Difference between revisions of "Intelligence Research Unit"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Based at the headquarters of the [[Intelligence Corps]] at [[Maresfield]].
+
The [[Intelligence Research Unit]] was set up in 1957 and was based at the headquarters of the [[Intelligence Corps]] at [[Maresfield]].
  
:By 1957 Britain had set up an "intelligence research unit" at [[Maresfield]] in Sussex, and by 1962, SAS and paratroop units were being given training there to cope with capture. In April 1971, in conditions of great secrecy, a course in sensory deprivation was held at Maresfield for members of the [[Royal Ulster Constabulary]]. In the early morning of August 9 that year, the British army began its mass internment programme, arresting and imprisoning, without charges or courts, hundreds of suspected members of the IRA. Hidden within the mass internments was another programme, involving 14 prisoners, to test the new interrogation techniques.<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/feb/18/usa.afghanistan 'Nobody is talking'] The evidence of two new books demonstrates that 9/11 created the will for new, harsher interrogation techniques of foreign suspects by the US and led to the abuses in Guantánamo, Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond. In a special report, James Meek reveals that it is the British who refined these methods, and who have provided the precedent for legalised torture
+
:By 1957 Britain had set up an "intelligence research unit" at [[Maresfield]] in Sussex, and by 1962, [[SAS]] and paratroop units were being given training there to cope with capture. In April 1971, in conditions of great secrecy, a course in sensory deprivation was held at Maresfield for members of the [[Royal Ulster Constabulary]]. In the early morning of August 9 that year, the British army began its mass internment programme, arresting and imprisoning, without charges or courts, hundreds of suspected members of the IRA. Hidden within the mass internments was another programme, involving 14 prisoners, to test the new interrogation techniques.<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/feb/18/usa.afghanistan 'Nobody is talking'] The evidence of two new books demonstrates that 9/11 created the will for new, harsher interrogation techniques of foreign suspects by the US and led to the abuses in Guantánamo, Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond. In a special report, James Meek reveals that it is the British who refined these methods, and who have provided the precedent for legalised torture
 
The Guardian, Friday February 18 2005</ref>
 
The Guardian, Friday February 18 2005</ref>
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
[[Category:Psychological Warfare]][[Category:Counterinsurgency]][[Category:Spooks]]
+
[[Category:Psychological Warfare]][[Category:Counterinsurgency]][[Category:Spooks]][[Category:British Military Intelligence]]

Latest revision as of 19:23, 12 June 2010

The Intelligence Research Unit was set up in 1957 and was based at the headquarters of the Intelligence Corps at Maresfield.

By 1957 Britain had set up an "intelligence research unit" at Maresfield in Sussex, and by 1962, SAS and paratroop units were being given training there to cope with capture. In April 1971, in conditions of great secrecy, a course in sensory deprivation was held at Maresfield for members of the Royal Ulster Constabulary. In the early morning of August 9 that year, the British army began its mass internment programme, arresting and imprisoning, without charges or courts, hundreds of suspected members of the IRA. Hidden within the mass internments was another programme, involving 14 prisoners, to test the new interrogation techniques.[1]

Notes

  1. 'Nobody is talking' The evidence of two new books demonstrates that 9/11 created the will for new, harsher interrogation techniques of foreign suspects by the US and led to the abuses in Guantánamo, Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond. In a special report, James Meek reveals that it is the British who refined these methods, and who have provided the precedent for legalised torture The Guardian, Friday February 18 2005