wiltshire.
 +
 
 +
In 1948 received a Ph.D. in medicine from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. He received the D.Sc. degree in biophysics from London University in 1959.
 +
 
 +
After working in the US, he established himself as an 'independent' scientist in 1964. He is most famous for his 'Gaia hypothesis'. The winner of numerous scientific prizes, he was made a fellow of the Royal Society in 1974. Since 1982 he has been associated with the Marine Biological Association at Plymouth, first as a council member, and from 1986 to 1990 as its president. He received the CBE in 1990. He is now an Honorary Visiting Fellow of Green College, Oxford University.
 +
 
 +
Lovelock is often described as a 'green' and 'independent’ scientist. He is said to be ‘green’ because of his ‘Gaia hypothesis’ – even though he is a long-standing supporter of nuclear power. He is described as ‘independent’ because he is not formally employed by any government, company or organisation. However, ‘freelance’ would be a more accurate description, as he has worked for big business and the security services since he went ‘independent’.
 +
 
 +
==Support for nuclear power==
 +
 
 +
Lovelock hit the headlines on 24 May 2004 when he declared in ''The Independent'': “I am a Green and I entreat my friends in the movement to drop their wrongheaded objection to nuclear energy.� Lovelock’s comments were widely reported in other media and consequently used by the pro-nuclear lobby to support their push for new nuclear power stations in the UK.
 +
 
 +
Lovelock originally offered a draft of this article to ''Resurgence'' Magazine which said it would only run it if an anti-nuclear article could be run alongside. Lovelock refused so he was told to take it elsewhere.
 +
 
 +
Contrary to the 2004 media coverage, Lovelock has long been a supporter of nuclear power – he has been on record as a supporter of nuclear power for more than 17 years.
 +
 
 +
In his 1988 book ''The Ages of Gaia'', Lovelock states: “I have never regarded nuclear radiation or nuclear power as anything other than a normal and inevitable part of the environment.�
 +
 
 +
In his autobiography ''Homage to Gaia'' (2000), he states that in 1993 “the Japanese Atomic Industrial Forum invited me to present a paper at their meeting in Yokahoma. I was glad to have a chance to express in public my strong support for nuclear energy� (p 396-7).
 +
 
 +
He also writes of the “beneficence of nuclear power� (p397) and attacks the Green movement as a “global over-anxious mother figure who is so concerned about small risks that she ignores the real dangers that loom. As in the biblical fable, we strain at the gnats of Chenobyl, and swallow the camel of massive pollution by our carbon-burning civilisation� (p397).
 +
 
 +
Of the October 1957 reactor fire at Windscale – the world’s first serious reactor incident – he says: “This incident exposed the people of England to what some would now consider a dangerous level of radioactive contamination. I wonder why we have heard nothing of an epidemic of thyroid and other cancers over the years that followed?� (p 143).
 +
 
 +
In an article for ''Readers Digest'' in March 2005, he writes: “Nuclear energy is safe, clean and effective… The Green idea that renewable energy can fill the gap left by retired nuclear power stations – and also meet the constantly rising demand for power – is romantic nonsense. Wind farms are monstrously inefficient and still need fossil-fuel back-up for the three days in four when the wind doesn’t blow. Solar energy is a ridiculous dream for northern Europe. Energy on a large scale from waves and tidal currents is far off�. [‘Our Nuclear Lifeline’, Readers Digest, March 2005].
 +
 
 +
He has also written: “If permitted, I would happily store high-level waste on my own land and use the heat from it to warm my home� [Daily Telegraph, August 15, 2001]. In the same article he added, bizarrely: “I have wondered if the small volumes of nuclear waste from power production should be stored in tropical forests and other habitats in need of a reliable guardian against their destruction by greedy developers.�
 +
 
 +
==Links to the nuclear industry==
 +
 
 +
Contrary to public percetion Lovelock has long-standing ties to the nuclear industry and its supporters. Lovelock’s website (www.ecolo.org/lovelock) is maintained by [[Bruno Comby]] and hosted by the [[Association of Environmentalists For Nuclear Energy]]. It states: “James Lovelock is in favor of the use of clean nuclear energy� and “he supports the Association of Environmentalists For Nuclear Energy (EFN).� It describes the pair as “friends�.
 +
 
 +
Lovelock wrote the foreword for Comby’s book Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy (which was reproduced in The Independent, on May 27, 2004).
 
   
 
   
Lovelock has long been a supporter of nuclear power and worked for the old CEGB and worked with the US nuclear industry. He has long been skeptical about the risks posed by nuclear power. AND SAID HE IS HAPPY TO HAVE NUCLEAR WASTE IN HIS GARDEN SHED - NEED REFS
+
He is a Patron of [[SONE]] [http://www.sone.org.uk/content/view/42/31/], whose Secretary is [[Sir Bernard Ingham]].
 +
 
 +
==Links to big business==
  
In his autobiography Homage To Gaia, he writes about the October 1957 reactor fire at Windscale – the world’s first serious reactor incident. “This incident exposed the people of England to what some would now consider a dangerous level of radioactive contamination. I wonder why we have heard nothing of an epidemic of thyroid and other cancers over the years that followed?â€? He also writes of his “strong support for nuclear energyâ€? and the “beneficence of nuclear powerâ€?.  
+
Lovelock started working for Shell in 1963, having regular monthly meetings with the Shell boss Lord Rothschild. He states in his book ''Homage to Gaia'': “My experiences with Shell left me firmly with the impression that they are neither stupid nor villains. On the contrary I know of no other human agency that plans as far ahead or considers the environment more closelyâ€? (p162-3). He has also worked with the Dupont Corporation and Hewlett Packard.  
  
He also worked with [[Shell]] for some 30 years, a company that has been complicit in human rights abuses in Nigeria, and whose operations are a major contributor to global warming. He argues that “I know of no other human agency that plans as far ahead or considers the environment more closely,â€? than Shell and dismisses environmentalists’ criticisms about the company. He also worked for the security services in both the UK and USA. 
+
==Links to security services==
  
He is a patron of [[SONE]] and an honorary member of [[Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy]] and a personal friend of its founder [[Bruno Comby]]. Lovelock wrote the introduction to Comby’s book “Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy� and his website feeds off Comby’s site and is designed by Comby. (REf?)
+
''Homage to Gaia'' describes how, in 1961, Lovelock went to work at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratories in Houston, as part of a team working on the first lunar mission.
  
However his article in May 2004 where he argued that “Nuclear power is the only green solutionâ€? to climate change certainly caused eruptions within the green movement, as it was portrayed as something new. In fact it was not. Lovelock originally offered a draft of this article to Resurgence Magazine who said they would only run it if an anti-nuclear article could be run alongside. Lovelock refused so he was told to take it elsewhere.  
+
It also reveals that in 1965 he met with CIA officers in Washington to discuss new ways of detecting people hiding in dense tropical forests, using electron capture technology. Lovelock describes how he also met with an unnamed General at the Pentagon and scientists at the Advanced Research Projects Agency (now known as DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, this is a US Department for Defence research organisation). All three agencies appeared disinterested in his proposals, but “I now know that the CIA and other American agencies did not make use of my idea until years later,� he writes (p170).
  
Lovelock has also been ostracised by certain former green colleagues.
+
One his return to London he discussed his experiences of the US security services with Lord Rothschild, at one of their monthly meetings. Rothschild – “it was rumoured that he had worked with the security services during the Second World War� – gave him a phone number and consequently two scientists from the UK’s Atomic Weapons Research Establishment came to see Lovelock (p172).
+
 
== Lovelock’s Links to other anti-Greens / right-wing think tanks ==
+
Subsequently, he was invited to go present his ideas at a meeting in Century House – then home to MI6 [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/936043.stm] – though Lovelock does not make this clear. The spooks’ “real interest was in the KGB and its agents in London and other cities�, he states (p173). A week later, Loverlock demonstrated his invention in the New Forest to a man called ‘Colin Place’ (p. 173).
 +
 
 +
Later, he was invited to Leconsfield House in Curzon Street, which then housed MI5 (again, Lovelock glosses over this) and was offered a lab at Holton Heath, a defence research establishment in Dorset. He writes that his work had a ‘high classificationâ€? (p175). He also notes: “The potential for chemical tracing was considerable and soon the security services decided to build a proper new laboratory at Holton Heath specifically for this needâ€? (p176). He concludes: “During my years with the Security Services I developed an instinct for discretion. This was invaluable in my work with multinational companies and other government agencies, where I discovered much more about their workings than I needed to knowâ€? (p179).  
 +
 
 +
==Links to anti-Greens==
  
Lovelock is also one of the original signatories of the “Declaration in Support of Protecting Nature With High-yield Farming and Forestry.â€? Other signatories are [[Patrick Moore]], ex-Greenpeace founder and now Greenpeace’s bete noir, [[Dennis Avery]] of the [[Centre for Global Food Issues]] which is affiliated to the right-wing [[Hudson Institute]] and [[Eugene Lapointe]] one of the leaders of the international “[[Wise Use Movement]]â€? and [[World Conservation Trust]] /IWMC and [[Norman Boulag]], a rabidly pro-GM scientist.  
+
Lovelock was also one of the original signatories of the “Declaration in Support of Protecting Nature With High-yield Farming and Forestry.â€? Other signatories are Patrick Moore, the ex-Greenpeace founder and now Greenpeace’s bette noir, Dennis Avery of the Centre for Global Food Issues which is affiliated to the right-wing Hudson Institute and Eugene Lapointe one of the leaders of the international “Wise Use Movementâ€? and World Conservation Trust /IWMC and Norman Boulag, a rabidly pro-GM scientist.  
  
[[Dennis Avery]] is one of the main people behind many of the attacks on organic food and author of the inspirationally-titled Saving the Planet with Pesticides and Plastic: The Environmental Triumph of High-Yield Farming, Avery sees himself as a missionary, promoting the high-tech farming industries: pesticides, irradiation, factory farming, and the newcomer: biotechnology.
+
Dennis Avery is one of the main people behind many of the attacks on organic food and author of the inspirationally-titled ''Saving the Planet with Pesticides and Plastic: The Environmental Triumph of High-Yield Farming''. Avery sees himself as a missionary, promoting the high-tech farming industries: pesticides, irradiation, factory farming, and the newcomer: biotechnology.
  
Avery is behind misleading claims that organic food is dangerous and is the originator of the 'E. Coli myth' – that people eating organic foods are at a significantly higher risk of food poisoning. He calls organic food a “gigantic marketing lie�. Avery believes that ‘Genetically modified foods are significantly safer than organic and natural foods. Over the last decade, consumers have eaten millions of pounds of genetically altered foods, and millions of tons of feed corn and soybean meal have been used to produce our meat and milk. So far, not even a skin rash has been linked to these new-tech foods’.
+
He is behind misleading claims that organic food is dangerous and is the originator of the 'E. Coli myth' – that people eating organic foods are at a significantly higher risk of food poisoning. He calls organic food a “gigantic marketing lieâ€?. Avery believes that ‘Genetically modified foods are significantly safer than organic and natural foods. Over the last decade, consumers have eaten millions of pounds of genetically altered foods, and millions of tons of feed corn and soybean meal have been used to produce our meat and milk. So far, not even a skin rash has been linked to these new-tech foods’.  
  
Avery was also a contributor to the book called “Fearing Food  - Risk, Health and Environmentâ€?, edited by [[Julian Morris]] and [[Roger Bate]], at the time from the right-wing think tank the [[Institute of Economic Affairs]] in London. Other contributors included [[Lynn Scarlett]] then from the [[Reason Foundation]] and [[Bruce Ames]], the controversial cancer scientist on the board of SEPP and a Director of the [[George C Marshall Institute]] and academic advisor to the Reason Foundation . Although Avery’s focus is meant to be agriculture, he is also a signatory to many of the [[Competitive Enterprise Institute]] letters on climate  
+
Avery was also a contributor to the book called “Fearing Food  - Risk, Health and Environmentâ€?, edited by Julian Morris and Roger Bate, at the time from the right-wing think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs in London (see also ESEF). Other contributors included Lynn Scarlett then from the Reason Foundation and Bruce Ames, the controversial cancer scientist on the board of SEPP and a Director of the George C Marshall Institute and academic advisor to the Reason Foundation . Although Avery’s focus is meant to be agriculture, he is also a signatory to many of the Competitive Enterprise Institute letters on climate.
  
Lapointe has a history of working with [[Magnus Gudmundsson]], and Norwegian whaler [[Georg Blichfeldt]] – both bete noirs of Greenpeace. Lapointe runs the organisation the [[International Wildlife Management Consortium]], a coalition of international hunting, shooting, whaling, right-wing and wise use organisations.
+
Lapointe has a history of working with Magnus Gudmundsson, and Norwegian whaler Georg Blichfeldt – both bette noirs of Greenpeace. Lapointe runs the organisation the International Wildlife Management Consortium, a coalition of international hunting, shooting, whaling, right-wing and wise use organisations.
  
Other signatories include Bruce Ames, the controversial cancer scientist on the board of [[Fred Singer]]’s SEPP and a Director of the [[George C Marshall Institute]] and academic advisor to the Reason Foundation, and [[Klauss Ammann]], a vehemently pro-GM scientist.
+
Other signatories include Bruce Ames, the controversial cancer scientist on the board of Fred Singer’s SEPP and a Director of the George C Marshall Institute and academic advisor to the Reason Foundation, and Klauss Ammann, a vehemently pro-GM scientist.

Revision as of 15:17, 5 January 2006

History

James Ephraim Lovelock was born in Letchworth on July 26, 1919. He graduated as a chemist from Manchester University in 1941 and worked first for the Medical Research Council at the National Institute for Medical Research in London and then spent five years (1946 to 1951) at the Common CoId Research Unit at Harvard Hospital in Salisbury, Wiltshire.

In 1948 received a Ph.D. in medicine from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. He received the D.Sc. degree in biophysics from London University in 1959.

After working in the US, he established himself as an 'independent' scientist in 1964. He is most famous for his 'Gaia hypothesis'. The winner of numerous scientific prizes, he was made a fellow of the Royal Society in 1974. Since 1982 he has been associated with the Marine Biological Association at Plymouth, first as a council member, and from 1986 to 1990 as its president. He received the CBE in 1990. He is now an Honorary Visiting Fellow of Green College, Oxford University.

Lovelock is often described as a 'green' and 'independent’ scientist. He is said to be ‘green’ because of his ‘Gaia hypothesis’ – even though he is a long-standing supporter of nuclear power. He is described as ‘independent’ because he is not formally employed by any government, company or organisation. However, ‘freelance’ would be a more accurate description, as he has worked for big business and the security services since he went ‘independent’.

Support for nuclear power

Lovelock hit the headlines on 24 May 2004 when he declared in The Independent: “I am a Green and I entreat my friends in the movement to drop their wrongheaded objection to nuclear energy.� Lovelock’s comments were widely reported in other media and consequently used by the pro-nuclear lobby to support their push for new nuclear power stations in the UK.

Lovelock originally offered a draft of this article to Resurgence Magazine which said it would only run it if an anti-nuclear article could be run alongside. Lovelock refused so he was told to take it elsewhere.

Contrary to the 2004 media coverage, Lovelock has long been a supporter of nuclear power – he has been on record as a supporter of nuclear power for more than 17 years.

In his 1988 book The Ages of Gaia, Lovelock states: “I have never regarded nuclear radiation or nuclear power as anything other than a normal and inevitable part of the environment.�

In his autobiography Homage to Gaia (2000), he states that in 1993 “the Japanese Atomic Industrial Forum invited me to present a paper at their meeting in Yokahoma. I was glad to have a chance to express in public my strong support for nuclear energy� (p 396-7).

He also writes of the “beneficence of nuclear power� (p397) and attacks the Green movement as a “global over-anxious mother figure who is so concerned about small risks that she ignores the real dangers that loom. As in the biblical fable, we strain at the gnats of Chenobyl, and swallow the camel of massive pollution by our carbon-burning civilisation� (p397).

Of the October 1957 reactor fire at Windscale – the world’s first serious reactor incident – he says: “This incident exposed the people of England to what some would now consider a dangerous level of radioactive contamination. I wonder why we have heard nothing of an epidemic of thyroid and other cancers over the years that followed?� (p 143).

In an article for Readers Digest in March 2005, he writes: “Nuclear energy is safe, clean and effective… The Green idea that renewable energy can fill the gap left by retired nuclear power stations – and also meet the constantly rising demand for power – is romantic nonsense. Wind farms are monstrously inefficient and still need fossil-fuel back-up for the three days in four when the wind doesn’t blow. Solar energy is a ridiculous dream for northern Europe. Energy on a large scale from waves and tidal currents is far off�. [‘Our Nuclear Lifeline’, Readers Digest, March 2005].

He has also written: “If permitted, I would happily store high-level waste on my own land and use the heat from it to warm my home� [Daily Telegraph, August 15, 2001]. In the same article he added, bizarrely: “I have wondered if the small volumes of nuclear waste from power production should be stored in tropical forests and other habitats in need of a reliable guardian against their destruction by greedy developers.�

Links to the nuclear industry

Contrary to public percetion Lovelock has long-standing ties to the nuclear industry and its supporters. Lovelock’s website (www.ecolo.org/lovelock) is maintained by Bruno Comby and hosted by the Association of Environmentalists For Nuclear Energy. It states: “James Lovelock is in favor of the use of clean nuclear energy� and “he supports the Association of Environmentalists For Nuclear Energy (EFN).� It describes the pair as “friends�.

Lovelock wrote the foreword for Comby’s book Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy (which was reproduced in The Independent, on May 27, 2004).

He is a Patron of SONE [1], whose Secretary is Sir Bernard Ingham.

Links to big business

Lovelock started working for Shell in 1963, having regular monthly meetings with the Shell boss Lord Rothschild. He states in his book Homage to Gaia: “My experiences with Shell left me firmly with the impression that they are neither stupid nor villains. On the contrary I know of no other human agency that plans as far ahead or considers the environment more closely� (p162-3). He has also worked with the Dupont Corporation and Hewlett Packard.

Links to security services

Homage to Gaia describes how, in 1961, Lovelock went to work at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratories in Houston, as part of a team working on the first lunar mission.

It also reveals that in 1965 he met with CIA officers in Washington to discuss new ways of detecting people hiding in dense tropical forests, using electron capture technology. Lovelock describes how he also met with an unnamed General at the Pentagon and scientists at the Advanced Research Projects Agency (now known as DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, this is a US Department for Defence research organisation). All three agencies appeared disinterested in his proposals, but “I now know that the CIA and other American agencies did not make use of my idea until years later,� he writes (p170).

One his return to London he discussed his experiences of the US security services with Lord Rothschild, at one of their monthly meetings. Rothschild – “it was rumoured that he had worked with the security services during the Second World War� – gave him a phone number and consequently two scientists from the UK’s Atomic Weapons Research Establishment came to see Lovelock (p172).

Subsequently, he was invited to go present his ideas at a meeting in Century House – then home to MI6 [2] – though Lovelock does not make this clear. The spooks’ “real interest was in the KGB and its agents in London and other cities�, he states (p173). A week later, Loverlock demonstrated his invention in the New Forest to a man called ‘Colin Place’ (p. 173).

Later, he was invited to Leconsfield House in Curzon Street, which then housed MI5 (again, Lovelock glosses over this) and was offered a lab at Holton Heath, a defence research establishment in Dorset. He writes that his work had a ‘high classification� (p175). He also notes: “The potential for chemical tracing was considerable and soon the security services decided to build a proper new laboratory at Holton Heath specifically for this need� (p176). He concludes: “During my years with the Security Services I developed an instinct for discretion. This was invaluable in my work with multinational companies and other government agencies, where I discovered much more about their workings than I needed to know� (p179).

Links to anti-Greens

Lovelock was also one of the original signatories of the “Declaration in Support of Protecting Nature With High-yield Farming and Forestry.� Other signatories are Patrick Moore, the ex-Greenpeace founder and now Greenpeace’s bette noir, Dennis Avery of the Centre for Global Food Issues which is affiliated to the right-wing Hudson Institute and Eugene Lapointe one of the leaders of the international “Wise Use Movement� and World Conservation Trust /IWMC and Norman Boulag, a rabidly pro-GM scientist.

Dennis Avery is one of the main people behind many of the attacks on organic food and author of the inspirationally-titled Saving the Planet with Pesticides and Plastic: The Environmental Triumph of High-Yield Farming. Avery sees himself as a missionary, promoting the high-tech farming industries: pesticides, irradiation, factory farming, and the newcomer: biotechnology.

He is behind misleading claims that organic food is dangerous and is the originator of the 'E. Coli myth' – that people eating organic foods are at a significantly higher risk of food poisoning. He calls organic food a “gigantic marketing lie�. Avery believes that ‘Genetically modified foods are significantly safer than organic and natural foods. Over the last decade, consumers have eaten millions of pounds of genetically altered foods, and millions of tons of feed corn and soybean meal have been used to produce our meat and milk. So far, not even a skin rash has been linked to these new-tech foods’.

Avery was also a contributor to the book called “Fearing Food - Risk, Health and Environment�, edited by Julian Morris and Roger Bate, at the time from the right-wing think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs in London (see also ESEF). Other contributors included Lynn Scarlett then from the Reason Foundation and Bruce Ames, the controversial cancer scientist on the board of SEPP and a Director of the George C Marshall Institute and academic advisor to the Reason Foundation . Although Avery’s focus is meant to be agriculture, he is also a signatory to many of the Competitive Enterprise Institute letters on climate.

Lapointe has a history of working with Magnus Gudmundsson, and Norwegian whaler Georg Blichfeldt – both bette noirs of Greenpeace. Lapointe runs the organisation the International Wildlife Management Consortium, a coalition of international hunting, shooting, whaling, right-wing and wise use organisations.

Other signatories include Bruce Ames, the controversial cancer scientist on the board of Fred Singer’s SEPP and a Director of the George C Marshall Institute and academic advisor to the Reason Foundation, and Klauss Ammann, a vehemently pro-GM scientist.