HN102

This article is part of the Undercover Research Portal at Powerbase - investigating corporate and police spying on activists

---

Part of a series on undercover police officers
'HN102'
Alias:	unknown
Deployment:	1980s
Unit:	Special Demonstration Squad
Targets:	anarchist

HN102 is the cipher given to a former undercover officer with the Special Demonstration Squad. They were deployed into anarchist groups in the 1980s.

Sir John Mitting, Chair of the Undercover Policing Inquiry, has indicated he is minded to restrict the real and cover names in the Inquiry on heath grounds.

• For the N cipher system see N officers page.

In the Undercover Public Inquiry

• 19 April 2018: directed that any application to be filed by 24 April 2018 by MPS legal team, or 27 April for the Designated Lawyers team.

• 23 May 2018: minded to restrict real and cover name,, with Mitting stating:

HN102 is in his 50s. He was deployed against anarchist groups in the 1980s. The risk, if any, which they might pose to his safety cannot be assessed, because no risk assessment has been undertaken. After his retirement from the police, on health grounds (unrelated to his deployment), two craniotomies were performed in the late 1990s. The second led to a stroke which has caused permanent right-sided physical disabilities and some mental impairment, including difficulties of recall and concentration. He also suffers from moderate depression. In the opinion of Professor Fox, a consultant psychiatrist, the stress of being required to provide or give evidence would cause his anxiety to increase which would cause a deterioration in his cognition. He questions his reliability as a witness.

Participation in the Inquiry, in any form, would interfere with the right of HN102 to respect for his private life. I have considered whether publication of his cover name might prompt others who knew him during his deployment to provide or give evidence about it. In the opinion of Prof Fox, disclosure of his cover identity would cause a deterioration in his cognition and potentially his depression. In ProfessorFox's non-expert opinion on this issue, the stress which would result might put him at risk of future strokes. It is not necessary to obtain the opinion of a physician on this issue. It is clear that publication of his cover name would also interfere with the right of HN102 o respect or his private life. It is likely, although not yet certain, that contemporaneous reporting of intelligence on the groups against which he was deployed exists which might prompt members of them to give evidence about their activities, as reported. The outcome is likely to be imperfect, but that likelihood does not justify the interference in HN 102 is right to respect for his private life which would be occasioned by publication of his real or cover name, under Article 8(2) ECHR.

• 9 July 2018: provisional decision to restrict real and cover names. and gist of application and medical evidence published.