HN17

From Powerbase
Revision as of 12:54, 10 March 2018 by Peter Salmon (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


URG logo 1.png

This article is part of the Undercover Research Portal at Powerbase - investigating corporate and police spying on activists



Part of a series on
undercover police officers
'HN17'
Male silhouette.png
Alias: unknown
Deployment: sometime between 1993 and 2008
Unit:
Targets:
Right wing groups

HN17 is the cipher given to a former Special Demonstration Squad] undercover officer who was deployed into right wing groups in some period during the last 15 years of the SDS's existance, probably mid/early 1990s.

For the N cipher system see N officers page.

As an SDS officer

Mark Ellison's Independent Stephen Lawrence Review references HN17 as someone mentioned by Bob Lambert as a contemporary of Peter Francis (early/mid 1990s) and as having infiltrated far right groups (Ellison, p. 214).[1]

In the Undercover Policing Inquiry

An application for restriction order over real and cover names made in October 2017, with open material being ubsequently published.[2]

Restriction order material: Open application (24 Oct 2017), Medical report (19 April 2017), Personal statement (22 Sept 2017) and Risk Assessment (8 Nov 2017), Medical report (gisted)

On 17 November 2017, the Inquiry Chair, John Mitting, indicated he was minded to restrict both the real and cover name of HN17, stating:[3]

HN17 is no longer a serving police officer. HN17 was deployed against a number of groups in the last 15 years of the existence of the SDS. If the true identity were to be discovered by members of them HN17 would be at real risk of serious violence by them or their associates. Nothing in the nature of the deployment or of what is known of HN17’s conduct of it could justify running that risk.
For reasons which can only be, and are, explained in the closed note accompanying these reasons, publication of the cover name would be likely eventually to lead to the discovery of the real name [emphasis added]. That is not a risk which I am prepared to run. Even if Article 3 of the European Convention is not, on the facts, engaged, Article 8 is; and the interference with HN17’s right to respect for private and family life which would be occasioned by both the risk and occurrence of violence would not be justified under Article 8(2).
Careful thought will, in the future, need to be given to the manner in which the evidence of HN17 will be received by the Inquiry.

This provisional ruling is repeated in a press release of 21 March 2018.[4] The application is schedule to be heard on 21 March 2018.[5]

Notes