Difference between revisions of "Globalisation:Citigroup"
Jamie Scott (talk | contribs) (→WorldCom Scandal) |
Jamie Scott (talk | contribs) (→Global Crossing) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
=== Global Crossing === | === Global Crossing === | ||
| − | + | Similarly, in 2005 Citigroup paid $75m (£39.2m) to settle a class-action suit brought over its role in the collapse of telecom network Global Crossing. | |
| − | + | Citigroup was accused of issuing exaggerated research reports and failing to highlight conflicts of interest in the three-year-old case. | |
=== European Bonds === | === European Bonds === | ||
Revision as of 12:12, 25 March 2008
Contents
Profile
Citibank was founded in 1812, and is now one of the world's leading financial services companies. The Citi Group has over 200 million customer accounts in more than 100 countries.
Other major brand names in Citi's diverse portfolio include Citi Cards, CitiFinancial, CitiMortgage, CitiInsurance, Primerica, Diners Club, Citi Private Bank, and CitiCapital. [1]
Controversies
WorldCom Scandal
In 2004, Citigroup agreed to pay $2.6bn (£1.4bn) to settle a class action suits accusing the financial institution of participating in fraud with WorldCom, the phone company now known as MCI.
Shareholders have sued Citigroup after the collapse of WorldCom amid allegations surrounding a former telecom analyst Jack Grubman, who was found to be hyping WorldCom and other hi-tech stocks.
WorldCom filed for the biggest bankruptcy in history in July 2002 with allegations of accounting irregularities and Mr Grubman was consequently fined $15m and barred from the securities industry for issuing misleading research.
Citigroup explained that it had agreed to settle federal class action suits brought on behalf of those who had purchased WorldCom stock from April 29, 1999, to June 25, 2002.
In response, Charles Prince, Citigroup's Chief Executive, claimed the settlement was part of an ongoing effort "to put an unfortunate chapter behind us". [2]
Global Crossing
Similarly, in 2005 Citigroup paid $75m (£39.2m) to settle a class-action suit brought over its role in the collapse of telecom network Global Crossing.
Citigroup was accused of issuing exaggerated research reports and failing to highlight conflicts of interest in the three-year-old case.
European Bonds
Citigroup has been ordered to pay almost £14m to the Financial Services Authority as the penalty for a controversial trade in the government bond markets last year.
The world's largest financial firm is being forced to hand over £9.9m of profits from the trade and pay a £4m fine because of failures to control its bond business. This is the second largest financial punishment handed out by the City regulator after oil company Shell was fined £17m last year.
The American banking group escaped more draconian regulatory action after the FSA concluded it had not deliberately tried to distort the bond market when the trades took place on August 2.
However, Citigroup's reputation has suffered and it has been left out in the cold when European governments have considered bond issues.
Citigroup acknowledged the trading strategy - nicknamed Dr Evil - had harmed the business and insisted it wished it had never taken place. It involved using the MTS electronic trading system to sell as many bonds in 18 seconds as would usually be traded in an entire day. A trading error then forced Citigroup to buy back some of the bonds it had sold.
Citigroup and Japan
Japan's market watchdog has ordered US banking giant Citigroup to shut down its private banking operations there. Regulators said they found a list of problems at Citigroup's private banking arm, from improper trading practices to lax anti-money laundering procedures.
Japan's Financial Services Agency ordered the US banking group to suspend new private banking business by the end of this month, and gave it one year's breathing space to close all accounts at the four branches. They will have their licences revoked on 30 September 2005.
Among its charges, the FSA said the bank had brokered deals on such items as artworks without properly informing customers of the risks.
It also allowed transactions which "could be suspected of being associated with money laundering".
"In a management environment in which profits are given undue importance by the bank's headquarters, a law-evading sales system that disregards the laws and regulations of Japan was constructed," the FSA said.
Bank staff and managers, it added, had "obstructed inspectors", while responses to official inquiries "differed from the truth".
Notes
- ↑ http://www.citigroup.com/citigroup/about/index.htm Citi Group], accessed 25 March 2008
- ↑ Guardian Online, accessed 4 March 2008
- ↑ Guardian Online, accessed 4 March 2008
- ↑ BBC News Online, accessed 4 March 2008
