Difference between revisions of "Charles Windsor"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(brief start)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Prince Charles, Prince of Wales,''' KG KT GCB OM AK QSO CD SOM GCL PC AdC(P) FRS (Charles Philip Arthur George; born 14 November 1948) is the heir apparent and eldest son of Queen Elizabeth II. In Scotland he is known as The Duke of Rothesay.
 
'''Prince Charles, Prince of Wales,''' KG KT GCB OM AK QSO CD SOM GCL PC AdC(P) FRS (Charles Philip Arthur George; born 14 November 1948) is the heir apparent and eldest son of Queen Elizabeth II. In Scotland he is known as The Duke of Rothesay.
 +
 +
 +
==Countryside Alliance==
  
 
*lent his house to the [[Countryside Alliance]] for a cocktail party <ref>http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=2619</ref>
 
*lent his house to the [[Countryside Alliance]] for a cocktail party <ref>http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=2619</ref>
 +
 +
==Support for alternative medicine==
 +
 +
The Prince personally wrote at least seven letters<ref name=DC>{{cite web|url=http://www.dcscience.net/?p=89|title=HRH “meddling in politics”|date=12 March 2007|publisher=DC's Improbable Science}}</ref> to the [[Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency]] (MHRA) shortly before they relaxed the rules governing labelling of herbal products, a decision that has been widely condemned by scientists.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article624874.ece |work=The Times |location=UK | date=1 September 2006 | title=Doctors attack natural remedy claims| author=Nigel Hawkes and Mark Henderson | location=London}}</ref>
 +
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 07:09, 8 March 2011

Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, KG KT GCB OM AK QSO CD SOM GCL PC AdC(P) FRS (Charles Philip Arthur George; born 14 November 1948) is the heir apparent and eldest son of Queen Elizabeth II. In Scotland he is known as The Duke of Rothesay.


Countryside Alliance

Support for alternative medicine

The Prince personally wrote at least seven letters[2] to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) shortly before they relaxed the rules governing labelling of herbal products, a decision that has been widely condemned by scientists.[3]


References

  1. http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=2619
  2. HRH “meddling in politics”.  DC's Improbable Science.
  3. Nigel Hawkes and Mark Henderson (1 September 2006) Doctors attack natural remedy claims.