HN298

From Powerbase
Revision as of 09:55, 10 March 2018 by Peter Salmon (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Undercover_Police_Officer_sidebar|Name='HN298'|Alias=unknown|Series=undercover police officers|Image=Male_silhouette.png |Unit=Special Demonstration Squad|DatesDeployed=unkn...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


URG logo 1.png

This article is part of the Undercover Research Portal at Powerbase - investigating corporate and police spying on activists



Part of a series on
undercover police officers
'HN298'
Male silhouette.png
Alias: unknown
Deployment: unknown
Unit:
Targets:
unknown

HN298 is the cipher given to a former Special Demonstration Squad] undercover officer. They were deployed in the 1970s against two groups, one of which was ivnolved in anti-apartheid campaigning.

For the N cipher system see N officers page.

As an SDS officer

Deployed against two groups in the 1970s, one of which was involved in anti-apartheid campaigning:[1]

In the course of his deployment, he was arrested at a demonstration against the British Lions rugby tour to South Africa on 12 May 1972 for obstruction of the highway and assault of a police officer. He was prosecuted in summary proceedings in his cover name. He was convicted of both offenses and fined and made the subject of a conditional discharge. His actions were approved by his line management. Not long after his deployment, he left the police service, since when he has had nothing to do with the police.

In the Undercover Policing Inquiry

An application was made to restrict HN298's real name, but none was made in relation to cover name. Regarding thereal name application, the Inquiry Chair, John Mitting, noted:[1]

It is possible that, if his cover name is published, members of the groups against whom he was deployed will remember him and be able to give evidence about him. For that to happen, it is not necessary that his real name should be published. He has politely declined to cooperate with the Metropolitan Police risk assessor. In consequence, the Inquiry does not know whether he wishes to protect his real name. If he were to do so, and no new information adverse to him were to emerge, the interference with right to respect for his private life under Article 8(2) of the European Convention which would be occasioned by publication of his real name would not be justified. For the time being, on the application of the Metropolitan Police Service, his real name should not be published. This decision will be reviewed when he has made his own position clear.

Mitting also stated:[1]

Between 1997 and 2001 HN127 was a cover officer for deployed undercover officers, some of whose activities are likely to be the subject of detailed investigation by the Inquiry. With one significant proviso, addressed below, public investigation of HN127’s performance of his duties in his real name can be undertaken without posing a risk to HN127’s safety or interfering with the right to respect for private and family life of HN127. It is unavoidable, for reasons explained in the closed note which accompanies these reasons, that part of HN127’s evidence will be given in closed session.

Notes